UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrantþ
Filed by a Party other than the Registranto¨

Check the appropriate box:

o¨Preliminary Proxy Statement
o¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þDefinitive Proxy Statement
o¨Definitive Additional Materials
o¨Soliciting Material Pursuant toUnder §240.14a-12
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þNo fee required.
oFee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set(Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5) Total fee paid:
o
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
1) Amount Previously Paid:
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3) Filing Party:
4) Date Filed:








arholdings3colorfinala02.jpg
  
2001 Aerojet Road                  222 N. Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 500
Rancho Cordova,El Segundo, CA 95742 or mail to: P.O. Box 537012 Sacramento, CA 95853-701290245
March 18, 201626, 2019

Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., which will be held at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time, on April 27, 2016.May 9, 2019. Our 20162019 Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders, which will be conducted via a live webcast. You will be able to attend the meeting on the Internet and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com. Details regarding how to attend the meeting online and the business to be presented at the meeting can be found in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.
We have elected to take advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rule that allows us to furnish our proxy materials to our stockholders over the Internet. We believe electronic delivery will expedite the receipt of materials and, by printing and mailing a smaller volume, will reduce the environmental impact of our annual meeting materials and help lower our costs. On or about March 18, 2016,29, 2019 a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice of Internet Availability”) will be mailed to our stockholders. This Notice containsof Internet Availability will contain instructions on how to access the Notice of Annual Meeting, the Proxy Statement and the Company’s Annual Report for 2018 on Form 10-K (the “2018 Annual Report”) to Stockholdersstockholders online. You will not receive a printed copy of these materials unless you specifically request one. The Notice of Internet Availability contains instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials. For those participants who hold shares of the Company’s common stock in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan, you will receive a full set of annual meeting materials and a proxy card by mail.
On behalf of the Board of Directors and the management of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., I extend our appreciation for your continued support.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Warren G. Lichtenstein
WARREN G. LICHTENSTEIN
Executive Chairman of the Board






arholdings3colorfinala02.jpg
2001 Aerojet Road                  
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 or mail to: P.O. Box 537012 Sacramento, CA 95853-7012
AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS, INC. NOTICE OF 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TIME:                     9:00 a.m. Pacific Time on Wednesday, April 27, 2016
PLACE:    Online at ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com     
ITEMS OF BUSINESS:1.   To elect eight directors to our Board of Directors to serve until the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified;
2.   To consider and approve an advisory resolution to approve executive compensation;
3.  To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as independent auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016; and
4.   To consider and act on such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
RECORD DATE:You are entitled to vote at the 2016 Annual Meeting if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on March 1, 2016.
VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING ADMISSION:Stockholders of record on the record date will be able to participate in the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders via the Internet by visiting ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com. To participate in the meeting, you will need the control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability, on your proxy card, or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.
PROXY VOTING:It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. You may vote your shares by voting electronically at the meeting by visiting ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com and following the instructions, by Internet, by telephone or by completing, signing, dating and returning a proxy card which will be mailed to you if you request delivery of a full set of proxy materials. Participants in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan must follow the voting instructions provided by Fidelity Management Trust Company. See details under the heading “How do I vote?”
INSPECTION OF LIST OF
STOCKHOLDERS OF RECORD:
A list of the stockholders of record as of the record date will be available for inspection electronically during the virtual Annual Meeting.
DATE
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Kathleen E. Redd
KATHLEEN E. REDD
Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary

TIMERECORD DATE
Thursday, May 9, 20199:00 A.M. Pacific TimeWednesday, March 13, 2019

HOW TO CAST YOUR VOTE

It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. You may vote your shares by voting electronically at the meeting by visiting ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com and following the instructions, by Internet, by telephone or by completing, signing, dating and returning a proxy card which will be mailed to you if you request delivery of a full set of proxy materials. Participants in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan must follow the voting instructions provided by Fidelity Management Trust Company. See details under the heading “How do I vote?” on page 65.





TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
1
PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
6
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES
10
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
16
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
21
AUDIT AND ORGANIZATION & COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
23
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
24
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
26
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
48
PROPOSAL 2 - ADVISORY VOTE ON AEROJET ROCKETDYNE’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
50
PROPOSAL 3 - RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
51
OTHER BUSINESS
52





ONLINE 
BY PHONE 
2001 Aerojet Road                  
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 orBY MAIL
Vote online at www.proxyvote.com. You may also vote online during the meeting at ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.comVote by phone by calling 1-800-690-6903If you have received a printed version of these proxy materials you may vote by mail to: P.O. Box 537012 Sacramento, CA 95853-7012using the postage-paid envelope provided
PROXY STATEMENTHOW TO ATTEND THE MEETING
FOR THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held On April 27, 2016
GENERAL INFORMATION
The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Aerojet Rocketdyne” orAttend the “Company”) solicits the enclosed proxy for use at the Company’s 20162019 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on April 27, 2016online at ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com.
The Annual Meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time. Our 2016 Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders, which will be conducted via a live webcast. You can attend the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit questions during the meeting by visiting ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
WHY DID I RECEIVE THIS PROXY STATEMENT?
The Board is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Annual Meeting because you were a stockholder of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.10 per share (“Common Stock”), at the close of business (5:00 p.m. Eastern time)Time on March 1, 2016, (the “Record Date”) and therefore you are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement contains information about the matters to be voted on at the meeting and the voting process, as well as information about the Company’s directors (“Directors”) and executive officers.
We are providing you with a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice of Internet Availability”) and access to these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the Board of the Company to be used at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement. The Notice of Internet Availability will be sent to stockholders of record and beneficial stockholders starting on or around March 18, 2016. The Proxy materials, including the Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement, and 2015 Annual Report, will be made available to stockholders on the Internet on March 18, 2016. For those participants who hold shares of the Company’s Common Stock in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan, you will receive a full set of annual meeting materials and a proxy card for those shares.
WHY DID I RECEIVE A NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS THIS YEAR INSTEAD OF A FULL SET OF PROXY MATERIALS?
Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are providing access to the Company’s proxy materials over the Internet rather than printing and mailing them to all stockholders. We believe electronic delivery will expedite the receipt of these materials, reduce the environmental impact of our annual meeting materials and will help lower our costs. Therefore, the Notice of Internet Availability will be mailed to stockholders (or e-mailed, in the case of stockholders that have previously requested to receive proxy materials electronically) starting on or around March 18, 2016. The Notice of Internet Availability will provide instructions as to how stockholders may access and review the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice of Internet Availability or, alternatively, how to request that a copy of the proxy materials, including a proxy card, be sent to them by mail. The Notice of Internet Availability will also provide voting instructions. In addition, stockholders may request to receive the proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail on an ongoing basis for future stockholder meetings. Please note that, while our proxy materials are available at www.proxyvote.com referenced in the Notice of Internet Availability, no other information contained on the website is incorporated by reference in or considered to be a part of this Proxy Statement.

1


WHY DID I RECEIVE MORE THAN ONE NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY?
You may receive multiple Notices of Internet Availability if you hold your shares of Aerojet Rocketdyne’s Common Stock in multiple accounts (such as through a brokerage account). If you hold your shares of Aerojet Rocketdyne’s Common Stock in multiple accounts you should vote your shares as described in each separate Notice of Internet Availability you receive.
IF AEROJET ROCKETDYNE IS UTILIZING NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILILTY, WHY DID I RECEIVE A FULL SET OF ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS AND A PROXY CARD?
For those participants who hold shares of the Company’s Common Stock in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan, you will receive a full set of annual meeting materials and a proxy card for those shares. Fidelity Management Trust Company, (the “Trustee”), is not utilizing Notice of Internet Availability for the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan participants.
WHAT AM I VOTING ON?
You are voting on the following items of business at the Annual Meeting:
To elect eight directors to our Board (the Board’s nominees are: Thomas A. Corcoran; Eileen P. Drake; James R. Henderson; Warren G. Lichtenstein; Lance W. Lord; Merrill A. McPeak; James H. Perry; and Martin Turchin) to serve until the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified (“Proposal 1”);
To consider and approve an advisory resolution to approve executive compensation (“Proposal 2”);
To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), an independent registered public accounting firm, as independent auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 (“Proposal 3”); and
Any other matter that may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting.
WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTE?
Stockholders of record as of the Record Date are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote.
WHAT ARE THE VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD?
The Board recommends that you vote your shares “FOR” each of the Board’s eight nominees standing for election to the Board; “FOR” the advisory resolution to approve executive compensation; and “FOR” the ratification of PwC, an independent registered public accounting firm, as independent auditors of the Company.
HOW DO I VOTE?
This year’s Annual Meeting will be held entirely online to allow greater participation. Stockholders may participate in the Annual Meeting by visiting ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com on the Internet.Thursday, May 9, 2019.
To participate in the Annual Meetingmeeting, you will need the control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability, on your proxy card, or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. Even if you plan to participate in
The record date for the Annual Meeting online, we urgeis Wednesday, March 13, 2019. This means you are entitled to vote as soon as possible by onereceive notice of the following methods to make sure yourmeeting and vote shares are represented if you later decide not to participate in the virtual Annual Meeting online.
SHARES HELD IN THE AEROJET ROCKETDYNE RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
Please follow the voting instructions provided by Fidelity Management Trust Company, the Trustee. You may sign, date and return a voting instruction card to the Trustee or submit voting instructions by telephone or the Internet. If you provide voting instructions by mail, telephone, or the Internet, the Trustee will vote your shares as you have directed (or not vote your shares, if that is your direction). If you do not provide voting instructions, the Trustee will vote your

2


shares in the same proportion as shares for which the Trustee has received voting instructions. You must submit voting instructions to the Trustee by no later than April 22, 2016 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time in order for your shares to be voted as you have directed by the Trustee at the Annual Meeting. Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan participants may not vote their Plan shares in person at the Annual Meeting.
SHARES HELD BY YOU, YOUR BROKER, BANK OR OTHER HOLDER OF RECORD
You may vote in several different ways:
By Internet during the Annual Meeting:You may vote electronically during the Annual Meeting on Wednesday, April 27, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time via the Internet at ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com using the control number we have provided to you. You may also be represented by another person at the meeting by executing a proxy properly designating that person. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and wish to vote electronically during the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other holder of record.
By Telephone: You may vote by calling the toll-free telephone number indicated on your proxy card. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your voting instructions have been properly recorded.
By Internet before the meeting date:You may vote by going to the Internet website indicated on your proxy card. Confirmation that your voting instructions have been properly recorded will be provided.
By Mail:You may vote by completing, signing, dating and returning a proxy card which will be mailed to you if you request delivery of a full set of proxy materials. A postage-paid envelope will be provided along with the proxy card.
Telephone and Internet voting before the meeting date for stockholders of record will be available until 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on April 26, 2016. A mailed proxy card must be received by April 26, 2016 in order to be voted at the Annual Meeting. The availability of telephone and Internet voting for beneficial owners of other shares held in “street name” will depend on your broker, bank or other holder of record and we recommend that you follow the voting instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability that you receive from them.
If you are mailed a set of proxy materials and a proxy card or voting instruction card and you choose to vote by telephone or by Internet, you do not have to return your proxy card or voting instruction card. However, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you vote your shares in advance so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the meeting.
IS MY VOTE CONFIDENTIAL?
Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed, either within the Company or to third parties, except: (1) as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements; (2) to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote; and (3) to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation. Occasionally, stockholders provide on their proxy card written comments, which are then forwarded to management.
MAY I ATTEND THE MEETING?
All stockholders and properly appointed proxy holders may attend the Annual Meeting over the Internet at ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com. Stockholders who plan to attend must have the control number we have provided to you to join the virtual Annual Meeting. Instructions on how to attend and participate via the Internet, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, are posted at ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com. Stockholders of record will be verified against an official list available electronically at the Annual Meeting. The Company reserves the right to deny admittance to anyone who cannot adequately show proof of share ownership as of the Record Date.

3


WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HOLDING SHARES AS A STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD AND AS A BENEFICIAL OWNER?
If your shares are registered directly in your name with Aerojet Rocketdyne’s transfer agent, Computershare Shareowner Services, LLC, you are considered a “stockholder of record” or a “registered stockholder” of those shares. In this case, your Notice of Internet Availability has been sent to you directly by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trust or other nominee or custodian, including shares you may own as a participant in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares, which are held in “street name.” A Notice of Internet Availability has been forwarded to you by or on behalf of your broker, bank, trustee or other holder who is considered the stockholder of record of those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, trustee or other holder of record as to how to vote your shares by following their instructions for voting.
WHAT ARE BROKER NON-VOTES AND HOW ARE THEY COUNTED?
Broker non-votes occur when nominees, such as brokers and banks holding shares on behalf of the beneficial owners, are prohibited from exercising discretionary voting authority for beneficial owners who have not provided voting instructions at least ten days before the Annual Meeting. If no instructions are given within that time frame, the nominees may vote those shares on matters deemed “routine” by the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Proposals 1 and 2 are non-routine matters and, nominees cannot vote without instructions from the beneficial owner, resulting in so-called “broker non-votes.” Broker non-votes are not counted for the purposes of determining the number of shares present in person or represented by proxy on a voting matter. For these reasons, please promptly vote by telephone, or Internet, or sign, date and return the voting instruction card your broker or nominee has enclosed, in accordance with the instructions on the card.
MAY I CHANGE MY VOTE?
If you arewere a stockholder of record you may revoke your proxy at any time before itas of the close of business on Wednesday, March 13, 2019.
ITEMS OF BUSINESS
1.To elect the seven directors named in the Proxy Statement to our Board of Directors to serve until the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified;
2.To consider and approve an advisory vote to approve Aerojet Rocketdyne’s executive compensation;
3.To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as independent auditors of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2019;
4.To Approve the Company’s 2019 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan;
5.To consider and act on such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Arjun L. Kampani
ARJUN L. KAMPANI
Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of proxy materials for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 9, 2019: The Proxy Statement and the Company’s 2018 Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com



TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
1
PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
4
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES
12
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
19
VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS
25
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
28
ORGANIZATION & COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
30
PROPOSAL 2 - ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE AEROJET ROCKETDYNE’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
31
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
32
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES
45
TERMINATION PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS
53
CEO PAY RATIO
54
PROPOSAL 3 - RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
56
PROPOSAL 4 - APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S 2019 EQUITY AND PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN
58
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
64
MISCELLANEOUS
69
APPENDIX A - USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
A-1
APPENDIX B - AEROJET ROCKETDYNE HOLDINGS INC. 2019 EQUITY AND PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN
B-1




PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information that is voted at the Annual Meeting by:
Returning a signed proxy card bearing a later date;
Sending written notice of revocationprovided in more detail throughout this Proxy Statement. For additional information about these topics, refer to the Company, c/odiscussions contained throughout this document and in the Secretary;Company’s 2018 Annual Report. You should read the full Proxy Statement before casting your vote. This Proxy Statement contains certain non-GAAP (accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America) financial measures, which are identified with asterisks. For more information on these non-GAAP financial measures, see Appendix A.
Submitting a new, proper proxy by telephone, Internet or paper ballot, after the date of the earlier voted proxy; or
Attending the Annual Meeting via the Internet at ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com and voting using the control number we have provided to you.
Annual Stockholders’ Meeting
Time: May 9, 2019, 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time
Record Date: You are entitled to vote if you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on March 13, 2019.
Place: Online at ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com
If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or other nominee. You may also vote at the Annual Meeting via the Internet at ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com if you obtain a legal proxy as described above.
WHAT VOTE IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE EACH PROPOSAL?
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
ProposalsBoard Vote RecommendationPage Reference
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
FOR
each Director Nominee
4
Proposal 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Aerojet Rocketdyne’s Executive CompensationFOR
31
Proposal 3: Ratification of the Appointment of Independent AuditorsFOR
56
Proposal 4: Approval of the Company’s 2019 Equity and Performance Incentive PlanFOR
58
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. Votes cast for a nominee will be counted in favor of election. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count either in favor of, or against, election of a nominee. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of Directors set
1



2018 Performance Highlights
Net sales were impacted by the Board for election.adoption of new revenue recognition guidance effective January 1, 2018.
Proposals 2 and 3 will requireNet sales in 2018 would have been $1,910 million under the affirmative voteprevious revenue guidance.
Increase of the holders of at least a majority of the shares present$126 million in person or representeddefense programs primarily driven by proxy and entitled to vote. Broker non-votes will have no effectincreased deliveries on the outcomeStandard Missile and PAC-3 programs.
Decrease of $95 million in space programs primarily driven by cost growth and performance issues on the voteCommercial Crew Development program and lower deliveries on Proposals the Atlas V program.
Net income increased primarily due to:
Decrease of $45 million in income taxes.
One-time benefit of $43 million from increased recoverability of environmental remediation costs.
Improved contract performance resulting in an increase of $22 million in favorable changes in contract estimates.
Decrease of $16 million in retirement benefits expense.
Cash flow provided by operating activities increased primarily due to:
Improved operating results.
Decrease in retirement benefit cash funding.
(In millions)

charts2019a03.jpg
* These are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information, see Appendix A - Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

2



2018 Executive Compensation Highlights
We have designed our executive compensation program pertaining to the named executive officers (“NEOs”) to attract and 3. Abstentions will haveretain highly qualified executive officers and to directly link pay to performance. In 2018 our strategic goals continued to be focused on improving our financial performance, which resulted in the Organization & Compensation Committee maintaining the same effectperformance measures within our annual incentive plan as a vote against Proposals 2in the previous year. Specifically, the Committee used the following measures for our NEOs within our 2018 annual incentive plan:
Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and 3.pension expense (“EBITDAP”);
DO STOCKHOLDERS HAVE CUMULATIVE VOTING RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO THECash flow from operations;
Aerojet Rocketdyne bookings; and
Certain other goals that include individual performance and accomplishments of each NEO.
The Organization & Compensation Committee also granted NEOs 2018 equity-based compensation in the same form as was granted in 2017, consisting of stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) (25% of award) and performance-based restricted stock (75% of award). The performance-based restricted stock vesting is subject to achievement of performance targets based on the following three metrics: revenue; adjusted EBITDAP; and return on invested capital (“ROIC”). In addition, the 2018 equity-based compensation included two additional components of awards consisting of service-based restricted stock and stock price performance-based restricted stock.
Board of Director Nominees and Committees
   Committee Membership
Name
Age(1)
Director SinceAuditCorporate
Governance &
Nominating		Organization &
Compensation
Kevin P. Chilton642018   
Thomas A. Corcoran742008 MM
Eileen P. Drake522015   
James R. Henderson612008CC 
Warren G. Lichtenstein532008   
Lance W. Lord722015M M
Merrill A. McPeak(2)
822013 MC
Martin Turchin772008MM 
M = Committee Member C = Committee Chairman 
(1)Age as of December 31, 2018.
(2)Gen. McPeak will retire from the Board in 2019 and is not a nominee.



3



PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS?
No. Stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of Directors.

4


WHAT CONSTITUTES A QUORUM?
As of the Record Date, 64,451,783 shares of Common Stock were outstanding. A majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, represented in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum. Shares represented by a proxy that directs that the shares abstain from voting or that a vote be withheld on a matter and broker “non-votes” will be included at the Annual Meeting for quorum purposes. Shares represented by proxy as to which no voting instructions are given as to matters to be voted upon will be included at the Annual Meeting for quorum purposes.
WHAT IS THE COMPANY’S INTERNET ADDRESS?DIRECTORS
The Company’s Internet address is www.AerojetRocketdyne.com. You can access this Proxy StatementSecond Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) provide that the Company’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K at this Internet address. The Company’s filings with the SEC are available freeentire Board of charge via a link from this address. Copies are also available in print to any stockholder or other interested person who requests it by writing to Secretary,Directors (the “Board”) of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., P.O. Box 537012, Sacramento, California 95853-7012.
WILL ANY OTHER MATTERS BE VOTED ON?
As ofa Delaware corporation (“Aerojet Rocketdyne” or the date of this Proxy Statement, our management knows of no other matter that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than those matters discussed in this Proxy Statement. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting and call for a vote of the stockholders, validly executed proxies in the enclosed form will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board.
WHO IS SOLICITING PROXIES UNDER THIS PROXY STATEMENT?
The proxies being solicited hereby are being solicited by our Board. The cost of soliciting proxies in the enclosed form will be borne by the Company. Officers and regular employees of the Company may, but without compensation other than their regular compensation, solicit proxies by further mailing, personal conversations, by telephone, facsimile, or electronic means. The Company will, upon request, reimburse brokerage firms and others for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation material to the beneficial owners of the stock.
ARE THERE DISSENTER’S OR APPRAISAL RIGHTS?
The Company’s stockholders are not entitled to dissenter’s or appraisal rights under Delaware law in connection with any of the Items of Business.

5


PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Company’s Bylaws provide that the entire Board“Company”) shall consist of one or more Directors, the total number thereof to be authorized first by the incorporator of the Company, and thereafter authorizes the Board to determineauthorized by resolution the number of Directors that will constitute the Board by the affirmative vote of a majority of the membersCompany’s directors (“Directors”) then in office. The Board has fixed the number of Directors to be electedserve on the Board at the Annual Meeting at eight.seven.
The Board has proposed the following nominees for election as Directors at the Annual Meeting: Kevin P. Chilton; Thomas A. Corcoran; Eileen P. Drake; James R. Henderson; Warren G. Lichtenstein; Lance W. Lord; Merrill A. McPeak; James H. Perry;Lord and Martin Turchin. Each nominee elected as a Director will continue in office until the next annual meeting of stockholders at which their successor has been elected and qualified, or until his/her resignation, removal from office, or death, whichever is earlier.
Each nominee receiving a plurality of the affirmative votes cast at the Annual Meeting will be elected to the Board. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count either in favor of, or against, the election of a nominee.
The Board recommends a vote FOR the election of these nominees as Directors.
Director Qualifications and Experience
The Board, acting through the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee, seeks a Board that, as a whole, possesses the experience, skills, background and qualifications appropriate to function effectively in light of the Company’s current and evolving business circumstances. The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee reviews the size of the Board, the tenure of its Directors and their skills, backgrounds and experiences in determining the slate of nominees and whether to seek one or more new candidates. The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee seeks directors with established records of significant accomplishments in business and areas relevant to the Company’s strategies. With respect to the nomination of continuing Directors for re-election, the individual’s contributions to the Board are also considered.
All of our Directors bring to our Board a wealth of executive leadership experience derived from their service as executives and, in some cases, chief executive officers of large corporations. They also bring extensive board experience. The process undertaken by the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee in recommending qualified director candidates is described in the Director Nominations section on page 14.17.
Set forth below are the names and ages of the nominees for Directors and their principal occupations at present and for the past five years, as well as their particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Board to conclude that the person should serve as a Director for the Company. There are, to the knowledge of the Company, no agreements or understandings by which these individuals were so selected. No family relationships exist between any Directors or executive officers, as such term is defined in Item 402 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The information concerning the nominees set forth below is given as of December 31, 2015.2018.
THOMAS A. CORCORAN

















4



GENERAL KEVIN P. CHILTON
USAF (Ret.)
Age: 64
Director since 2018
Gen. Chilton has served as president of Chilton & Associates LLC, an aerospace, cyber and nuclear consulting company, since 2011, when he retired from the U.S. Air Force after over 34 years of service completing his career as the Commander, U.S. Strategic Command, where he was responsible for the plans and operations for all U.S. forces conducting strategic nuclear deterrence, space and cyberspace operations. From 2006 to 2007, Gen. Chilton served as Commander of Air Force Space Command, where he was responsible for all Air Force space and nuclear ICBM programs. From 1998 to 2006, Gen. Chilton held a number of positions in the Department of Defense including: Commander of the 9th Reconnaissance Wing; Commander of the 8th Air Force; Deputy Director of Politico-Military Affairs, Asia-Pacific and Middle East; Deputy Director of Programs; and acting Assistant Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force. From 1987 to 1998, he served as a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) Astronaut, participating in three space shuttle flights and as Deputy Program Manager for Operations for the International Space Station Program. Gen. Chilton is also a distinguished graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy, with a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering Science; a Columbia University Guggenheim Fellow with a Master of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering; and a distinguished graduate of the U.S. Air Force pilot training and test pilot schools. Gen. Chilton also was awarded an honorary Doctor of Laws degree from Creighton University.

Current and Former Public Company Directorships
CenturyLink, Inc. - Audit Committee, Risk & Security Committee (Chair)
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation - Audit Committee until 2017
Level 3 Communications, Inc. - Audit Committee, Classified Business and Security Committee (Chair) until 2017
Orbital ATK, Inc. - Audit Committee, Markets & Technology Committee until 2017
Orbital Sciences Corporation - Audit Committee, Markets & Technology until 2015
Other Service
Air Force Academy Falcon Foundation, Trustee
Pikes Peak or Bust Rodeo Foundation, Trustee
Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions, Director since 2008- Compensation Committee (Chair)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories Board of Governors, Member
Sandia National Laboratory Board of Managers, Member
Air Force Academy Association of Graduates, Former Director
The Aerospace Corporation, Former Director
Shafer Corporation, Former Director
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications
Extensive career as a senior military officer with the United States Air Force and as a NASA Astronaut
Significant public company board experience

5



THOMAS A. CORCORAN
Age: 74
Director since 2008
Committee Memberships:
Organization & Compensation Committee
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee
Mr. Corcoran has been President of Corcoran Enterprises, LLC, a management consulting company, since 2001. He also served as Senior Advisor of The Carlyle Group, a private investment firm, from 2001 to 2017. Mr. Corcoran has held a number of senior executive positions, including President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of Gemini Air Cargo, Inc. from 2001 to 2004; President and CEO of Allegheny Teledyne Incorporated from 1999 to 2000; and President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) of Lockheed Martin Corporation’s Electronic Systems and Space & Strategic Missiles sectors from 1993 to 1999. Mr. Corcoran was also elected a corporate officer and rose to the number two position in G.E. Aerospace as Vice President (“VP”) and General Manager of G.E. Aerospace Operations in 1990, after beginning his career with General Electric Company in 1967. Mr. Corcoran has been a Senior Advisor of The Carlyle Group, a private equity investment firm, and the President of Corcoran Enterprises, LLC, a management consulting company, since 2001. Previously Mr. Corcoran was also the President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of Gemini Air Cargo, Inc., a cargo airline owned by The Carlyle Group, from 2001 to 2004. Prior to that, Mr. Corcoran was President and CEO of Allegheny Teledyne Incorporated, a diversified business from 1999 to 2000. Prior to that, Mr. Corcoran was President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) of Lockheed Martin’s Electronics and Space Sectors from 1993 to 1999. Mr. Corcoran began his career in 1967 at General Electric Company in various positions. In 1990, Mr. Corcoran was elected a corporate officer and rose to the number two position in G.E. Aerospace as Vice President and General Manager of G.E. Aerospace Operations. Mr. Corcoran is a director with L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. (and member of the Audit Committee). Mr. Corcoran was a Director with Force Protection, Inc., REMEC, Inc., United Industrial Corporation, ONPATH Technologies, Inc.

6


(Chairman), LaBarge, Inc. (Audit Committee member), ARINC, Inc. (Audit Committee Member), Aer Lingus, Ltd. based in Dublin, Ireland and Serco, Ltd. based in Surry, UK. Mr. Corcoran serves as a director of numerous private and public companies.

Current and Former Company Directorships
L3 Technologies, Inc. - Audit & Ethics Committee, Compensation Committee
ARINC, Inc. until 2013
Other Service
American Ireland Fund, is on the board of trustees of Director
Stevens Institute of Technology, and is a trustee emeritus at Board of Trustees
Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Mr. Corcoran brings to the Board considerableInstitute, Trustee Emeritus
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications
Considerable industry knowledge gained from extensive experience as a senior executive in the aerospace industry. Mr. Corcoran also brings to the Board significantindustry
Significant public company board experience, including service as a director of a Fortune 500 company. Mr. Corcoran currently serves as a membercompany

6



EILEEN P. DRAKE
Age: 52
Director since 2015
Ms. Drake has served as CEO and President of the Company since June 2015. Immediately prior to these roles, she served as the Company’s COO from March 2015 to June 2015. Before joining the Company, Ms. Drake held several senior positions with United Technologies Corporation (“UTC”), a multinational manufacturing conglomerate, from 2003 to 2015, including President of Pratt & Whitney AeroPower’s auxiliary power unit and small turbojet propulsion business from 2012 to 2015. From 1996 to 2003, Ms. Drake managed production operations at both the Ford Motor Company and Visteon Corporation where she was Ford’s product line manager for steering systems and plant manager of Visteon’s fuel system operation. Ms. Drake also served on active duty for seven years as a U.S. Army aviator and airfield commander of Davison Army Airfield in Fort Belvoir, Virginia. She is a distinguished military graduate of the U.S. Army Aviation Officer School and received a Master of Business Administration from Butler University and a Bachelor of Arts from The College of New Rochelle. She also holds commercial and private pilot licenses in both fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft.

Current and Former Public Company Directorships
Woodward, Inc.
Other Service
Aerospace Industries Association, Board of the OrganizationGovernors - Executive Committee & CompensationFinance Committee and as a member of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee. Age 71.
EILEEN P. DRAKE
Director since 2015
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications
Ms. Drake has served as CEO and President of the Company since June 2015. She served as COO of the Company from March 2015 to June 2015. Ms. Drake was previously with United Technologies Corporation (“UTC”) where she served as president of Pratt & Whitney AeroPower’s auxiliary power unit and small turbojet propulsion business. She also served as Vice President of Operations and Vice President of Quality, Environmental, Health & Safety, and Achieving Competitive Excellence for UTC’s Carrier Corporation, as well as for Pratt & Whitney. Prior to joining UTC, Ms. Drake managed production operations at both the Ford Motor Company and Visteon Corporation where she was Ford’s product line manager for steering systems and plant manager of Visteon’s fuel system operation. During her military career, Ms. Drake served on active duty for seven years as a U.S. Army aviator and airfield commander of Davison Army Airfield in Fort Belvoir, Virginia. She is a distinguished military graduate of the U.S. Army Aviation Officer School. She received a Master of Business Administration from Butler University and a Bachelor of Arts from The College of New Rochelle. She also holds commercial and private pilot’s licenses in both fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft. Ms. Drake’s extensive experience provides the Board with significant operational expertise and an in-depth knowledge of theConsiderable aerospace and defense industry. Age 49.industry knowledge and operational expertise
JAMES R. HENDERSONPublic company board experience
Director since 2008
Mr. Henderson was





7



JAMES R. HENDERSON
Age: 61
Director since 2008
Committee Memberships:
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee (Chairman)
Audit Committee (Chairman)
Mr. Henderson has served as CEO of Armor Express, a private designer and manufacturer of body armor solutions, since 2018. From 2016 to 2018, Mr. Henderson served as CEO of Steel Connect, Inc. (formerly known as ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc.) (“Steel Connect”), a private supply-chain management company. From 2013 to 2014, Mr. Henderson served as Acting CEO of School Specialty, Inc., a company that provides education-related products, programs and services. Prior to these positions, Mr. Henderson served a number of roles with Steel Partners LLC, a subsidiary of Steel Partners Holdings L.P. (“SPLP”), and its affiliates from 1999 until 2011. Mr. Henderson’s positions included Managing Director and operating partner of Steel Partners LLC, and CEO, President and COO, and VP of Operations of SPLP’s predecessor entity, WebFinancial Corporation. From 2011 to 2012, Mr. Henderson served as CEO of Point Blank Enterprises, Inc., the successor business to Point Blank Solutions, Inc. (“Point Blank”), where he had previously served as CEO. On April 14, 2010, Point Blank and certain of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. The Chapter 11 petitions are being jointly administered under the caption “In re Point Blank Solutions, Inc., et. al.” Case No. 10-11255, which case is ongoing.

Current and Former Public Company Directorships
School Specialty, Inc., until 2018
Aviat Networks Inc., until 2016
RELM Wireless Corporation (n/k/a Managing Director and operating partner of Steel Partners LLC, a subsidiary of Steel Partners Holdings L.P.BK Technologies, Inc.), a global diversified holding company that owns and operates businesses and has significant interests in leading companies in a variety of industries, including diversified industrial products, energy, defense, banking, insurance, and food products and services, until April 2011. He was associated with Steel Partners LLC and its affiliates from August 1999 until April 2011. Mr. Henderson served as a director of 2015 (Chairman)
DGT Holdings Corp., a manufacturer of proprietary high-voltage power conversion subsystems and components, from November 2003 until December 2011. Mr. Henderson also served as a director of SL Industries, Inc. (“SLI”), a company that designs, manufactures and markets power electronics, motion control, power protection, power quality electromagnetic and specialized communication equipment, from January 2002 to March 2010. Mr. Henderson was an Executive Vice President of SP Acquisition Holdings, Inc. (“SPAH”), a company formed for the purpose of acquiring one or more businesses or assets, from February 2007 until October 2009. He was a director of Angelica Corporation, a provider of healthcare linen management services, from August 2006 to August 2008. Mr. Henderson was a director and CEO of the predecessor entity of Steel Partners Holdings L.P., WebFinancial Corporation (“WebFinancial”), from June 2005 to April 2008, President and COO from November 2003 to April 2008, and was the Vice President of Operations from September 2000 to December 2003. He was also the CEO of WebBank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Steel Partners Holdings L.P., from November 2004 to May 2005. He was a director of ECC International Corp., a manufacturer and marketer of computer controlled simulators for training personnel to perform maintenance and operation procedures on military weapons, from December 1999 to September 2003 and was acting CEO from July 2002 to March 2003. He served as the Chairman of the Board of 2011
Point Blank Solutions, Inc. (“Point Blank”), a designer and manufacturer of protective body armor, from August 2008 until October 2011 CEO from June 2009 until October 2011, and was Acting CEO from April 2009 to May 2009. Mr. Henderson was also the CEO and Chairman of the Board of certain subsidiaries of Point Blank. On April 14, 2010, Point Blank and certain of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. The Chapter 11 petitions are being jointly administered under the caption “In re Point Blank Solutions,(Chairman)
SL Industries, Inc., et. al.” Case No. 10-11255, which case is ongoing. He has served as the CEO of Point Blank Enterprises, Inc., the successoruntil 2010

7
Other Service

Armor Express, Director

to the business of Point Blank, from October 2011 to September 2012. Mr. Henderson serves as aEaston Development Company, LLC (Company subsidiary), Manager of the Board of Managers of Easton Development Company, LLC, a subsidiary of Aerojet Rocketdyne. He served as Acting CEO of School Specialty, Inc., a company that provides education-related products, programs and services from July 2013 to April 2014, and has served as Chairman since June 2013. Mr. Henderson served as a Director of RELM Wireless Corporation from March 2014 to September 2015. Mr. Henderson has served on the Board of Aviat Network since January 2015 and Armor Express since September 2015. Mr. Henderson’s substantial
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications
Extensive business experience advising and managing public companies provides the Board with well-developed leadership skills and ability to promote the best interests of stockholders Mr. Henderson currently serves as the Chairman of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee. Age 58.
WARREN G. LICHTENSTEINSignificant public company board experience
Director since 2008
Mr. Lichtenstein has served as the Chairman of the Board of the general partner of Steel Partners Holdings L.P. since July 15, 2009, and as CEO from July 15, 2009 until February 26, 2013, at which time he became the Executive Chairman. He is also the Chairman and CEO of Steel Partners LLC. He is a Co-Founder of Steel Partners Japan Strategic Fund (Offshore), L.P., a private investment partnership investing in Japan, and Steel Partners China Access I LP, a private equity partnership investing in China. In 1993, he also co-founded Steel Partners II, L.P., a private investment partnership that is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Steel Partners Holdings L.P.

8



WARREN G. LICHTENSTEIN
Age: 53
Director since 2008
Mr. Lichtenstein has served as the Company’s Executive Chairman since 2016, and previously served as the Chairman of the Board from 2013 to 2016. He has served on the boards of more than twenty public companies in his career and held a number of chairman or executive chairman titles. Mr. Lichtenstein has served as the interim CEO of Steel Connect (formerly known as ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc.) since December 2018 and previously from March 2016 until June 2016. Mr. Lichtenstein also served as Chairman of the Board of Steel Connect from March 2013 until June 2016, at which time he was appointed Executive Chairman. Mr. Lichtenstein served as Chairman and CEO of Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc., the general partner of SPLP, from 2009 to 2013, and has served as its Executive Chairman since February 2013. Mr. Lichtenstein is the founder of Steel Partners and has been associated with SPLP and its predecessors and affiliates since 1990.

Current and Former Public Company Directorships
Steel Connect, Inc., Executive Chairman and Interim CEO
Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc., Executive Chairman
Steel Excel Inc. (a subsidiary of SPLP), Chairman (went private in 2017)
Handy & Harman Ltd., a diversified manufacturer (a subsidiary of engineered niche industrial products, since July 2005. He has served as Chairman of the Board of ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc. since March 2013. He has served as a director of SLI since March 2010. He previously served as a director (formerly Chairman of the Board) of SLI from January 2002 to May 2008 and served as CEO from February 2002 to August 2005. Mr. Lichtenstein served as the Chairman of the Board, President and CEO of SPAH from February 2007 until October 2009. Mr. Lichtenstein has served as a director (currently Chairman of the Board) of Steel ExcelSPLP) (went private in 2017)
SL Industries, Inc., a company whoseDirector (acquired by SPLP in 2016)
Other Service
Steel Partners Foundation, Director
Federal Law Enforcement Foundation, Director
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications
Extensive business currently consists of a sports-related segment and an oilfield services segment, since October 2010. He served as a director of WebFinancial from 1996 to June 2005, as Chairman and CEO from December 1997 to June 2005 and as President from December 1997 to December 2003. From May 2001 to November 2007, Mr. Lichtenstein served as a director (formerly Chairman of the Board) of United Industrial Corporation, a company principally focused on the design, production and support of defense systems, which was acquired by Textron Inc. He served as a director of KT&G Corporation, South Korea’s largest tobacco company, from March 2006 to March 2008. Mr. Lichtenstein served as a director of Layne Christensen Company, a provider of products and services for the water, mineral, construction and energy markets, from January 2004 to October 2006. Mr. Lichtenstein is qualified to serve as a director due to his expertiseexperience in corporate finance, record of success in managing private investment funds and his service as a director of, and advisor to,advising a diverse group of public companies. Mr. Lichtenstein currently serves as the Chairman of the Boardcompanies
Significant public company board experience
Significant operation experience in manufacturing, space, defense, banking and a member of the steel business systems






9



GENERAL LANCE W. LORD
USAF (Ret.)
Age: 72
Director since 2015
Committee Memberships:
Audit Committee
Organization & Compensation Committee
Since retiring from the U.S. Air Force in 2006 after 37 years of military service, Gen. Lord has been a Senior Associate of The Four Star Group, LLC, a private aerospace and defense advisory and consulting group, since 2008, and a Senior Associate of HF GlobalNET, LLC, a private communication network company, since 2014. In 2010, Gen. Lord founded L2 Aerospace, LLC, an innovative company to shape and influence the business competition in the dynamic and emerging commercial, civil and defense aerospace markets. While in the military, Gen. Lord held a number of significant posts, including Commander, Air Force Space Command, from 2002 to 2006, during which time he was responsible for the development, acquisition and operation of Air Force space and missile weapon systems. In that position, he led more than 39,700 personnel who provided space and intercontinental ballistic missile combat capabilities to the North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Strategic Command. Gen. Lord also received several prestigious military decorations in his career, including the Distinguished Service Medal and Legion of Merit. He is also the 2014 recipient of the American Astronautical Society’s Military Astronautics Award.

Current and Former Public Company Directorships
Frequency Electronics Corporation - Audit Committee, Compensation Committee. Age 50.Committee
GENERAL LANCE W. LORD
USAF (Ret.)
Other Service
Director since 2015
Gen. Lord retired in April 2006 after 37 years of military service. He last served as Commander, Air Force Space Command during which he was responsible for the development, acquisition and operation of Air Force space and missile weapon systems. He led more than 39,700 personnel who provided space and intercontinental ballistic missile combat capabilities to North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Strategic Command. Gen. Lord currently serves as a member of the Board of the Sletten Construction Company and Marotta Controls Corporation. He is Chairman, Board of Advisors to the National Disaster Radio Authority. Gen. Lord is the CEO and founder of L2 Aerospace, LLC. He is the 2014 recipient of the American Astronautical Society Military Astronautics Award. He is a Senior Associate of the Four Star Group; a member of the Iridium Corporation’s Government Advisory Board; a member of the Board of Advisors for the Challenger Learning Center in Colorado Springs, Colorado; chairman of the Board of Advisors to USO Colorado Springs; a Falcon Foundation Trustee; and President of the LLC, Executive Chairman
Association of Air Force Missileers. Age 69.Missileers, President

Von’s Vision, Executive Board Member
Iridium Corporation, Government Advisory Board Member
Challenger Learning Center, Emeritus Member of Board of Advisors
Falcon Foundation, Trustee
Sletten Construction Company, Director
Marotta Controls Corporation, Director
Boneal Company, Director
Measured Risk, LLC, Director
USO Colorado Springs, Board of Advisors Former Chairman
8


GENERAL MERRILL A. McPEAK
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications
USAF (Ret.)
Director since 2013
Gen. McPeak (USAF, retired) was Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force andExtensive career as a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from October 1990 until October 1994. During this period, he was the senior military officer responsible for organization, training and equipage of a combined active duty, National Guard, Reserve and civilian work force of over 850,000 people serving at 1,300 locations inwith the United States and abroad. As a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he and the other service chiefs were military advisors to the Secretary of Defense, the National Security Council and the President of the United States. Following retirement from active service, Gen. McPeak began a second career in business. Since 1995, Gen. McPeak has been President of McPeak and Associates, a management consulting firm that is active as an investor, advisor and director of early development stage companies. A subsidiary, Lost Wingman Press, recently published Hangar Flying and Below the Zone; the first two books of a planned three-volume memoir. Gen. McPeak has long service as a director of public companies, including Tektronix, Inc. and Trans World Airlines, Inc. He was for several years Chairman of ECC International Corp. His currentAir Force
Significant public company directorships include Lilis Energy, Inc. (since January 29, 2015); Lion Biotechnologies, Inc. (Lead Outside Director and member of the Audit Committee) (f/k/a Genesis Biopharma) (since 2011, and for which he was acting CEO from January to July 2013) focused on immunology for treatment of Stage IV metastatic melanoma; Research Solutions, Inc. (and member of the Audit Committee) (f/k/a Derycz Scientific) (since 2010), publishing and distributing scientific journal articles; and DGT Holdings Corp. (since 2005) (and member of the Audit Committee), a real estate business. He previously served as a director of Miller Energy Resources (Lead Outside Director 2010—2014); Mosquito Consolidated Gold (Chairman, 2011—2012); Point Blank Solutions, Inc. (2008—2011); MathStar, Inc. (2005—2010); QPC Lasers (Vice Chairman, 2006—2009); and Gigabeam Corp. (2004—2009). From 2003 to 2012, Gen. McPeak was Chairman of Ethicspoint, Inc., a Portland, Oregon-based startup that became a leading provider of risk management and compliance software-as-a-service. In February 2012, Ethicspoint was bought by a private equity firm, merged with other companies and rebranded as NAVEX Global. Gen. McPeak remained a board member of NAVEX Global, which was sold again in 2014 for a price that established it as the most successful business startup in recent Oregon history. From 2012 to 2014, he was Chairman of Coast Plating, Inc., a Los Angeles-based, privately held provider of metal processing and finishing services, primarily to the aerospace industry. Coast Plating was acquired by Private Equity, renamed Valence Surface Technologies, and is now the largest privately held firm of its kind in the country. Gen. McPeak remains a Director. Gen. McPeak received a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from San Diego State College and a Master of Science degree in international relations from George Washington University. In 1992, San Diego State University honored Gen. McPeak with its first ever Lifetime Achievement Award. In 1995, George Washington University gave him its Distinguished Alumni Award, the “George.” He was among the initial seven inductees to the Oregon Aviation Hall of Honor. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, New York City. In 2008 and 2009, Gen. McPeak was a national co-chairman of Obama for President. In 2011, he became Chairman of the American Battle Monuments Commission, the federal agency that oversees care and maintenance of 24 cemeteries abroad that constitute the final resting place for almost 125,000 American war dead. Gen. McPeak brings to the Board extensive experience in management consulting and a successful military career, including his position as Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force and a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Gen. McPeak currently serves as a member of the Organization & Compensation Committee and as a member of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee. Age 79.
JAMES H. PERRY
Director since 2008
Mr. Perry, until his retirement in 2008, served as Vice President of United Industrial Corporation, which, through its wholly-owned subsidiary AAI Corporation, designs, produces and supports aerospace and defense systems, from 1998 to 2007, as Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) from 1995 to 2007, as Treasurer from 1994 to 2005, and as Controller from 2005 to 2007. Mr. Perry served as CFO of AAI Corporation from 2000 to 2007, as Treasurer from 2000 to 2005, and as Vice President from 1997 to 2007. Mr. Perry, a certified public accountant, held various positions in the Assurance practice of Ernst & Young LLP, a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services, from 1987 to 1994. Mr. Perry’s qualifications which encompass his executive leadership skills in the aerospace and defense industry and experience as a certified public accountant including his tenure with a major accounting firm servicing numerous




910



publically traded companies provides the Board with sophisticated financial expertise and oversight. Mr. Perry currently serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee. Age 54.
MARTIN TURCHIN
MARTIN TURCHIN
Age: 77
Director since 2008
Committee Memberships:
Audit Committee
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee
Mr. Turchin has been a non-executive Vice Chairman of CBRE Group, Inc. (“CBRE”), the world’s largest real estate services company, since 2003. Prior to this role, Mr. Turchin held senior positions with numerous real estate firms, serving as a Vice Chairman of a subsidiary of Insignia Financial Group from 1996 to 2003; a principal and Vice Chairman of Edward S. Gordon Company from 1985 to 1996, and in various positions with Kenneth E. Laub & Company, Inc., a real estate company where he was involved in real estate acquisition, financing, leasing and consulting, from 1971 to 1985. Mr. Turchin holds a Bachelor of Science degree from City College of the University of New York and a Juris Doctor degree from St. John’s Law School.

Current and Former Public Company Directorships
Mr. Turchin is a Vice Chairman of CB Richard Ellis, the world’s largest real estate services company, a position he has held since 2003. Previously, Mr. Turchin served as a Vice Chairman of a subsidiary of Insignia Financial Group, a real estate brokerage, consulting and management firm from 1996 to 2003. Prior to that, Mr. Turchin was a principal and Vice Chairman of Edward S. Gordon Company, a real estate brokerage, consulting and management firm from 1985 to 1996. Mr. Turchin has been a director of Boston Properties, a real estate investment trust, for more than ten years. Mr. Turchin held various positions with Kenneth E. Laub &Inc. - Audit Committee
Other Service
Eastern Development Company, Inc.LLC (a Company subsidiary), a real estate company, where he was involved in real estate acquisition, financing, leasing and consulting from 1971 to 1985. Mr. Turchin also serves as a trustee for the Turchin Family Charitable Foundation. Mr. Turchin serves as a Manager of the Board of Managers of Easton Development Company, LLC, a subsidiary of Aerojet Rocketdyne. Mr. Turchin’s considerable
Turchin Family Charitable Foundation, Trustee
Attributes, Skills and Qualifications
Extensive experience and expertise in the real estate industry and service as a director of
Significant public companies provides thecompany board with valuable expertise in real estate matters and experience in advising companies. Mr. Turchin currently serves as a member of the Audit Committee and as a member of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee. Age 74.
The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR each of these nominees as Directors by executing and returning the proxy card or voting by one of the other ways indicated thereon. Proxies solicited by the Board will be so voted unless stockholders specify otherwise.

11



INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES
Voting for Directors
The Company has no provision for cumulative voting in the election of Directors. Therefore, holders of the Company’s common stock (“Common StockStock”) are entitled to cast one vote for each share held on the Record Date for each of the candidates for election. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting,Meeting; however, the Board has adopted a majority vote policy. Pursuant to such policy, in an uncontested election, any nominee for Director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” for his election than votes “for” such election (a “Majority Withheld Vote”) shall promptly tender his resignation after such election for consideration by the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee. In determining its recommendation to the Board, the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee will consider all factors deemed relevant by its members. These factors may include the underlying reasons why stockholders “withheld” votes for election from such Director (if ascertainable), the length of service and qualifications of the Director whose resignation has been tendered, the Director’s contributions to the Company, whether by accepting such resignation the Company will no longer be in compliance with any applicable law, rule, regulation or governing document and whether or not accepting the resignation is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders. Within 90 days thereafter, the Board, taking into account the recommendation of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee and such additional information and factors that the Board believes to be relevant, must determine whether to accept or reject the resignation. The Director that tendered the resignation shall not participate in the consideration or determination of whether to accept such resignation. The Board shall disclose by press release its decision to accept or reject the resignation and, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the resignation. If a majority of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee members receive a Majority Withheld Vote at the same election, then the independent Directors who did not receive a Majority Withheld Vote will appoint a committee of independent Directors to consider the resignation offers and recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject them.
Votes cast for a nominee will be counted in favor of election. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count either in favor of, or against, election of a nominee. It is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy to vote for the election of the Board’s nominees, unless authorization to do so is withheld. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of Directors set by the Board for election. If, prior to the Annual Meeting, a nominee becomes unable to serve as a Director for any reason, the proxy holders reserve the right to

10


substitute another person of their choice in such nominee’s place and stead. It is not anticipated that any nominee will be unavailable for election at the Annual Meeting.
Retirement Policy
The Company does not have a mandatory retirement policy for Directors.
Meetings of the Board
The Board held 18seven meetings during fiscal 2015.2018. All of the Directors who served during fiscal 20152018 attended at least 75% of the regularly scheduled and special meetings of the Board and Board committees on which they served and to which they were invited in fiscal 2015.2018. All of the Board’s nominees for election at the Annual Meeting are expected to attend the Annual Meeting. All of the Directors nominated for election at the 20152018 annual meeting of stockholders were present at such meeting.
Meetings of Non-Employee Directors
Non-employee Directors (consists(consisting of all Directors other than Mr. Lichtenstein and Ms. Drake), all of whom are independent, meet in executive session as part of each regularly scheduled Board meeting. In 2015,The presiding Director position at each such executive session is rotated in alphabetical order among the Chairmannon-employee Directors.

12



Board Leadership Structure
The Company determines the most suitable leadership structure pursuant to its Certificate of Incorporation, the Bylaws and corporate governance guidelines. At least annually, as part of the Board’s self-evaluation process, the Board presided at all such executive sessions. Inevaluates the event ofCompany’s leadership structure to confirm that it provides the Chairman’s absence, another non-employee Director is chosen to preside.
Board Leadership Structureoptimal structure for the Company and its stockholders.
In February 2007, as part of its ongoing commitment to corporate governance, the Board made a decision to separate the positions of Chairman of the Board from CEO and CEO.President. Prior to February 2007, the positionsposition of Chairman of the Board and the position of CEO and President were historically held by the same person. Since March 2007,
In June 2016, the Board has appointed a non-executivedecided to serve ascreate an Executive Chairman of the Board. The Company’s Bylaws allowBoard (“Executive Chairman”) role. Currently, Warren Lichtenstein is our Executive Chairman and Eileen Drake is our CEO and President. We believe this structure is the Board to elect a Chairman from among all ofmost advantageous for the Directors, and therefore the Board has the flexibility to choose whether to elect a non-executive Chairman, who would not be an officerCompany at this time as Mr. Lichtenstein’s financial acumen, knowledge of the Company or have one person serveand business contacts are valuable as an executive in both capacities.a management capacity.
Pursuant to the Company’s corporate governance guidelines, the duties of the non-executiveExecutive Chairman include, among other things, supporting the CEO and President in implementing and executing Company strategy.
All of the Company’s other Directors are independent, including the chair and members of each of the Company’s Audit Committee, Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee and Organization & Compensation Committee. While the Board has not formally appointed a lead independent Director, the Board believes that the current composition of the Board include:
preparingand the agenda for Board meetings in consultation with the CEO;
presiding over all meetings of the stockholders and Board, including all executive sessionsfunctioning of the independent Directors;
serving as liaison between the CEO and the Board;
collaborating with senior management to provide timely information to the Board; and
collaborating with the Organization & Compensation Committee to review the performanceDirectors effectively maintain oversight of the CEO.
As directors continue to have increasingly more oversight responsibilities, the Company believes it is beneficial to have an independent Chairman whose sole responsibility is leading the Board, leaving the CEO’s main focus on the Company’s business goals and promoting both short-term and long-term growth.
Pursuant to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws and corporate governance guidelines, the Board determines the leadership structure of the Company. As part of the Board’s annual self-evaluation process, the Board evaluates the Company’s leadership structure to ensure that it provides the optimal structure for the Company and stockholders. At this time, the Board believes the current leadership structure, with Ms. Drake serving as CEO and Mr. Lichtenstein serving as Chairman of the Board, is the most advantageous for the Company.management. However, the Board recognizes that there is no single, generally accepted approach to providing corporate leadership, and the Company’s leadership structure may change in the future as circumstances warrant.
Board Role in Risk Oversight
Management has the primary responsibility for identifying and managing the risks facing the Company, subject to the oversight of the Board. The Board strives to effectively oversee the Company’s enterprise-wide risk management in a way that balances managing risks while enhancing the long-term value of the Company for the benefit of the

11


stockholders. The Board understands that its focus on effective risk oversight is critical to setting the Company’s tone and culture towards effective risk management.
To administer its oversight function, the Board seeks to understand the Company’s risk philosophy by having discussions with management to establish a mutual understanding of the Company’s overall appetite for risk. The Company’s Board maintains an active dialogue with management about existing risk management processes and how management identifies, assesses and manages the Company’s most significant risk exposures. The Company’s Board receives frequent updates from management about the Company’s most significant risks so as to enable it to evaluate whether management is responding appropriately.
The Board relies on each of its committees to help oversee the risk management responsibilities relating to the functions performed by such committees.
The Audit Committee periodically reviews and discusses with management the Company’s guidelines and policies with respect to the process by which the Company undertakes risk assessment and risk management including discussion of the Company’s major financial and compliance risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures,exposures. The Audit Committee also reviews and assists the Board in overseeing the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including the effectiveness of the Company’s risk assessmentcorporate Ethics and risk management policies. Compliance Program.
The Organization & Compensation Committee helps the Board to identify the Company’s exposure to any risks potentially created by our compensation programs and practices.
The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee oversees risks relating to the Company’s corporate compliance programsperiodically reviews and assistsadvises the Board regarding significant matters of public policy, including proposed actions by foreign and management in promoting an organizational culturedomestic governments that encourages commitment to ethical conduct and a commitment to compliance withmay significantly affect the law. Company.

13



Each of these committees is required to regularly report on its actions and to make recommendations to the Board, including recommendations to assist the Board with its overall risk oversight function. The Board retains oversight responsibility for all subject matters not specifically assigned to a committee, including risks presented by the Company’s business strategy, competition, regulation, general industry trends and capital structure.
The Organization & Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s compensation policies and practices are structured to discourage inappropriate risk taking by our executives and that none of the Company’s compensation policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company believes that its compensation plans effectively balance risk and reward and are generally uniform in design and operation throughout the Company.
Determination of Independence of Directors
The Board has determined that to be considered independent, a Director may not have a direct or indirect material relationship with the Company. A material relationship is one which impairs or inhibits, or has the potential to impair or inhibit, a Director’s exercise of critical and disinterested judgment on behalf of the Company and its stockholders.
In making its assessment of independence, the Board considersBoard:
Considers any and all material relationships not merely from the standpoint of the Director, but also from that of persons or organizations with which the Director has or has had an affiliation, or those relationships which may be material, including commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships, among others. others;
The Board also considers whether a Director was an employee of the Company within the last five years. three years;
The Board consults with the Company’s counsel to ensure that the Board’s determinations are consistent with all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of “independent” Director, including those set forth in pertinent listing standards of the NYSENew York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) as in effect from time to time.
The NYSE’s listing standards require that all listed companies have a majority of independent directors. For a director to be “independent” under the NYSE listing standards, the board of directors of a listed company must affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with the company, or its subsidiaries or affiliates, either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company or its subsidiaries or affiliates. In accordance with the NYSE listing standards, the Board has affirmatively determined that each of the Board’s current Directors and nominees for Director, other than Mr. Lichtenstein and Ms. Drake, have no material relationships with the Company, either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company.
To determineCompany and are “independent” by the independence of its Directors, the Company examined the following NYSE listing standards, which provide that a director is not independent if:
the director is, or has been within the last three years, an employeestandards. In addition, during his term of the listed Company, or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of the listed Company;
the director has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from the listed Company, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service, (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);
(a) the director is a current partner or employee of a firm that is the listed Company’s internal or external auditor; (b) the director has an immediate family member who is a current partner of such a firm; (c) the director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and personally works on the listed Company’s audit; or (d) the director or an immediate family memberformer Director James H. Perry was within the last three years

12


(but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on the listed Company’s audit within that time;
the director or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of the listed Company’s present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee; or
the director is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to or received payments from, the listed Company for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other listed Company’s consolidated gross revenues.
Each of the Board’s nominees, other than Ms. Drake, has been determined to be “independent” by the NYSE listing standards.

14



Board Committees
The Board maintains three standing committees: the Audit Committee; the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee; and the Organization & Compensation Committee. In addition, non-standing committees include the Pricing Committee, the Authorization Committee, and the Benefits Management Committee. Assignments to, and chairs of, the standing committees are recommended by the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee and approved by the Board. All committees report on their activities to the Board. Each standing committee operates under a charter approved by the Board. The charters for each of the standing committees are posted on the Company’s website at www.AerojetRocketdyne.com and are available in print to any stockholder or interested party who requests them by writingsends a written request to Secretary, Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., P.O. Box 537012, Sacramento,222 N. Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 500, El Segundo, California 95853-7012.90245. In addition, non-standing committees of the Board include the Authorization Committee (which was disbanded December 12, 2018) and the Benefits Management Committee.
The following table provides the membership and total number of meetings held by each standing committee of the Board in fiscal 2015:2018:
NameAudit
Corporate
Governance &
Nominating
Organization &
Compensation
Thomas A. Corcoran X X 
James R. HendersonX   X* 
Warren G. Lichtenstein  X 
Lance W. LordX  
Merrill A. McPeak X   X*
James H. Perry  X* X 
Martin TurchinX X  
Total meetings in fiscal 2015728
NameAuditCorporate
Governance &
Nominating		Organization &
Compensation
Kevin P. Chilton
Thomas A. CorcoranMM
James R. HendersonMC
Lance W. LordMM
Merrill A. McPeak(1)
MC
James H. Perry(2)
CM
Martin TurchinMM
M = Committee Member C = Committee Chairman
(1)Gen. McPeak is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting.
(2)Mr. Perry resigned from the Board effective November 16, 2018. Mr. Henderson was appointed Chairman of the Audit Committee following Mr. Perry’s departure effective December 12, 2018.

15



Following are the descriptions of each of the three standing committees and the number of meetings held by each in 2018:
*Audit CommitteeCommittee ChairmanNumber of meetings in 2018: 6
Roles and Responsibilities
reviews and evaluates the scope of the audits to be performed by, the adequacy of services performed by, and the fees and compensation of, the independent auditors;
reviews the Company’s disclosure of the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” and annual audited and quarterly financial statements with management and with the Company’s independent auditors and recommends to the Board to include the financial statements in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K or the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as applicable;
approves in advance all audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors;
reviews and considers matters that may have a bearing upon continuing audit or independence; prepares the report of the Audit Committee to be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement;
appoints and terminates the independent auditors of the Company;
reviews and evaluates the scope and appropriateness of the Company’s internal audit function, internal audit plans and system of internal controls;
reviews and evaluates with management and independent auditors their judgment about the Company’s selection or application of accounting principles, practices and financial reporting;
receives periodic reports from management, legal counsel, the Company’s corporate Ethics and Compliance Office and third parties as determined by the Committee; and
reviews and oversees the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including the effectiveness of the Company’s corporate Ethics and Compliance Program.
The Audit Committee is a separately designated standing committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets all applicable independence and financial literacy requirements under the NYSE listing standards. The Board has also determined that Mr. PerryHenderson is an “audit committee financial expert” under the applicable rules promulgated pursuant to the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee reviews
Corporate Governance & Nominating CommitteeNumber of meetings in 2018: 4
Roles and evaluates the scope of the audits to be performed by, the adequacy of services performed by, and the fees and compensation of, the independent auditors. The Audit Committee also reviews the Company’s audited financial statements with management and with the Company’s independent auditors and recommends to the Board to include the audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K; approves in advance all audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors; reviews and considers matters that may have a bearing upon continuing audit or independence; prepares the report of the Audit Committee to be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement; appoints the independent auditors to examine the consolidated financial statements of the Company; reviews and evaluates the scope and appropriateness of the Company’s internal audit function, internal audit plans and system of internal controls; reviews and evaluates the appropriateness of the

13


Company’s selection or application of accounting principles, practices and financial reporting; receives periodic reports from the internal audit and law departments; and reviews and oversees the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including the effectiveness of the Company’s corporate Ethics and Compliance Program.Responsibilities
The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee periodically reviews and makes recommendations to the Board concerning the criteria for selection and retention of Directors, the composition of the Board (including the Chairman of the Board), the structure and function of Board committees and the retirement policy of Directors. The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee also Directors;
assists in identifying, screening and recommendsrecommending to the Board qualified candidates to serve as Directors of the Company and considers and makes recommendations to the Board concerning Director nominations submitted by stockholders. The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee also stockholders;
periodically reviews and advises the Board regarding significant matters of public policy, including proposed actions by foreign and domestic governments that may significantly affect the Company; and
reviews and advises the Board regarding adoption or amendment of major Company policies and programs relating to matters of public policy.
The Board has determined that each member of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee meets all applicable independence requirements under the NYSE listing standards.
The Organization & Compensation Committee advises
16



Organization & Compensation CommitteeNumber of meetings in 2018: 9
Roles and recommends to the independent DirectorsResponsibilities
reviews and approves the total compensation of the CEO and President. The Organization & Compensation Committee delegated to the former President and CEO the final authority to establish the 2015 base salaries of the other executives of the Company within limits previously reviewed by the Organization & Compensation Committee with the former President and CEO. The Organization & Compensation Committee also Executive Chairman;
administers the Company’s deferred compensation plan, the Aerojet Rocketdyne 2018 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the “2018 Incentive Plan”) and the Aerojet Rocketdyne Amended and Restated 2009 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the “2009 Incentive Plan”). The Organization & Compensation Committee ;
periodically reviews the organization of the Company and its management, including major changes in the organization of the Company and the responsibility of management as proposed by the CEO; CEO and President;
monitors executive development and succession planning;
reviews the effectiveness and performance of senior management, and reviews and makes recommendations to the Board concerning the appointment and removal of officers;
periodically reviews the compensation philosophy, policies and practices of the Company and makes recommendations to the Board concerning proposed major changes, as appropriate;
annually reviews changes in the Company’s employee benefit, savings and retirement plans and reports thereon to the Board; and
approves, and in some cases recommends to the Board for approval, the compensation of executive officers and executives of the Company. TheCompany, although the Organization & Compensation Committee alsodelegates to the CEO and President the right to establish the salaries and annual incentive compensation of the other officers of the Company; and
periodically reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding the compensation and benefits for Directors.
The Board has determined that each member of the Organization & Compensation Committee meets all applicable independence requirements under the NYSE and SECthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) listing standards. In making its determination, the Board considered all factors specifically relevant to determining whether a directorDirector has a relationship to the Company which is material to that director’sDirector’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of an Organization & Compensation Committee member, including but not limited to, (i) the source of the director’sDirector’s compensation, including any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fees paid by the Company; and (ii) whether the directorDirector has an affiliate relationship with the Company.
From time to time, the Board forms special committees to address specific matters.
Director Nominations
The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee identifies potential directorDirector candidates through a variety of means, including recommendations from members of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee, the Board, management and stockholders. The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee also may retain the services of a consultant to assist in identifying candidates. The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee will consider nominations submitted by stockholders. A stockholder who would like to recommend a nominee should write to the Chairman of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee, c/o Secretary, Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., P.O. Box 537012, Sacramento,222 N. Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 500, El Segundo, California 95853-7012.90245. Any such recommendation must meet all of the requirements contained in the Company’s Bylaws and include (i) all information relating to the person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for the election of directors or is otherwise required, pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;Act; and (ii) the candidate’s signed consent to be named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee and to serve as a Director if elected.

14


Such nominations must be received by the Chairman of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee no later than the close of business on January 27, 2017,February 9, 2020, nor earlier than the close of business on December 28, 2016.January 10, 2020.

17



The Company’s Bylaws contain advance notice provisions that a stockholder must follow if he, she or it intends to make a director nomination before a meeting of stockholders. These advance notice provisions provide, among other things that:
•
for an annual meeting of stockholders, written notice of a stockholder’s intention to make business proposals or nominate persons for election to the Board must be delivered to the Company not later than the ninetieth (90th) day or earlier than the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. If an annual meeting of stockholders is held more than thirty (30) days before or more than seventy (70) days after the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, notice by the stockholder must be delivered (i) not earlier than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to such annual meeting; and (ii) not later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement is first made of the date of the annual meeting; and
•
if the Company has called a special meeting for the purpose of electing one or more directors to the Board, written notice of a stockholder’s intention to nominate persons for election to the Board before such special meeting must be delivered to the Company (i) not earlier than the one hundred twentieth (120th) day; and (ii) not later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to such special meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement is first made of the date of the special meeting and of the nominees proposed by the Board to be elected at such meeting.
The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee seeks to create a Board that is, as a whole, strong in its collective knowledge and diversity of skills and experience and background with respect to accounting and finance, management and leadership, business judgment, industry knowledge and corporate governance. Although the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee does not have a formal diversity policy relating to the identification and evaluation of nominees, the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee, in addition to reviewing a candidate’s qualifications and experience in light of the needs of the Board and the Company at that time, reviews candidates in the context of the current composition of the Board and the evolving needs of the Company’s businesses.
Communications with Directors
Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board or individual Directors by mail addressed to: Chairman of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee, c/o Secretary, Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., P.O. Box 537012, Sacramento,222 N. Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 500, El Segundo, California 95853-7012.90245. The Secretary may initially review communications to the Board or individual Directors and transmit a summary to the Board or individual Directors, but has discretion to exclude from transmittal any communications that are, in the reasonable judgment of the Secretary, inappropriate for submission to the intended recipient(s). Examples of communications that would be considered inappropriate for submission to the Board or a Director include, without limitation, customer complaints, solicitations, commercial advertisements, communications that do not relate directly or indirectly to the Company’s business or communications that relate to improper or irrelevant topics.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The Organization & Compensation Committee is composed entirely of non-employee independent Directors. As of November 30, 2015,December 31, 2018, the members of the Organization & Compensation Committee included Merrill A. McPeak (Chairman), Thomas A. Corcoran Warren G. Lichtenstein and James H. Perry.Lance W. Lord. Mr. Perry was a member of the Organization & Compensation Committee before his retirement from the Board on November 16, 2018. All non-employee independent Directors on the Organization & Compensation Committee participate in decisions regarding the compensation of the CEO and President. None of the Company’s executive officers serve as a member of the Boardboard of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of the Company’s Organization & Compensation Committee. In addition, none of the Company’s executive officers serve as a member of the Organization & Compensation Committee of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of the Company’s Board.


1518



Director CompensationDIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The compensation of the Company’s non-employee Directors is determined by the Board upon the recommendations made by the Organization & Compensation Committee. The current Director compensation program for non-employee Directors was implementedupdated by the Company in 2013November 2017 after evaluation of the recommendations by Hay Group, Inc. (“Korn Ferry (formerly “Korn Ferry Hay Group”) who, the company that was retained by the Organization & Compensation Committee as outside consultants to assess the overall compensation structure for its non-employee Directors subsequent to the acquisition of the Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne division (the “Rocketdyne Business”) of UTC.Directors. Specifically, the Organization & Compensation Committee requested Hay Group tothat Korn Ferry measure the Company’s directorDirector compensation (in total and by pay component) against similarly sized U.S. companies in the aerospace and defense industry based on information disclosed in recent SEC filings, and in the broader general industry, using both proprietary compensation surveys and its knowledge of industry practices. Hay GroupDirector pay was benchmarked at the median level. In November 2017, Korn Ferry recommended and the Organization & Compensation Committee approved certain changes to the Director compensation program for non-employee Directors to recognize the increased size, scalemaintain competitiveness and complexity of the new Aerojet Rocketdyne organization.aid in director recruitment. These changes were effective beginning on November 13, 2013.15, 2017. The Director compensation program is more fully described below.
Director Compensation Components
Annual Retainer Fees and Stock Awards
UnderAnnual fees and awards under our Director compensation program effective beginning November 2013, and for the Company’s most recently ended fiscal year, each non-employee Director will receive an annual retainer fee of $55,000, with the exception of the Chairman of the Board who receives an annual retainer fee of $110,000. Each non-employee Director will receive $7,500 for service on the Corporate Governance & Nominating or the Organization & Compensation Committees and $10,000 for service on the Audit Committee. Each non-employee Director willDirectors are summarized below:
ComponentAnnual Amount ($)
Annual retainer$70,000
Members of each of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee, and the Organization & Compensation Committee7,500
Chairmen of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee, and the Organization & Compensation Committee*10,000
Members of the Audit Committee10,000
Chairman of the Audit Committee*15,000
Members of a long-term special committee5,000
Members of a limited purpose special committee3,250
Managers on the Board of Managers of Easton Development Company, LLC15,000
Annual award of restricted stock100,000
* Committee chairmen also receive $5,000 for service on a long-term specialthe committee and although the Company does not currently have any limited-purpose special committees, in the event that one is created the members would receive $3,250 for service on such a committee. Non-employee Directors who served as Chairman of the Organization & Compensation Committee or Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee will receive an additional annual fee of $10,000 and the Chairman of the Audit Committee will receive an additional $15,000. Non-employee Directors who attend Board meetings in excess of six meetings between any two annual meetings of stockholders will receive $2,000 per each additional Board meeting and non-employee Directors who attend meetings of any single standing or long-term special committee meetings held in excess of six meetings between any two annual meetings of stockholders will receive $1,500 per each additional committee meeting. The annual cash compensation for each non-employee Director serving as a Manager on the Board of Managers of Easton Development Company, LLC is $15,000.membership retainer.
Non-employee Directors are given a choice to receive all such Director fees in cash or receivingto receive all or part,a portion, but no less than 50%, of such fees in the form of fully vested Company Common Stock, calculated based on the closing price of the Common Stock as reported in the NYSE Composite Transactions (or if such information in such source is unavailable, a source providing similar information selected by the Company) as of the applicable Director pay date, pursuant to the 2009 Incentive Plan and the 2018 Incentive Plan. If a non-employee Director elects for any year to receive all or a portion of such fees in the form of fully vested Common Stock, an additional grant of restricted shares of Common Stock will be given equal in value to 50% of the amount of fees paid in fully vested Common Stock vesting on the earlier of the Director’s retirement from service from the Board or one year from the date of grant. Non-employee Directors and the Executive Chairman also have a choice to defer all or a portion of fully vested and restricted shares of Common Stock. Distribution of deferred stock can be made in a single payment or at least two but no more than 10 annual installments, with a choice to begin distribution 30 days following retirement from the Board, on a date specified by the participant, or upon attainment of an age specified by the participating director.Director.

1619



Equity Grants
In March 2015,May 2018, each non-employee Director received $90,000 worth of equity compensation, with the exception of the Chairman of the Board, who received $210,000$100,000 worth of equity compensation pursuant to the 20092018 Incentive Plan. This grant consisted of 3,8803,588 restricted shares of Common Stock for each non-employee Directors other than the Chairman of the Board, who received 9,055 restricted shares of Common Stock.Director. These awards vest in 50% increments on the six-month and twelve-month anniversaryanniversaries of the grant date. Non-employee Directors also receive a one-time awardIn October 2018, Gen. Chilton received $50,000 worth of 500equity compensation upon election to the Board. This grant consisted of 1,652 restricted shares of Common Stock as partwhich vest in 50% increments on the six-month and twelve-month anniversaries of their initial election to the Board.grant date. All restricted shares of Common Stock may be voted, but ownership may not transfer until such shares are vested. Unless otherwise approved by the Board, unvested shares will be forfeited in the event of a voluntary resignation or refusal to stand for re-election.
Non-employee Directors also receive 500 shares of restricted stock upon their initial election to the Board.
Other
The Aerojet Rocketdyne Foundation matches employee and Director gifts to accredited, non-profit colleges, universities, secondary and elementary public or private schools located in the United States. Gifts made are matched dollar for dollar up to $1,000 per calendar year.
Non-employee Directors may also elect to participate in the same health benefits programs at the same cost as offered to all of the Company’s employees. The Company also reimburses Directors for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred in attending Board and Committee meetings.
Equity Ownership Guidelines for Non-employeeNon-Employee Directors
In October 2007, the Board adopted equity ownership guidelines that were subsequently revised in November 2013 under which non-employee Directors are required to own equity in the Company in an amount equal to $275,000. On February 28, 2019, the equity ownership guidelines were revised to require non-employee Directors to own equity in the Company in an amount equal to five times thetheir annual cash retainer or $275,000.retainer. In calculating the amount of equity owned by a Director, the Board looks at the value of Common Stock owned by such Director (restricted stock and stock owned outright), the value of any phantom stock owned by such Director as part of the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, if any and the value of any vested “in the money” options or Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”)SARs (i.e. market value of Company stock in excess of the strike price for the stock option or SAR). Directors have five years from the date of their election to the Board to meet the thresholds set forth in these equity ownership guidelines. The Board routinely reviews these guidelines and considers adjustments when appropriate, including adjustments for material fluctuations in the Company’s stock price.
As of November 30, 2015, not allDecember 31, 2018, most of the non-employee Directors held equity in the Company equal in market value to the guidelines in place at the time. However,time and those that do not meet the requirements are in the transition period set forth in the guidelines and are anticipated to meet the guidelines by the end of the transition period. The following table shows the current status of equity ownership for each non-employee Director as of November 30, 2015.December 31, 2018.
Name
Value of Equity
Ownership*
Date of ElectionYears as a Director
Thomas A. Corcoran$2,458,568
09/24/20087.2
James R. Henderson3,532,972
03/05/20087.7
Warren G. Lichtenstein3,438,677
03/05/20087.7
Lance W. Lord110,064
02/02/20150.8
Merrill A. McPeak565,723
03/27/20132.7
James H. Perry3,363,511
05/16/20087.5
Martin Turchin3,169,151
03/05/20087.7
Name
Value of Equity
Ownership*
Date of Election
Years as a 
Director
Kevin P. Chilton$101,498
10/30/20180.2
 
Thomas A. Corcoran4,097,283
09/24/200810.3
 
James R. Henderson3,967,849
03/05/200810.8
 
Lance W. Lord970,727
02/02/20153.9
 
Merrill A. McPeak2,390,460
03/27/20135.8
 
Martin Turchin4,880,958
03/05/200810.8
 
* Value is based on the stock price on December 31, 2018, of $35.23.
*Value is based on the stock price on November 30, 2015Compensation of $17.54.Executive Chairman
Other
The Aerojet Rocketdyne Foundation matches employee and Director gifts to accredited, non-profit colleges, universities, secondary and elementary publicMr. Lichtenstein was appointed as our Executive Chairman on June 24, 2016. Mr. Lichtenstein received no compensation or private schools locatedequity grants in the United States. Gifts made were matched dollar for dollar up to $3,000 per calendar year.
Non-employee Directors may also elect to2017 or 2018. Further, he does not participate in the same health benefitscompensation programs atthat are provided to our other executive officers. On August 19, 2016, the same cost as offered to allBoard upon the recommendation of the Company’s employees.Advisory and the Organization & Compensation Committees, approved a compensation package for Mr. Lichtenstein to cover his compensation as Executive Chairman for a period of two years. The Company also reimburses Directors for reasonable travelcomponents and other expenses incurred in attending Board and Committee meetings.

1720



2015 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth information regardingdetails of Mr. Lichtenstein’s compensation earned or paid to each non-employee Director who servedare as provided in the Company’s 2018 Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on March 29, 2018.
On February 28, 2019, the Board upon the recommendation of the Advisory and Organization & Compensation Committees, approved the following grants pursuant to the Company’s 2018 Incentive Plan to Mr. Lichtenstein:    
(i)49,158 shares of time-based restricted stock vesting in 1/3 increments on February 28, 2020, February 28, 2021 and February 28, 2022 (subject to continued service through each such date), having an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $1.8 million;
(ii)200,000 stock appreciation rights with a grant price of $37.25 exercisable on February 28, 2022 (subject to continued service through such date) and expiring on February 28, 2026 having an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $2.6 million; and
(iii)an option to purchase 91,229 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with a grant price of $37.25 exercisable on February 28, 2022 (subject to continued service through such date) and expiring on February 28, 2026 having an aggregate grant date fair value of approximately $1.2 million.
The aforementioned grants were determined reasonable compensation for Mr. Lichtenstein’s continued service as our Executive Chairman based on his skills and experience and are intended to cover Mr. Lichtenstein’s compensation, in fiscal 2015. Employee Directors arelieu of salary, for the period from August 2018 until December 2018 during which he did not compensatedreceive any compensation, and for serviceshis continued service through the end of 2019.
Equity Ownership Guidelines for the Executive Chairman
The Organization & Compensation Committee has share ownership guidelines that apply to executive officers which apply to the Executive Chairman. Under these guidelines, the Executive Chairman is expected to have equity in the Company equal in aggregate market value to six times the CEO base salary. See Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines on page 41 for an explanation of how equity ownership is calculated for the Executive Chairman. Mr. Lichtenstein’s value of equity ownership as a director.of December 31, 2018 was $24,589,685.
2018 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE2018 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned or paid to each non-employee Director who served on the Board in 2018. Employee Directors are not compensated for services as a Director.The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned or paid to each non-employee Director who served on the Board in 2018. Employee Directors are not compensated for services as a Director.
Name
Fees Earned
or Paid
($)(1)
Stock Awards
($)(2)(3)
Option
Awards
($)(2)(3)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
Fees Earned
or Paid
($)(1)
Stock Awards
($)(2)(3)
Option
Awards
($)(2)(3)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
Kevin P. Chilton$17,472
$73,856
$—
$—
$91,328
Thomas A. Corcoran$90,440
$135,185
$—
$3,000
$228,625
89,924
144,928
—
2,000
236,852
James R. Henderson120,946
150,427
—
—
271,373
117,432
158,695
—
—
276,127
Warren G. Lichtenstein140,951
280,422
—
—
421,373
Lance W. Lord51,207
111,148
—
—
162,355
87,425
121,772
—
—
209,197
Merrill A. McPeak93,447
136,688
—
—
230,135
94,913
147,436
—
—
242,349
James H. Perry114,452
147,191
—
—
261,643
107,427
167,062
—
—
274,489
Martin Turchin99,439
139,674
—
—
239,113
102,438
151,198
—
—
253,636

21



(1)The amounts reported in this column for each non-employee Director reflect the dollar amount of the Board and Committee fees paid in fiscal 2015.2018. Non-employee Directors have a choice to receive all or a portion of their directorDirector fees in fully vested Common Stock of the Company, in which the number of shares is determined by the closing price of the Common Stock as of the applicable pay date. If a Director elects to receive fees in Common Stock, an additional grant of restricted shares of Common Stock are given in an amount equal in value to 50% of the amount of fees paid in fully vested Common Stock. This additional grant is reported in the “Stock Awards” column. Non-employee Directors and the Executive Chairman also have a choice to defer all or a portion of fully vested and restricted shares of Common Stock. Distribution of deferred stock can be made in a single payment or at least two but no more than 10 annual installments, with a choice to begin distribution 30 days following retirement from the Board, on a date specified by the participant, or upon attainment of an age specified by the participating director.Director. The following table shows directorDirector fees that were paid in fully vested Common Stock in fiscal 2015.2018.
Pay Date 
  
Thomas A.
Corcoran
James R.
Henderson
Warren G.
Lichtenstein
Lance W. Lord
Merrill A.
McPeak
James H.
Perry
Martin
Turchin
01/15/2015Stock Awards (#)800
800
1,601
—
800
800
800
01/15/2015Grant Date Fair Value $13,736
$13,736
$27,489
$—
$13,736
$13,736
$13,736
04/15/2015Stock Awards (#)2,358
3,819
2,801
568
2,502
3,508
2,789
04/15/2015Grant Date Fair Value $49,235
$79,741
$58,485
$11,860
$52,242
$73,247
$58,234
07/15/2015Stock Awards (#)571
571
1,143
285
571
571
571
07/15/2015Grant Date Fair Value $13,733
$13,733
$27,489
$6,854
$13,733
$13,733
$13,733
10/15/2015Stock Awards (#)822
822
1,645
411
822
822
822
10/15/2015Grant Date Fair Value $13,736
$13,736
$27,488
$6,868
$13,736
$13,736
$13,736
TotalStock Awards (#)4,551
6,012
7,190
1,264
4,695
5,701
4,982
TotalGrant Date Fair Value$90,440
$120,946
$140,951
$25,582
$93,447
$114,452
$99,439
Name
Grant
Date
Fully Vested Stock
Awards
(#)
Grant Date
Fair Value
($)
Kevin P. Chilton11/15/2018486
$17,472
 Total486
17,472
Thomas A. Corcoran02/15/2018634
17,492

05/15/20181,345
37,485
 08/15/2018483
17,475

11/15/2018486
17,472
 Total2,948
89,924
James R. Henderson02/15/2018634
17,492
 05/15/20182,332
64,993

08/15/2018483
17,475
 11/15/2018486
17,472
 Total3,935
117,432
Lance W. Lord02/15/2018317
8,746
 05/15/2018627
17,474
 08/15/2018241
8,719
 11/15/2018243
8,736
 Total1,428
43,675
Merrill A. McPeak02/15/2018634
17,492
 05/15/20181,524
42,474
 08/15/2018483
17,475
 11/15/2018486
17,472
 Total3,127
94,913
James H. Perry02/15/2018634
17,492
 05/15/20181,973
54,988
 08/15/2018483
17,475
 11/15/2018486
17,472
 Total3,576
107,427
Martin Turchin02/15/2018634
17,492
 05/15/20181,794
49,999
 08/15/2018483
17,475
 11/15/2018486
17,472
 Total3,397
102,438








22



(2)
The amounts reported in these columns for each non-employee Director reflect the grant date fair value of stock awards in fiscal 2015.2018. A description of these awards can be found under the section entitled Long-Term Incentives (Equity-Based Compensation)Equity Incentive Awards on page 32.36. A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating these values may be found in Note 10(d)9(d) in the audited financial statements in the Company’s 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2015.Report. The following table shows each grant of restricted shares of Common Stock granted during fiscal 20152018 to each non-employee Director who served as a Director in fiscal 2015,2018, and the aggregate grant date fair value for each award.

18


Name
Grant        
Date
    Stock Awards    
(#)
Grant Date    
Fair Value
($)
Grant        
Date
    Stock Awards    
(#)
Grant Date    
Fair Value
($)
 
Kevin P. Chilton10/30/2018500
(A) 
$15,130
 
10/30/20181,652
(C) 
49,990
 
11/15/2018243
(B) 
8,736
 
Total2,395
 73,856
 
Thomas A. Corcoran01/15/2015400
(A) 
$6,868
02/15/2018317
(B) 
8,746
 
03/31/20153,880
(B) 
89,977
05/15/20183,588
(C) 
99,998
 
04/15/20151,179
(A) 
24,618
05/15/2018672
(B) 
18,729
 
07/15/2015285
(A) 
6,854
08/15/2018241
(B) 
8,719
 
10/15/2015411
(A) 
6,868
11/15/2018243
(B) 
8,736
 
Total6,155
 135,185
Total5,061
 144,928
 
James R. Henderson01/15/2015400
(A) 
6,868
02/15/2018317
(B) 
8,746
 
03/31/20153,880
(B) 
89,977
04/15/20151,909
(A) 
39,860
07/15/2015285
(A) 
6,854
10/15/2015411
(A) 
6,868
Total6,885
 150,427
Warren G. Lichtenstein01/15/2015800
(A) 
13,736
03/31/20159055
(B) 
209,985
05/15/20183,588
(C) 
99,998
 
04/15/20151,400
(A) 
29,232
05/15/20181,166
(B) 
32,496
 
07/15/2015571
(A) 
13,733
08/15/2018241
(B) 
8,719
 
10/15/2015822
(A) 
13,736
11/15/2018243
(B) 
8,736
 
Total12,648
 280,422
Total5,555
 158,695
 
Lance W. Lord02/01/2015500
(C) 
8,400
02/15/2018158
(B) 
4,359
 
03/31/20153,880
(B) 
89,977
05/15/20183,588
(C) 
99,998
 
04/15/2015284
(A) 
5,930
05/15/2018313
(B) 
8,723
 
07/15/2015142
(A) 
3,415
08/15/2018120
(B) 
4,342
 
10/15/2015205
(A) 
3,426
11/15/2018121
(B) 
4,350
 
Total5,011
 111,148
Total4,300
 121,772
 
Merrill A. McPeak01/15/2015400
(A) 
6,868
02/15/2018317
(B) 
8,746
 
03/31/20153,880
(B) 
89,977
05/15/20183,588
(C) 
99,998
 
04/15/20151,251
(A) 
26,121
05/15/2018762
(B) 
21,237
 
07/15/2015285
(A) 
6,854
08/15/2018241
(B) 
8,719
 
10/15/2015411
(A) 
6,868
11/15/2018243
(B) 
8,736
 
Total6,227
 136,688
Total5,151
 147,436
 
James H. Perry01/15/2015400
(A) 
6,868
02/15/2018317
(B) 
8,746
 
03/31/20153,880
(B) 
89,977
05/15/20183,588
(C) 
113,381
(D) 
04/15/20151,754
(A) 
36,624
05/15/2018986
(B) 
27,480
 
07/15/2015285
(A) 
6,854
08/15/2018241
(B) 
8,719
 
10/15/2015411
(A) 
6,868
11/15/2018243
(B) 
8,736
 
Total6,730
 147,191
Total5,375
 167,062
 
Martin Turchin01/15/2015400
(A) 
6,868
02/15/2018317
(B) 
8,746
 
03/31/20153,880
(B) 
89,977
05/15/20183,588
(C) 
99,998
 
04/15/20151,394
(A) 
29,107
05/15/2018897
(B) 
24,999
 
07/15/2015285
(A) 
6,854
08/15/2018241
(B) 
8,719
 
10/15/2015411
(A) 
6,868
11/15/2018243
(B) 
8,736
 
Total6,370
 139,674
Total5,286
 151,198
 
(A)This award vests three years from the grant date on October 30, 2021.
(B)These shares vest on the earlier of the Director’s retirement from the Board or the one year anniversaryanniversaries of the grant date.
(B)(C)These equity awards vest in 50% increments on the six-month and twelve-month anniversary of the grant date.
(C)(D)This award vests three years from theThe grant date on 02/01/fair value presented here includes the incremental fair value of a modification to accelerate the vesting of 50% of the award to November 16, 2018. The original vesting date was May 15, 2019.

1923



(3)The following table shows the amount of unvested stock awards and outstanding and unexercised SARs and option awards and unvested stock awards as of November 30, 2015December 31, 2018, for each non-employee Director who served as a Director in fiscal 2015.2018 and the Executive Chairman.
NameUnvested Stock AwardsOutstanding and Unexercised Option Awards
Outstanding and
Unexercised SARs
Unvested Stock 
Awards
Outstanding and
Unexercised SARs and Stock Options
Kevin P. Chilton2,395
—
Thomas A. Corcoran4,215
—
84,907
3,267
7,355
James R. Henderson4,945
—
113,118
3,761
—
Warren G. Lichtenstein8,121
43,546
101,869
60,000
272,482
Lance W. Lord3,071
—
—
2,506
—
Merrill A. McPeak4,787
—
7,355
3,357
7,355
James H. Perry4,790
—
99,907
—
—
Martin Turchin4,430
—
99,907
3,492
46,201

 

24


20


Security Ownership of Officers and Directors
The following table lists share ownership of Common Stock by the Company’s current Directors, nominees and the named executive officers, as well as the number of shares beneficially owned by all of the current Directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, share ownership is direct. Amounts owned reflect ownership as of March 1, 2016.VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS
Beneficial Owner
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial  Ownership(1)(2)
Percent of Class
Directors   
Thomas A. Corcoran(3)
85,967
 *
James R. Henderson(4)
130,572
 *
Warren G. Lichtenstein(5)
183,041
 *
Lance W. Lord(6)
6,960
 *
Merrill A. McPeak(7)
31,817
 *
James H. Perry129,990
 *
Martin Turchin (8)
118,909
 *
Executive Officers   
Eileen P. Drake210,218
 *
Kathleen E. Redd (9)
317,493
 *
Christopher C. Cambria82,829
 *
John D. Schumacher(10)
57,286
 *
Mark A. Tucker77,064
 *
Former Executive Officers   
Scott J. Seymour(11)
842,601
 1.3%
All Current Directors and Executive Officers as a group (12 persons)1,432,146
 2.2%
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table presents beneficial owners of more than 5% of the 78,667,616 shares of the Common Stock outstanding as of March 13, 2019, based on reports on Schedule 13D and Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on or prior to March 13, 2019.
Beneficial Owner
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
Percent
of Class
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055
12,408,504
(1) 
15.8%
GAMCO Investors, Inc.
One Corporate Center, Rye, NY 10580
8,035,196
(2) 
10.2%
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355
8,031,900
(3) 
10.2%
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202
7,194,037
(4) 
9.1%
Steel Partners Holdings L.P.
590 Madison Avenue, 32nd Floor, New York, NY 10022
4,180,997
(5) 
5.3%
*(1)BlackRock, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 12,266,517 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to the 12,408,504 shares. The foregoing information is according to Amendment No. 9 to a Schedule 13G dated January 24, 2019, and filed with the SEC on January 24, 2019.
(2)Includes shares beneficially owned by Mario J. Gabelli and various affiliated entities, including Gabelli Funds, LLC, GAMCO Asset Management Inc., Teton Advisors, Inc., Gabelli Securities, Inc., GGCP, Inc., GAMCO Investors, Inc. and Associated Capital Group, Inc. Gabelli Funds, LLC reported sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 2,844,349 shares. GAMCO Asset Management Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 3,758,632 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 4,053,332 shares. Gabelli & Company Investment Advisors, Inc. reported sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,000 shares. Teton Advisors, Inc. reported sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,128,515 shares. GGCP, Inc. reported sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 8,000 shares. GAMCO Investors, Inc. and Associated Capital Group, Inc. each reported sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 0 shares. All of the foregoing information is according to Amendment No. 54 to a Schedule 13D dated October 30, 2018, and filed with the SEC on November 1, 2018 and is inclusive of an aggregate amount of 163,436 shares issuable upon the conversion of the Company’s 2.25% Senior Convertible Notes held by the reporting entities.
(3)The Vanguard Group reported sole voting power with respect to 149,208 shares, shared voting power with respect to 9,787 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 7,879,140 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 152,760. The foregoing information is according to Amendment No. 1 to a Schedule 13G dated February 11, 2019, and filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019.
(4)T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 1,385,347 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to the 7,194,037 shares. The foregoing information is according to a Schedule 13G dated February 14, 2019, and filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019.
(5)Consists of shares owned directly by Steel Excel. SPH Group Holdings LLC (“SPHG Holdings”) owns 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Steel Excel. SPLP owns 99% of the membership interests of SPH Group LLC (“SPHG”). SPHG is the sole member of SPHG Holdings. Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc. (“Steel Partners GP”) is the general partner of SPLP, the managing member of SPHG and the manager of SPHG Holdings. By virtue of these relationships, each of SPLP, SPHG and Steel Holdings GP may be deemed to beneficially own the shares owned directly by Steel Excel. Each of the foregoing may be deemed to have shared voting and dispositive power with respect to such shares. All of the foregoing information is according to Amendment No. 24 to a Schedule 13D dated December 26, 2017, and filed with the SEC on December 26, 2017.



25



Security Ownership of Officers and Directors
The following table lists share ownership of Common Stock by the Company’s current Directors, nominees and executive officers, as well as the number of shares beneficially owned by all of the current Directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, share ownership is direct. Amounts owned reflect ownership as of March 13, 2019.
Beneficial Owner
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial  Ownership(1)(2)
Percent of Class
Non-Employee Directors and the Executive Chairman   
Kevin P. Chilton(3)
3,533
 *
Thomas A. Corcoran(4)
112,360
 *
James R. Henderson(5)
113,513
 *
Warren G. Lichtenstein(6)
848,329
 1.1%
Lance W. Lord(7)
27,879
 *
Merrill A. McPeak(8)
63,912
 *
Martin Turchin(9)
118,029
 *
Executive Officers   
Eileen P. Drake(10)
569,676
 *
Mark A. Tucker174,400
 *
Paul R. Lundstrom143,812
 *
John D. Schumacher(11)
117,238
 *
Arjun L. Kampani99,271
 *
All Current Directors and Executive Officers as a group (12 persons)2,391,952
 3.0%
* Less than 1.0%
(1)Includes restricted shares granted under the 1999 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan, the 2009 Incentive Plan, the 2018 Incentive Plan and shares owned outright. The number of shares beneficially owned by a current officer of the Company includes shares credited in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan as of March 1, 2016.
(2)Includes shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options that may be exercised within 60 days after March 1, 201613, 2019, as follows: Mr. Lichtenstein — 43,546;243,546; Ms. ReddDrake — 129,366;17,848; Mr. SeymourTucker — 182,626;12,594; Mr. Schumacher — 11,610 , and all current directorsDirectors and executive officers as a group — 172,912285,598 shares.
(3)These shares are held in the name of the Rabbi Trust.
(4)Includes 77,188108,441 shares held in the Thomas A. Corcoran TTEE U/A DTD 07/16/2001.
(4)(5)Includes 29,23165,406 shares held in the name of the Rabbi Trust.
(5)(6)Includes 68,753515,089 shares held in the name of the Rabbi Trust and 5,00060,546 shares held through Steel Partners, Ltd. (“SPL”). Mr. Lichtenstein, as the Chief Executive OfficerCEO and sole director of SPL, may be deemed to beneficially own the shares of common stockCommon Stock owned directly by SPL. Mr. Lichtenstein disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares owned by SPL except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
(6)Includes 6,960 shares held in the name of the Rabbi Trust.
(7)Includes 31,817These shares are held in the name of the Rabbi Trust.
(8)These shares are held in the name of the Rabbi Trust.
(9)Includes 24,91519,879 shares held in the name of the Rabbi Trust, 7,500 shares held in the name of Martin Turchin IRA Rollover, 3,000 shares held in the name of Peter Turchin Trust, 1,000 shares held in the name of Coulter Turchin Trust and 1,000 shares held in the name of Tyler Turchin Trust.
(9)(10)Includes 47,553113,534 shares held throughin the Paul Kingsley Redd and Kathleen Ellen Redd RevocableEPD 2018 Trust and 625dated August 7, 2018.
(11)The number of shares heldbeneficially owned includes shares credited in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan Trust.as of March 13, 2019.

26



(10)
Includes 2,332 shares held in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan Trust.Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s Directors and certain officers and persons who own more than 10% of the outstanding Common Stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the SEC and the NYSE. The SEC also requires such persons to furnish the Company with copies of the Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms that the Company has received, the Company believes that all of its Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners complied with all filing requirements applicable to them with respect to transactions during 2018.
(11)Includes 155,907 shares held in the Scott J. Seymour and Kathleen T. Goette Seymour Family Trust and 90,462 shares held in the Scott J. Seymour Equity Trust dated December 23, 2012.

21



Code of Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Company has adopted a code of ethics known as the Aerojet Rocketdyne Code of Conduct Manual that applies to the Company’s employees including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer. Amendments to the Aerojet Rocketdyne Code of Conduct Manual and any grant of a waiver from the provision of the Aerojet Rocketdyne Code of Conduct Manual requiring disclosure under applicable SEC rules will be disclosed on the Company’s website at www.AerojetRocketdyne.com. Copies of the Aerojet Rocketdyne Code of Conduct Manual and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines are also available on the Company’s website at www.AerojetRocketdyne.com/corporate-governance (copies are available in print to any stockholder or other interested person who requests them by writingsends a written request to Secretary, Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., P.O. Box 537012, Sacramento,222 N. Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 500, El Segundo, California 95853-7012)90245).
Related Person Transaction Policy
The Company has a written policy for the review of transactions in which the Company is a participant, the amount exceeds the lesser of $120,000, or 1% of the average ofand in which the Company’s total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which5% or more stockholders, or any of the Company’s Directors or executive officers, or their immediate family members, had a direct or indirect material interest (a “Related Party Transaction”). AnyPursuant to such policy, any Related Party Transaction was tomust be forin the benefitbest interest of the Company and its stockholders and upon terms no less favorable to the Company than if thesuch Related Party Transaction was towith an unrelatedunaffiliated third party. The Company’s Audit Committee is responsible for approving any such transactionsRelated Party Transactions and the Company’s CEOGeneral Counsel and Corporate Secretary is responsible for maintaining a list of all existing Related Party Transactions.
The chairmanWarren G. Lichtenstein, the Executive Chairman of the Company’s boardCompany is also the Executive Chairman of directors is executive chairmanSPLP and the CEO of Steel Partners Holdings L.P.Ltd. (“Steel Holdings”). Steel Holdings owns 100% of SP Corporate Services LLC ("SP Corporate"SPL”). The Company received services of $1.1$0.6 million in fiscal 2015both 2018 and 2017 from SP CorporateSPLP and SPL, which primarily forincluded administrative services and the use of an aircraft for business travel. As of November 30, 2015,December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had a payableliabilities due to SP Corporatesuch entities of $0.5 million.$0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
Lucas-Milhaupt, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of SPLP, sold $0.3 million and $0.2 million in raw materials to the Company for the manufacture of its products in 2018 and 2017, respectively.
GAMCO Investors, Inc. (“GAMCO”) owned 10% and 12% of the Company’s Common Stock at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company received services of $1.7 million and $1.1 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively from GAMCO for investment management fees of the Company’s defined benefit pension plan assets.
Martin Turchin, a member of the Board, is also a non-executive Vice Chairman of CBRE. The Company received services of $0.4 million from CBRE for lease commissions in 2018.
BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) owned 16% and 15% of the Company’s Common Stock at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company invests in money market funds managed by BlackRock.
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”) owned 10% of the Company’s Common Stock at December 31, 2018 and 2017. Certain of the investment alternatives offered through the Company’s 401(k) savings plan include funds managed by Vanguard.


27


22


REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities for general oversight of (i) the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial statements; (ii) the performance of the Company’s financial reporting process,processes. The Audit Committee Charter describes in greater detail the full responsibilities of the Audit Committee. During each year, the Audit Committee reviews the Company's consolidated financial statements, internal control system;over financial reporting, audit matters and reports from management. In connection with these reviews, the Audit Committee meets with management and the independent public accountants (PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”)) at least once each quarter. The Audit Committee schedules its meetings with a view to ensuring that it devotes appropriate attention to all of its tasks. These meetings include, whenever appropriate, executive sessions in which the Audit Committee meets separately with the independent public accountants, internal auditors, management personnel and legal counsel.
As part of its review of audit function; (iii)matters, the Company’s complianceAudit Committee supervises the relationship between the Company and its independent public accountants, including: having direct responsibility for their appointment, compensation and retention; reviewing the nature and type of their services; approving their audit and non-audit services; reviewing the plan for and results of the annual integrated audit and quarterly reviews of the Company's consolidated financial statements; and confirming their independence. The Audit Committee has evaluated PwC's qualifications, performance and independence, including that of the lead audit partner. The Audit Committee and senior financial management determine the selection of the lead audit partner, working with legalPwC. As part of the engagement process, the Audit Committee considers whether to rotate the independent public accountants. Although the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint the independent public accountants, the Audit Committee will continue its longstanding practice of recommending that the Board ask the stockholders to ratify the appointment of the independent public accountants at the Annual Meeting.
In addition, the Audit Committee reviews key initiatives and regulatory requirements, includingprograms aimed at maintaining the effectiveness of the corporate EthicsCompany's internal control over financial reporting. Together with senior members of the Company's management team, the Audit Committee reviews the plans of the internal auditors, the results of internal audit examinations and Compliance Programevaluations by management and the Company's independent public accountants of the Company's internal control over financial reporting and the quality of the Company's financial reporting. As part of this process, the Audit Committee monitors the scope and adequacy of the Company's internal auditing program, including reviewing internal audit department staffing levels and steps taken to maintain the effectiveness of internal procedures and controls.
In performing all areas for which management hasof these functions, the primary responsibility; and (iv) the independent auditor’s performance, qualifications and independence.Audit Committee acts in an oversight capacity. The Audit Committee managesreviews and discusses the Company’s relationshipquarterly unaudited and annual audited consolidated financial statements with management, the internal auditors and the independent public accountants prior to their issuance. In its independent auditors, who report directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from outside legal, accounting or other advisors asoversight role, the Audit Committee deems necessary to carry out its duties, with funding fromrelies on the Company for such advicework and assistance. Managementassurances of the Company's management, which is primarily responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, preparing the Company’s system of internal controls and preparingconsolidated financial statements in accordanceand other reports and maintaining policies relating to legal and regulatory compliance, ethics and conflicts of interest. PwC is responsible for performing an independent audit of the annual consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those consolidated financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, (“GAAP”).as well as expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
The Audit Committee has reviewed with the independent public accountants the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, “Communications with Audit Committees,” including a discussion with management and the independent public accountants about the quality (and not merely the acceptability) of the Company's accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant estimates, judgments and the transparency of disclosures in the Company's consolidated financial statements. In fulfilling its responsibilities,addition, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements in the Annual ReportPwC matters related to its independence, including a discussionreview of the reasonableness of significant judgmentsaudit and non-audit fees and the clarity ofwritten disclosures in the financial statements.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the Company’s financial statements with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), the Company’s independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with GAAP, and discussed such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under generally accepted auditing standards. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards Vol. 1, AU Section 380), as adopted by the Public Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.letters from PwC also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding PwC’s communicationsthe independent public accountant's communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with PwC their independence from management and the Company.
independence. The Audit Committee also reviewed with managementconcluded that PwC is independent from the Company and the independent auditors the preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures contained in the Company’s earnings announcements and quarterly reports.
The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee met with the internal and independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee also received PwC’s report on the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. The Company outlined these reports in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2015.management.
The Audit Committee met sevensix times during fiscal 2015.2018.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to in the foregoing paragraphs, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board (and the Board approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s 2018

28



Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2015 for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee appointed PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2015.2019.
Submitted by the Audit Committee,
James H. Perry, Chairman
James R. Henderson, Chairman
Lance W. Lord
Martin Turchin
JanuaryFebruary 19, 20162019



2329



ORGANIZATION & COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Organization & Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussion, the Organization & Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and the Company’s 20152018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report. The Board has approved that recommendation.
The Organization & Compensation Committee met eightnine times during fiscal 2015.2018.
Submitted by the Organization & Compensation Committee,
Merrill A. McPeak, Chairman
Thomas A. Corcoran
Warren G. Lichtenstein
James H. PerryLance W. Lord
January 19, 2016February 28, 2019


30



PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE AEROJET ROCKETDYNE’S EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANTCOMPENSATION
As we do each year, pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, which was added under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, the Company is providing its stockholders the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory, non-binding basis, the compensation of the NEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules. Unless the Company modifies its policy on the frequency of advisory votes to approve executive compensation, it is expected that the next such vote will occur at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Company’s executive compensation program is designed to support our business goals and promote both short-term and long-term growth and directly link pay to performance. The compensation program for executive officers has historically consisted of the following principal elements: short-term compensation, including base salaries and annual cash incentive awards; long-term equity incentive awards, including restricted stock, stock options and cash-settled SARs; and in-service and post-retirement/employment benefits.
We are asking stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of the executive officers named in the “Summary Compensation Table” included in this Proxy Statement (referred to as the “named executive officers” or “NEOs”). This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the NEOs’ compensation. Accordingly, we will ask stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the NEOs, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 2018 Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.”
The following informationsay-on-pay vote is givenadvisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Organization & Compensation Committee or our Board. The Board and the Organization & Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the NEO compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns and the Organization & Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
The affirmative vote of December 31, 2015.
the holders of at least a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote is necessary to approve this proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. While this vote is required by law, it will neither be binding on the Company or the Board, nor will it create or imply any change in the fiduciary duties of, or impose any additional fiduciary duty on, the Company or the Board.
NameTitleOther Business ExperienceAge
Eileen P. DrakeChief Executive Officer and PresidentThe Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the advisory approval of the Company (since June 2015)Chief Operating Officer, March 2015 — June 2015; President of Pratt & Whitney AeroPower’s auxiliary power unit and small turbojet propulsion business, UTC 2012 — 2015; Vice President of Operations, UTC 2009 — 2012; Vice President of Quality, Environmental Health & Safety, and Achieving Competitive Excellence, UTC 2003 — 2009; Product Line Manager and Plant Manager, Ford Motor Company 1996 — 2003; United States Army 1989 — 1996.49
Mark A. TuckerChief Operating Officer of the Company (since June 2015)Senior Vice President, Enterprise Operations and Engineering, Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. October 2013 — June 2015; Vice President Special Programs, Aerospace Systems Sector, Northrop Grumman 1983 — 2013.57
Kathleen E. ReddVice President, Chief Financial Officer (since January 2009), and Assistant Secretary of the Company (since March 2012)Secretary, February 2009 — March 2012; Vice President, Controller and Acting Chief Financial Officer September 2008 — January 2009; Vice President, Finance 2006 — 2008; Assistant Corporate Controller, 2002 — 2006; Acting Vice President Controller GDX Automotive, 2003 — 2004 (concurrent with Assistant Corporate Controller position during divestiture activities); Vice President, Finance, for Grass Valley Group, 2001 — 2002; Vice President, Finance for JOMED, Inc., 2000 — 2001; Controller for EndoSonics Corporation, 1996 — 2000.54

24


NameTitleOther Business ExperienceAge
Christopher C. CambriaVice President, General Counsel (since September 2011), and Secretary of the Company (since March 2012)Self employed legal consultant 2010 — 2011. Senior Vice President and Senior Counsel, Mergers and Acquisitions for L-3 Communications Holdings 2006 — 2009; Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel 2001 — 2006; and Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary 1997 — 2001; Associate with Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson 1994 — 1997.57
John D. SchumacherVice President, Washington Operations of the Company (since April 2013).President, Astrium Americas and Vice President, Space, EADS North America April 2011 — April 2013; Vice President, Washington Operations, Aerojet Rocketdyne May 2006 — April 2011; Director, Whitney, Bradley & Brown Consulting September 2005 — May 2006; Chief of Staff, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) May 2003 — September 2005; Associate Administrator for External Relations, NASA 1994 — 2003; Deputy Associate Administrator, NASA 1990 — 1994.61Rocketdyne’s executive compensation.
The Company’s executive officers generally hold terms of office of one year and/or until their successors are elected and serve at the discretion of the Board.


2531



EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
2018 Named Executive Officers
Eileen P. DrakeChief Executive Officer and President
Mark A. TuckerChief Operating Officer
Paul R. LundstromVice President, Chief Financial Officer
John D. SchumacherSenior Vice President, Washington Operations
Arjun L. KampaniVice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Executive Summary
Our compensation program is designed to support our business goals and promote both short-short-term and long-term growth using a pay-for-performance model for alignment of the financial interests of our named executive officersteam with the interests of our stockholders.
The overall objectives of our compensation program are as follows:
Competitive Compensation - attract and retain high caliber executives and key personnel by providing compensation that is competitive with compensation for executive officers providing comparable services to similarly-situated companies, taking into account our size and complexity and the markets we serve
Retention Incentives - retain high caliber executives by providing incentives for long-term continued employment with the Company
Performance Incentives - align the compensation structure of executives with goals of the Company by basing a meaningful portion of total compensation on achievement of performance goals
Stakeholder Incentives - promote an ownership interest that aligns management and stockholders. In this regard, the Organization & Compensation Committee approved robust share ownership guidelines that apply to our NEOs, where over a period of time, each NEO is expected to own shares of our Common Stock equal in total market value to a designated multiple of such NEO’s annual salary
In this section of the Proxy Statement, we explain how our compensation program is designed and operates with respect to our named executive officers,NEOs, including how their pay is reflected in the Company’s performance on relevant financial measures. In addition, we describe the key changes made toThe following NEOs are included in this Proxy Statement:
Ms. Drake is included as the Company’s executive compensation program since the date of our last annual proxy statement. The 2015 executive compensation program covered our current and former Principal Executive Officer namely(“PEO”).
Mr. Lundstrom is included as the Company’s current and former President and CEO; our Principal Financial Officer namely(“PFO”).
Messrs. Tucker, Schumacher and Kampani are included as the Vice President, CFO and Assistant Secretary; and our three other namedmost highly compensated executive officers who were officers as ofother than the end of fiscal 2015. The 2015 executive compensation program also covered other key employees of the Company.PEO and PFO.
We have designed our executive compensation program, underUnder the direction of the Organization & Compensation Committee of our Board, we have designed our executive compensation program pertaining to the NEOs to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers and to directly link pay to performance. OurIn 2018 our strategic goals includecontinued to be focused on improving our financial performance. Accordingly, as discussedperformance, which resulted in more detail below, the Organization & Compensation Committee setmaintaining the same performance measures within our named executive officers’ 2015 annual incentive performance targets against benchmarks related to contract profit, operating cash flow, contract awards, and certain other goals that include individual performance and accomplishments of each named executive officer with this final component only being payable toplan as in the extent that all three aforementioned financial metrics are met at or aboveprevious year. Specifically, the threshold level for each metric. The Organization & Compensation Committee also granted performance-based restricted stock with vesting subject to achievement of performance targets based onused the following five metrics: revenue;measures for our NEOs within our 2018 annual incentive plan:
Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and pension expense (“EBITDAP”);
Cash flow from operations;

32



Aerojet Rocketdyne bookings; and
Certain other goals that include individual performance and accomplishments of each NEO.
The Organization & Compensation Committee also granted NEOs 2018 equity, in the same form as was granted in 2017, of SARs (25% of award) and performance-based restricted stock (75% of award). The performance-based restricted stock vesting is subject to achievement of performance targets based on the following three metrics for the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2020: revenue; adjusted EBITDAP; and return on invested capital (“ROIC”);.
On February 19, 2019, we reported our financial results for 2018 which included the following highlights (non-GAAP financial measures are identified with asterisks):
Net sales for 2018 totaled $1,895.9 million compared with $1,877.2 million for 2017.
Net income for 2018 was $137.3 million, or $1.75 diluted earnings per share ("EPS"), compared with net loss of $(9.2) million, or $(0.13) diluted EPS for 2017.
Adjusted Net Income* for 2018 was $151.5 million, or $1.93 Adjusted EPS*, compared with $76.0 million, or $1.02 Adjusted EPS* for 2017.
Adjusted EBITDAP* for 2018 was $304.9 million, compared with $222.9 million for 2017.
Cash provided by operating activities in 2018 totaled $252.7 million compared with $212.8 million in 2017.
Free cash flow* in 2018 totaled $209.5 million compared with $183.4 million in 2017.
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted the new revenue recognition guidance. Consistent with the standard, net assets increased by $37.6 million and $578.0 million of net sales were recognized in the cumulative Competitive Improvement Plan (“CIP”) Phase I investment; and cumulative CIP Phase I savings. The CIP iseffect at January 1, 2018, with a long-term strategic initiatives aimed at reducing costs in order for the Companycorresponding reduction to continue to compete successfully.backlog.
The overall objectives
Total backlog as of December 31, 2018, was $4.1 billion compared with $4.6 billion as of December 31, 2017.
* These are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information, see Appendix A - Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
A full discussion of our executive compensation program are as follows:
Performance Incentives — align the compensation structure of executives with the goals of the Company by basing a meaningful portion of total compensation on achievement of performance goals;
Competitive Compensation — attract and retain high caliber executives and key personnel by providing compensation that is competitive with compensation for executive officers providing comparable services to similarly-situated companies, taking into account our size and complexity and the markets we serve;
Retention Incentives — retain high caliber executives by providing incentives for long-term continued employment with the Company or incentives for certain critical talent to achieve key short-term or mid-term strategic initiatives; and
Stakeholder Incentives — promote an ownership interest that aligns management and stockholders. In this regard, the Organization & Compensation Committee approved robust share ownership guidelines that apply to our named executive officers, where over a period of time, each named executive officer is expected to own shares of our Common Stock equal in total market value to a designated multiple of such named executive officer’s annual salary.
The Organization & Compensation Committee changed the metric utilized for fiscal 2015 performance-based restricted stock grants for all named executive officers. Specifically, given the complexity of multiple strategic initiatives and the importance to shareholders of remaining competitivedescribed in the industry, the Organization & Compensation committee diversified the metric from a single cumulative Free Cash Flow metric for the prior fiscal 2014 grants to five metrics (revenue, EBITDAP, ROIC, cumulative CIP investments, and cumulative CIP savings) in order to enhance performance.


26


Say-on-Pay
In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Company began providing our stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote regarding the compensation of our named executive officers. At the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. held on March 31, 2015, 95.2% of the votes cast (excluding those who abstained or were broker non-votes) were in favor of the Company’s executive compensation program. After considering the outcomeremainder of this advisory vote and other relevant facts and circumstances relating to the Company’s executive pay, the Organization & Compensation Committee determined that no significant changes to our compensation policies were necessary.
Administration of the Executive Compensation Program
The Organization & Compensation Committee determines most matters of executive compensation and benefits, although the committee has delegated to the CEO and President the final authority to establish base salaries of the named executive officers of the Company other than her/himself. Our former President and CEO; our Vice President, CFO and Assistant Secretary; and our former Vice President, Human Resources provided input to the Organization & Compensation Committee with respect to the 2015 compensation program. The Organization & Compensation Committee advises and makes compensation recommendations to the independent members of the Board with respect to compensation for the CEO and President.
In assessing competitive overall compensation, the Organization & Compensation Committee engages, from time to time, an independent outside consulting firm to aid in the review and evaluation of the total compensation provided to the named executive officers. Since fiscal 2010, the Company has retained Hay Group to review the design of the Company’s annual and long-term incentive programs and to assist in developing an executive compensation structure that was based on the internal hierarchy of jobs and aligned with external market practices. In performing its duties, Hay Group worked with senior management and the Chairman of the Organization & Compensation Committee to understand the Company’s business strategy, the competitive market for talent, and the accountabilities of the executives and perceptions of the Company’s current compensation programs. Hay Group was also instructed to develop an executive compensation comparator group of publicly traded companies in the aerospace and defense industry. Based on the information presented by Hay Group and input from our Vice President, CFO and Assistant Secretary, and our former Vice President, Human Resources, the Organization & Compensation Committee and the former President and CEO exercised its business judgment as to setting base salaries and incentive compensation levels and correlating performance levels for incentive-based compensation for the named executive officers.
Independent Executive Compensation Consultant’s Role
Both management and the Organization & Compensation Committee retain Hay Group to provide objective analysis, advice and information to each of them, including competitive market data and compensation recommendations related to the CEO and President and other senior executives. Hay Group served as the independent executive compensation consultant to management and the Organization & Compensation Committee during fiscal 2015. The executive compensation consultant reports to the former Vice President or Senior Director of Human Resources and the Chairman of the Organization & Compensation Committee, and has direct access to the other members of the Organization & Compensation Committee as well as senior management. The total fees for the services provided by Hay Group to the Company in fiscal 2015 were $334,544.
In addition to the compensation services provided by Hay Group to management and the Organization & Compensation Committee related to executive compensation, Hay Group provided certain services to the Company at the request of management consisting of organization structure advice. The fees for the other services provided by Hay Group in fiscal 2015 were $31,909 which is included in the $334,545 total disclosed in the previous paragraph. The Organization & Compensation Committee believes that, given the nature and scope of these additional services, they did not raise a conflict of interest and did not impair Hay Group’s ability to provide independent advice to the Organization & Compensation Committee concerning executive compensation matters.
In making the overall determination of the independence of Hay Group and Hay Group’s lead advisor to the Organization & Compensation Committee, the Organization & Compensation Committee considered, among other things, the factors on independence adopted in final SEC rules and approved in NYSE listing standards.

27


The decisions made by the Organization & Compensation Committee are the responsibility of the Organization & Compensation Committee and may reflect factors and considerations other than the information and recommendations provided by Hay Group.
Consideration of Competitive Market Data Regarding Executive Compensation
The Organization & Compensation Committee and the former President and CEO used the results of the compensation study completed by Hay Group in fiscal 2014 to determine pay for fiscal 2015. The Organization & Compensation Committee and the former President and CEO set base salaries, target annual cash incentive levels and target annual long-term incentive award values for the named executive officers generally at or below the 50th percentile of competitive market levels for comparable aerospace and defense companies. This approach was the starting point of the analysis, then adjustments were made to some executives’ target compensation to reflect other factors such as the executives’ experience, breadth of responsibilities, tenure in the position, overall individual performance, and the Company’s performance overall.
The study conducted by Hay Group in fiscal 2014 compared total executive compensation against similarly sized U.S. companies in the aerospace and defense industry and in the broader general industry, using data from Hay Group’s Executive Compensation Survey. In addition, Hay Group was instructed to develop an executive compensation comparator group of publicly traded companies in the aerospace and defense industry. In selecting the comparator group, Hay Group generally considered companies with revenues of approximately one-half to two times the Company’s revenues and companies in the aerospace and defense industry, excluding those that were exclusively focused on services. The purpose of the comparator group was to compare target and actual compensation levels of the Company’s named executive officers other than the Vice President, Washington Operations to the named executive officers of the comparator group.
The comparator group used for compensation benchmarking in fiscal 2015 was comprised of the following companies:section.
Our Compensation Best Practices
Directly link pay and performance
Stock ownership guidelines for all executive officers
Hold annual shareholder “say on pay” vote
Clawback policy that applies to the annual incentive plan and the 2018 Incentive Plan
No short-sales or speculative transactions of the Company’s securities
MOOG Inc.Heico Corp.
Curtiss Wright Corp.Triumph Group Inc.
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated.Hexcel Corp.
Esterline Technologies Corp.Transdigm Group Inc.
AAR Corp.Woodward Inc.
BE Aerospace Inc.Kaman Corp.
Orbital Sciences Corp.Barnes Group Inc.Compensation Elements for the Named Executive Officers
The comparator group was revised later in 2015 to better reflect the scope and increasing complexities of the Company’s business and industry. The resulting revised peer group was comprised of the original group of companies above with the exception of Transdigm Group Inc. and added Crane Co., Ducommun, Inc., and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
Named Executive Officers for Fiscal 2015
Current executive officers:
Ms. Eileen P. Drake was appointed as COO effective March 2, 2015. Concurrent with Mr. Seymour’s retirement as President and CEO, Ms. Drake was elected CEO and President of the Company on June 1, 2015 and has been appointed to serve as a member of the Company’s Board until the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders and until her successor is duly elected and qualified.
Ms. Kathleen E. Redd serves as Vice President, CFO and Assistant Secretary.
Mr. Christopher C. Cambria serves as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.
Mr. John D. Schumacher serves as Vice President, Washington Operations.

28


Mr. Mark A. Tucker was appointed to serve as the Company’s COO on June 25, 2015. Previously, Mr. Tucker served as Senior Vice President, Enterprise Operations and Engineering of Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. since October 2013.
Former executive officers:
The President and CEO, Mr. Seymour, retired from the Company effective June 1, 2015. In connection with his retirement, Mr. Seymour resigned as President and CEO and as a director of the Company’s Board. Mr. Seymour continued to serve in a consulting capacity through December 31, 2015 which facilitated the transition of leadership.
Compensation Elements
The compensation program for executive officers has historically consisted of the following principal elements:
Base salary;salaries;
Short-term annual cash incentive awards;
Long-term compensation equity incentive awards, including restricted stock, performance-based restricted stock, stock options and cash-settled SARs; and
In-serviceOther benefits such as in-service and post-retirement/employment benefits - pension and 401(k) savings plans; however, defined benefit pension benefits were frozen effective fiscal 2009.
The Organization & Compensation Committee believes that these elements of compensation create a flexible package that reflects the long-term nature of the Company’s businesses and rewards both short-short-term and long-term

33



performance of the Company and each individual in accordance with the objectives of the compensation program. A description of these four components and related programs follows.
Base Salaries
Base salaries are used to provide a fixed amount of compensation for each executive’s regular work. Base salary increases for the CEO and President and the other NEOs must be approved by the Organization & Compensation Committee. Base salary increases for other executivesofficers of the Company must be approved by the CEO and President. Typically, the effective date of merit increases in base salaries is in late March or early April of each year. Base salary increases can also occur upon an executive’s promotion. In determining the amount of any increases in salaries, the Organization & Compensation Committee and/or CEO and President (i) evaluates the executive’s performance in the most recent fiscal year as well as the strategic importance of the executive to the Company; (ii) compares current base, target total cash and target total direct compensation with compensation for relevant executive positions set forth in peer group and survey benchmarking prepared by Hay GroupKorn Ferry as well as industry-specific compensation surveys; and (iii) takes into account the timing and amount of the last salary increase for each of the executives.
In fiscal 2015,2018, the Organization & Compensation Committee and/or the former President and CEO approved an increase in base salary for certain of the Company’s named executive officersNEOs based on several factors, including each individual’s performance, sustained levels of contribution to the Company, the wage increase during the previous fiscal year, a review of the executive and senior management total compensation study conducted by Hay GroupKorn Ferry in 20142018 on the Company’s behalf, andbehalf. The table below shows the base salaries of the NEOs for 2018 compared with respect to Ms. Drake, Ms. Redd and Messrs. Cambria, Tucker, and Seymour, the total compensation of similarly situated executive officers included in the comparator group developed by Hay Group. Based on the foregoing and as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table, Ms. Redd’s base salary increased 3.00%, Mr. Cambria’s base salary increased 4.00%, and Mr. Schumacher’s base salary increased 4.00%. Ms. Drake and Mr. Tucker received increases of 40.00% and 19.00% respectively, in connection with their promotions.2017.

29
Name2018 Base Salary2017 Base Salary% Increase
Eileen P. Drake$825,000
$728,000
13.3%
Mark A. Tucker472,443
454,272
4.0%
Paul R. Lundstrom460,616
442,900
4.0%
John D. Schumacher372,909
351,801
6.0%
Arjun L. Kampani361,660
338,000
7.0%


Short-term Annual Cash Incentive ProgramAwards
The primary objective of our annual cash incentive program is to drive current fiscal year performance and achievement of designated strategic business and financial goals, and to the extent these goals are achieved, to provide competitive compensation to our senior management team. To those ends, the Organization & Compensation Committee sets performance targets such that total cash compensation (base salary plus annual cash incentive) will be within a competitive range of total cash compensation against the market if performance targets are met.
In addition, our senior management team has individual performance targets. The annual cash incentive program follows our “pay-for-performance” philosophy. If business metrics are met at the threshold level, cash incentives for individual performance targets are paid; if such minimum threshold metrics are not met, no cash incentives for individual performance targets are paid. If metrics are met at the maximum or higher, the Organization & Compensation Committee has discretion to adjust payments to the executives. The Organization & Compensation Committee has discretion to increase, reduce or eliminate payments within the parameters ofunder the cash incentive program.
Fiscal 20152018 performance targets consisted of contract profit, operatingadjusted EBITDAP, cash flow contract awards,from operations, Aerojet Rocketdyne bookings and certain other individual goals. The Organization & Compensation Committee, withgoals and had a 12-month performance period. With the input offrom our CEO and President; Vice President, CFOour Executive Chairman; our VP, CFO; our VP Human Resources Business Partners and Assistant Secretary;Labor Relations (“HRBP”); and Vice President or Senior Directorour VP, Chief Human Resources;Resources Officer (“CHRO”), the Organization & Compensation Committee:
sets the overall Company and individual performance objectives and corresponding performance and payout ranges for the fiscal year;
establishes a threshold, target threshold, and maximum incentive opportunity for each executive officer; and
measures performance and determines awards for the prior fiscal year.
Annual cash incentives are paid at the beginning of each fiscal year for the prior fiscal year’s performance. Incentives paid are based upon the Organization & Compensation Committee’s (with input from the CEO and President; Vice President, CFOthe Executive Chairman; the VP, CFO; and Assistant Secretary; and Vice President or Senior Director of Human Resources)the VP, CHRO) assessment of actual performance (individually and Company-wide)

34



against pre-established Company and business segment performance objectives, as appropriate, to determine the amount payable with respect to the applicable target incentive opportunity.
The Organization & Compensation Committee tailors both performance measures and targets in order to most accurately approximate success criteria for both of our business segments and the Company’s performance overall. The payout levels are subject to change every year. For fiscal 2015,2018, our current named executive officers are subject toNEOs were eligible for a target payout level (as a percentage of base salary) based on their position in the Company, and will receive the following percentages of their base salary based on actual achievement of the performance measuresas set forth below:
Eileen P. Drake, CEO and President — 75% for the first half of the fiscal year and- 100% for the second half of the fiscal year;
Kathleen E. Redd, Vice President, CFO and Assistant Secretary — 65%;
Mark A. Tucker, COO — 55% for the first half of the fiscal year and 65% for the second half of the fiscal year;- 75%;
Paul R. Lundstrom, VP, CFO - 75%;
John D. Schumacher, Vice President,Senior VP, Washington Operations — 55%- 65%; and
Christopher C. Cambria, Vice President,Arjun L. Kampani, VP, General Counsel and Secretary — 55%- 65%.
Mr. Seymour’s payout level was 125%, however due to his retirement he is not eligible to receive the annual cash incentive payment for fiscal 2015.    


30


The Corporate criteria for the annual cash incentives used in fiscal 2015for 2018 performance applicable to all of the NEOs were the following:
following (non-GAAP financial measures are identified with asterisks):
Executive Targets 
Threshold
Opportunity
Target
Opportunity
Maximum
Opportunity
  Actual  Performance Corporate  Actual  Performance Aerojet RocketdyneActual  Achievement CorporateActual  Achievement Aerojet Rocketdyne
(Dollars in millions) 
Contract Profit(1)
 12.5%25.0%50.0% $130.5
$130.5
—%—%
Ÿ Threshold — $155.6
        
Ÿ Target — $172.3
         
Ÿ Maximum — $198.7
   
     
Operating Cash Flow12.5%25.0%50.0% $29.1
$110.0
21.9%16.8%
Corporate (2)
Aerojet Rocketdyne(3)
        
Ÿ Threshold — $16.6
Ÿ Threshold — $104.3
        
Ÿ Target — $33.3
Ÿ Target — $121.0
        
Ÿ Maximum — $59.7
Ÿ Maximum — $147.4
   
     
Contract Awards(4)
 12.5%25.0%50.0% $1,837.9
$1,837.9
50.0%50.0%
Ÿ Threshold — $1,300.0
        
Ÿ Target — $1,453.8
        
Ÿ Maximum — $1,599.2
   
     
Personal Factors(5)
 12.5%25.0%37.5% —
—
—%—%
Ÿ Threshold — 0 x multiplier
        
Ÿ Target — 1 x multiplier
   
     
Totals  
 50.0%100.0%187.5%
(6) 
  71.9%66.8%
Executive Targets
Threshold
Opportunity
Target
Opportunity
Maximum
Opportunity
  Actual  PerformanceActual  Achievement
(Dollars in Millions)
Adjusted EBITDAP*
15.0%30.0%60.0% $308.8
60.0%
Ÿ Threshold — $206.7
      
Ÿ Target — $229.7
      
Ÿ Maximum — $275.6
   
   
Cash Flow from Operations15.0%30.0%60.0% $252.7
60.0%
Ÿ Threshold — $ 130.0
      
Ÿ Target — $ 144.4
      
Ÿ Maximum — $ 173.3
   
   
Aerojet Rocketdyne Bookings15.0%30.0%60.0% $2,201.1
52.7%
Ÿ Threshold — $ 1,721.1
      
Ÿ Target — $ 1,912.3
      
Ÿ Maximum — $ 2,294.8
   
   
Personal Factors5.0%10.0%20.0%  20.0%
Ÿ Threshold — 0 x multiplier
      
Ÿ Target — 1 x multiplier
   
   
Totals  
50.0%100.0%200.0%  192.7%
* These are non-GAAP financial measures. For more information, see Appendix A - Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
(1)We defined Contract Profit to be net sales recognized for our Aerospace and Defense segment less cost of sales of our Aerospace and Defense segment, exclusive of certain corporate costs, certain retirement benefit costs and other non-contract related costs.
(2)
Adjusted EBITDAP: earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and retirement benefit expense net of amounts that are recoverable under the Company’s U.S. government contracts adjusted for unusual items and Board approved modifications.
Cash Flow from Operations: the Company’s cash provided by operating activities per GAAP.
Aerojet Rocketdyne Bookings: the amount of money to be received for a contract of our Aerospace and Defense segment for which funding is authorized and has been directly appropriated and contractually obligated by the customer.
Personal Factors: based upon the assessment of performance related to Company goals and objectives, and individual and leadership competencies.
Under the terms of the Company’s annual incentive plan, the NEOs had the opportunity to earn up to 2x the following payout levels as a percent of base salary: 100% for Ms. Drake; 75% for Messrs. Tucker and Lundstrom; and 65% for Messrs. Schumacher and Kampani.

35



We defined Corporate Operating Cash Flow to be the Company’s cash provided by operating activities net of cash used in financing activities, exclusive of debt issuance costs, repayments on debt and proceeds from the issuance of debt.
(3)
We defined Aerojet Rocketdyne Operating Cash Flow to be the Aerospace and Defense segment cash provided by operating activities net of cash used in financing activities, exclusive of debt issuance costs, repayments on debt and proceeds from the issuance of debt.
(4)We defined Contract Awards to be the amount of money to be received for a contract of our Aerospace and Defense segment that has been directly appropriated by the U.S. Congress or for which a purchase order has been received from a commercial customer.
(5)Personal Factors are only applicable after achieving all three financial metrics at the threshold level.
(6)Under the terms of the Company’s annual incentive plan, each named executive officer has the opportunity to earn up to 187.5% of his or her base salary multiplied by the following payout levels: 75% for first half of the fiscal year and 100% for the second half of the fiscal year for Ms. Drake; 65% for Ms. Redd; 55% for Mr. Cambria; 55% for Mr. Schumacher; and 55% for the first half of the fiscal year and 65% for the second half of the fiscal year for Mr. Tucker if the performance goals are achieved at the maximum level.
The calculations for the final payment of the annual cash incentive award for each named executive officerNEO for fiscal 20152018 performance were as follows, which are also reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the 2018 Summary Compensation Table, which follows this Compensation Discussion and Analysis:

31


Name
Payout
Level
Base SalaryCash Incentive Awards
Award at
100%
Target
Performance
Award at
187.5%
Maximum
Performance
Actual
Performance
Achievement
Percentage		Discretionary Award Percentage
Actual
Payout at
Achievement
Percentage
Eileen P. Drake 1st half (1)
75%$500,000
$187,500
$351,563
71.9%35.0%$200,437
Eileen P. Drake 2nd half (1)
100%700,000
350,000
656,250
71.9%35.0%374,150
Eileen Drake Total  537,500
1,007,813
  574,587
Kathleen E. Redd65%416,654
270,825
507,797
71.9%35.0%289,512
Mark A. Tucker 1st half (2)
55%420,000
115,500
216,563
66.8%35.0%117,579
Mark A. Tucker 2nd half (2)
65%420,000
136,500
255,938
66.8%35.0%138,957
Mark A. Tucker Total  252,000
472,501
  256,536
John D. Schumacher55%325,260
178,893
335,424
71.9%35.0%191,237
Christopher C. Cambria55%351,419
193,280
362,401
71.9%—%138,969
NameTarget Payout LevelBase Salary
Award at
100%
Target
Performance
Award at
200%
Maximum
Performance
Actual
Performance
Achievement
Percentage
Actual
Payout at
Achievement
Percentage
Eileen P. Drake100%$825,000
$825,000
$1,650,000
192.7%$1,589,775
Mark A. Tucker75%472,443
354,332
708,665
192.7%682,798
Paul R. Lundstrom75%460,616
345,462
690,924
192.7%665,705
John D. Schumacher65%372,909
242,391
484,782
192.7%467,087
Arjun L. Kampani65%361,660
235,079
470,158
192.7%452,997

(1)Per Ms. Drake’s employment agreement, the payout level for the first six months of the annual cash incentive award is 75% and the payout level for the last six month is 100%.
(2)Mr. Tucker’s payout level for the first six months of the annual cash incentive award is 55% and the payout level for the last six months is 65%.
Determining the Individual Compensation of Named Executive Officers
The Company’s performance and the named executive officer’s individual performance, measured against the annual performance goals for each, are used to determine each named executive officer’s target cash incentive award as well as each named executive officer’s individual performance and contribution as related to the achievement of such performance goals. In order for the named executive officer’s individual performance to be a factor in their cash incentive award, the Company must first achieve all three financial metrics at the threshold level. Once all three financial metrics are achieved, for each named executive officer, other than the CEO and President, the Organization & Compensation Committee considers individual performance, as assessed by the CEO and President. Individual performance of the CEO and President is assessed directly by the Organization & Compensation Committee.
For fiscal 2015, personal performance factors were not included in the Organization & Compensation Committee’s determination of the size of each named executive officer’s 2015 annual incentive payment given that the Company did not achieve the threshold level of performance for its contract profit financial metric.
On February 18, 2016,28, 2019, the Organization & Compensation Committee met and approved fiscal 20152018 annual cash incentive awards, which are reported above and in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the 2018 Summary Compensation Table, which follows this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Long-Term Incentives (Equity-Based Compensation)Equity Incentive Awards
The Company, upon the recommendation and approval of the Organization & Compensation Committee, established the performance objectives and other terms of the Company’s 20152018 Long-Term Incentive Program (the “2015“2018 LTIP”) for executive officers and other eligible employees of the Company. The 20152018 LTIP has a 36-month performance period for performance-based grants and a three-year vesting period for service-based grants. The Company uses long-term incentive compensation for executives to reinforce four strategic objectives:
to focus on the importance of returns to stockholders;
to promote the achievement of long-term performance goals;
to encourage executive retention; and
to promote higher levels of Company stock ownership by executives for increased alignment with stockholder interests.

32


Historically, the Company has strived to provide a sizable portion of the named executive officer’sNEOs’ compensation in an equity-based form. This type of compensation, coupled with the Company’s share ownership guidelines, will result in the executives becoming stockholders with considerable personal financial interest in the fiscal health and performance of the Company.
The amount of equity-based awards granted to executives has been determined by subtracting theeach executive’s annual cash compensation opportunity from the total targeted annualdirect compensation that is competitive with the market based on SEC filings for our peer group and broad basedbroad-based industry studies. The ultimate value of these equity-based awards at grant has been driven in part by the executive’s performance in the past fiscal year and in part by theirhis or her ability to increase the value of the Company going forward.
Our equity-based compensation in fiscal 20152018 for the named executive officersNEOs included awards of service-based stock options,SARs and performance-based restricted stock and is more fully described as follows:
Stock optionsSARs (service-based) —- A grant of Stock optionsSARs represents the right to purchase the Company’s stock atreceive a fixed price forpayment, during a defined period of time. Thetime in the future (assuming continued employment), of an amount equal to the increase in measured value of stock options reflects the difference between the value of shares of Common Stock at the time of exercisea specified number of the stock options and a predetermined exercise price. Stock optionsCompany’s Common Stock. SARs are designed to attract and retain executives by compensating them for increases in shareholderstockholder value over time. Time-based stock optionsService-based SARs are generally exercisable inafter three years from the date of grant. All stock optionsSARs have a seven-year contractual life from the date of grant. As with restricted stock grants, executivesExecutives who voluntarily resign or are terminated for cause immediately forfeit all unvested stock optionsSARs unless otherwise determined by the Organization & Compensation Committee.
Restricted stock (performance-based) —- A grant of performance-based restricted stock is an award of shares of Common Stock that vests over a period of time after the grant date (depending upon the vesting conditions set by the Organization & Compensation Committee) provided that the relevant performance goals are met. Performance-based restricted stock awards are designed to drive financial performance as the awards vest from 50% to 200% of target based on performance, and attract and retain executives by

36



providing them with some of the benefits associated with stock ownership during the restriction period, while incentivizing them to remain with the Company. During the restricted performance period, the executives may not sell, transfer, pledge, assign or otherwise convey their restricted stock. However, executives may vote their shares and are entitled to receive dividend payments, if any are made. Executives who voluntarily resign or are terminated for cause prior to the end of the restriction period forfeit their restricted stock unless otherwise determined by the Organization & Compensation Committee.
The Company believes that continual analysis and alignment to shareholder value creation is an important partIn determining the grants of an executive compensation program. Therefore, the 20152018 LTIP, a 75% weighting was designed to consists of agiven on performance-based grant of restricted stockawards and a 25% weighting was put on service-based grantawards for the NEOs. This mix was given to promote the achievement of stock options. long-term performance goals to add value to the Company, focus on returns to stockholders, encourage retention and align with our pay-for-performance philosophy.
The grants for the 20152018 LTIP were made on March 30, 2015.in February of 2018. The performance-based grants vest on or about January 31, 2018,February 28, 2021, based on meeting performance targets for the three yearthree-year performance period ending November 30, 2017December 31, 2020, and subject to approval by the Organization & Compensation Committee in early 2018.2021. The service-based grants vest on March 30, 2018. See the 2015 Grantsin February of Plan-Based Awards table for share amounts and grant date fair value of these grants specific to the named executive officers.2021.
The performance metrics for the performance-based grant areare: revenue, adjusted EBITDAP and ROIC cumulative CIP Phase I investments, and cumulative CIP Phase I savings and consists of a grant of performance-based restricted stock.metrics for the performance period. The vesting of the performance-based restricted stock depends on the level of achievement against target, with a minimum threshold level, and ranges from 50% to 200% of the target award. No performance-based restricted stock will vest if the threshold level of performance against all the specified metrics is not achieved. Participants
Our equity-based compensation in 2018 for the performanceNEOs includes two additional components of awards under the 2009 Incentive Plan and the 2018 Incentive Plan consisting of service-based restricted stock and stock price performance-based restricted stock and is more fully described as follows:
Restricted stock (service-based) - A grant included allof service-based restricted stock is an award of shares of Common Stock that vests over a period of time after the grant date (assuming continued employment). Service-based stock is designed to attract and retain executives. Service-based restricted shares generally vest in 1/3 increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the named executive officers, however, Mr. Seymour’s grant was canceleddate. During the restricted period, the executives may not sell, transfer, pledge, assign or otherwise convey their restricted stock. However, executives may vote their shares and are entitled to receive dividend payments, if any are made. Executives who voluntarily resign or are terminated for cause prior to the end of the restriction period forfeit their restricted stock unless otherwise determined by the Organization & Compensation Committee.
Restricted stock (stock price performance-based) - A grant of stock price performance-based restricted stock is an award of shares of Common Stock that vests over a period of time after the grant date (depending upon his retirement.the vesting conditions set by the Organization & Compensation Committee) provided that the relevant share price goals are met and assuming continued employment. Stock price performance-based restricted stock awards are designed to attract and retain executives by compensating them for increases in stockholder value over time. During the restricted performance period, the executives may not sell, transfer, pledge, assign or otherwise convey their restricted stock. However, executives may vote their shares and are entitled to receive dividend payments, if any are made. Executives who voluntarily resign or are terminated for cause prior to the end of the restriction period forfeit their restricted stock unless otherwise determined by the Organization & Compensation Committee.
The service-based grant consistsrestricted stock grants vest in one-third increments on February 27th of time-basedeach year becoming fully vested in 2021. The stock options. The participants of the service-based grant also included all of the named executive officers with Mr. Seymour’s grant being canceledprice performance-based restricted stock vests as follows: one-third upon his retirement.
In determining the grants of the 2015 LTIP, a 75% weighting was given on performance awards and a 25% weighting was put on service-based awards for the named executive officers. This mix was given to promote the achievement of long-term performance goals to adda $34 stock price no later than December 31, 2020; one-third upon the achievement of a $38 stock price no later than December 31, 2021; and one-third upon the achievement of a $42 stock price no later than December 31, 2022. For this purpose, stock prices are determined on the basis of the 20-day volume-weighted average price.
All of the NEOs were participants in the performance-based and stock price performance-based restricted stock grants and the service-based SAR and restricted stock grants made in February of 2018. See the 2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table for share amounts and grant date fair value of these grants specific to the Company, to focus on returns to stockholders, to encourage retention,NEOs.
On February 28, 2019, performance-based grants from the 2016 Long-Term Incentive Program (“2016 LTIP”) vested at 174.6% resulting in 114,724 shares vesting for Ms. Drake, 44,742 shares vesting for Mr. Tucker, 27,720 shares vesting for Mr. Schumacher and to align with our pay-for-performance philosophy.27,090 shares vesting for Mr. Kampani. The performance metrics were Revenue, adjusted EBITDAP, ROIC, cumulative Competitive Improvement Plan (“CIP”) investment and cumulative

3337



Pension Plans, 401(k) Savings Plan and Benefit Restoration PlansCIP savings for the performance period ended December 31, 2018. The 2016 LTIP performance-based awards were granted on April 5, 2016, with a three-year performance period.
Other Benefits
Pension Plans
The Company’s defined benefit pension and benefits restoration plans (“BRP”include the Aerojet Rocketdyne (GenCorp) Consolidated Pension Plan (the “Qualified Pension Plan”), a tax-qualified defined benefit plan; and the 2009 Benefits Restoration Plan for the Aerojet Rocketdyne Pension Plan (the “Pension BRP Plan”), a non-qualified defined benefit plan. These plans are frozen and no longer accruing benefits. Effectiveeffective February 1, 2009, and July 31, 2009, future benefit accruals for all non-collective bargaining-unit employees, including the named executive officers,NEOs and collective bargaining-unit employees respectively, were discontinued. No employees lost their previously earned pension benefits. Only Ms. Redd and Mr. Schumacher participateis the only NEO that has an accrued balance in the same frozen tax-qualifiedQualified Pension Plan and the Pension BRP Plan. Mr. Schumacher’s pension plans as other employees.benefits were earned from his previous employment with the Company beginning June 12, 2006, through the pension freeze date for non-collective bargaining-unit employees of February 1, 2009. All the other named executive officersNEOs do not participate in a pension planthe Qualified Pension Plan or the Pension BRP Plan because their employment commenced after benefit accruals were discontinued. These plans include the Qualified Pension Plan, a tax-qualified defined benefit plan; and the 2009 Pension BRP Plan, a non-qualified defined benefit plan.
The frozen Qualified Pension Plan is a tax-qualified defined benefit plan covering substantially all collective bargaining-unit and non-collective bargaining-unit employees hired before the freeze date. In general, normal retirement age is 65, with certain plan provisions allowing for earlier retirement. Before the freeze date, pension benefits were calculated under formulas based on compensation and length of service for salaried employees and under negotiated non-wage based formulas for bargaining-unit and hourly employees. Participants will receive the highest benefit calculated under any of the formulas for which they were eligible to participate through the freeze date.
Total pension benefits for the named executive officers and certain other highly compensated employees were determined under a combination of the frozen 2009 Pension BRP Plan, which is a non-qualified plan, and the frozen Qualified Pension Plan. As set forth above, the frozen Qualified Pension Plan is a qualified pension plan that provides pension benefits for employees, the amount of which is limited under Section 401(a)(17) or 415 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) (or any successor provisions). The frozen 2009 Pension BRP Plan restored the pension plan benefits which executives and their beneficiaries would otherwise lose as a result of the limitations under Section 401(a)(17) or 415 of the Code (or any successor provisions). Eligibility to participate in the frozen 2009 Pension BRP Plan was designated by the Organization & Compensation Committee. Further details regarding benefits under these plans, including the estimated value of retirementpension benefits for each named executive officer,Mr. Schumacher, are found in the section entitled 20152018 Pension Benefits on page 44.51.
401(k) Savings Plan
The named executive officersNEOs are also eligible to participate in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan, (“Savings Plan”) a 401(k) tax-qualified defined contribution savings plan which is available to all Company employees. Employees may contribute up to 50% of their eligible pay in any combination of before-tax, regular after-tax, or after-tax Roth contributions subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) limits. The Company matches 100% of the first 3% of employee contributions, and 50% of the next 3% of employee contributions for all participating employees.
2009 401(k) Benefits Restoration Plan
The named executive officersNEOs are eligible to participate in the related non-qualified, unfunded 2009 Benefits Restoration Plan for the Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. 401(k) Plan (the “2009 (“401(k) BRP Plan”) which enables participants to defer their, a non-qualified, unfunded plan maintained primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation onfor a pre-tax basis.select group of management or highly compensated employees. The Company matchesmay match 401(k) BRP employee contributions ifto the participant has reachedextent that after the 402(g) limit inend of any plan year, any additional Company matching contributions that would have been made on the participant’s behalf under the Savings Plan during the plan year if: (i) the compensation deferral percentage elected under the 401(k) BRP Plan for the plan year had been applied under the Savings Plan; and (ii) the participant’s contributions under the Savings Plan were not limited by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) limitations applicable to the Savings Plan. Details about the 2009 401(k) BRP Plan are presented in the section entitled 2015 Non-qualified2018 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation on page 45.52.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The NEOs are eligible to participate in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). However, no employee may participate in the ESPP if immediately after an option is granted the employee owns shares of Common Stock, including shares which the employee may purchase by conversion of convertible securities or under outstanding options granted by the Company, possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of Common Stock of the Company. The Board may impose restrictions on eligibility and participation of employees who are officers and Directors to facilitate compliance with federal or state securities laws or foreign laws. The ESPP allows employees to purchase up to 1,000 shares of Common Stock per year (500 per semi-annual offering period) at 85% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the purchase date on which the stock is purchased.
Severance Benefits
The Company does not have a severance plan in place for the current NEOs with the exception of Ms. Drake. The Company has a policy for a reduction in force, pursuant to which Messrs. Tucker, Lundstrom, Schumacher and Kampani, as well as all other employees of the Company are eligible to participate. The policy provides for employees to continue participating in health, welfare and retirement benefit plans for a period of two months per the terms of the applicable plans and subject to all conditions thereof. Upon execution of a release, the NEO is

38



eligible to receive separation pay of five weeks’ pay plus one additional week’s pay for each full or partial year of service, with the maximum amount of separation pay being 30 weeks’ pay. In addition, with an executed release, the NEO is eligible to continue participation in certain health and welfare benefits for a total period of six months from the date of reduction in force. Overlapping benefits under both the standard and enhanced benefits provisions will be inclusive in this six-month period.
The Company does have an executive change in control severance policy (the “CIC Policy”). The CIC Policy provides certain executive officers of the Company who have been designated in writing by the Board, including all of the NEOs other than Ms. Drake, with compensation and benefits upon a termination of their employment by the Company without “cause” or by the executive for “good reason” (including due to an executive’s death or disability) within the six-month period preceding a “change in control” through the 18-month period following a “change in control” (each as defined in the CIC Policy).
In the event of an applicable termination of employment, the executive shall be entitled to the following:
lump sum payment equal to executive’s annual base salary;
prorated portion of incentive compensation under the Company’s Short-Term Incentive Plan (“STIP”) to the “termination date” (as defined in the CIC Policy) and full STIP payment for the prior year if unpaid as of the termination date, each based upon actual performance;
lump sum payment equal to the target incentive compensation executive could have received under the STIP for the entire year in which the termination date occurs;
payment of Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“COBRA”) benefit premiums until the earlier of the 12-month anniversary of the termination date or when eligible for health insurance coverage through another employer;
to the extent unvested, immediate full vesting of all of the executive’s equity awards; and
outplacement services for a period of 12 months starting no later than 90 days from date of termination with a maximum value of $15,000.
Receipt of compensation and benefits under the CIC Policy is contingent on the executive’s timely execution of a release in a form prescribed by the Company.
Other
The Aerojet Rocketdyne Foundation matches all employee and Director gifts to accredited, non-profit colleges, universities, secondary and elementary public or private schools located in the United States. Gifts made are matched dollar for dollar up to $1,000 per calendar year per donor.
Administration of the Executive Compensation Program
The Organization & Compensation Committee determines most matters of executive compensation and benefits, although the committee has delegated to the CEO and President the authority to establish base salaries and annual incentive compensation of the officers of the Company other than herself, and the NEOs. Our CEO and President; our Executive Chairman; our VP, CFO; our VP, HRBP; and our VP, CHRO provided input to the Organization & Compensation Committee with respect to the 2018 compensation program. The Organization & Compensation Committee reviews and approves the total compensation for the CEO and President and the other NEOs.
In assessing competitive overall compensation, the Organization & Compensation Committee engages, from time to time, an independent outside consulting firm to aid in the review and evaluation of the total compensation provided to the NEOs. Since 2010, the Company has retained Korn Ferry (which includes Hay Group prior to its acquisition) to review the design of the Company’s annual and long-term incentive programs and to assist in developing an executive compensation structure that is based on the internal hierarchy of jobs and is aligned with external market practices. In performing its duties, Korn Ferry worked with senior management and the Chairman of the Organization & Compensation Committee to understand the Company’s business strategy, the competitive market for talent and the accountabilities of the executives and perceptions of the Company’s current compensation programs. Korn Ferry was also instructed to develop an executive compensation comparator group of publicly traded companies in the aerospace and defense industry. Based on the information presented by Korn Ferry and input from our CEO and President; our Executive Chairman; our VP, CFO; our VP, HRBP; and our VP, CHRO, the

39



Organization & Compensation Committee exercised its business judgment in setting base salaries and incentive compensation levels and correlating performance levels for incentive-based compensation for the NEOs.
Independent Executive Compensation Consultant’s Role
Both management and the Organization & Compensation Committee retain Korn Ferry to provide objective analysis, advice and information to each of them, including competitive market data and compensation recommendations related to the CEO and President, the Executive Chairman, other senior executives and the Board. Korn Ferry served as the independent executive compensation consultant to management and to the Organization & Compensation Committee during 2018. The executive compensation consultant reports to the Chairman of the Organization & Compensation Committee and the VP, CHRO (and formerly our VP, HRBP), and has direct access to the other members of the Organization & Compensation Committee as well as senior management. The fees incurred in 2018 for compensation services provided by Korn Ferry to management and the Organization & Compensation Committee related to executive and Director compensation totaled $144,615. These fees were driven by Korn Ferry’s annual assistance with our executive compensation programs. In addition, Korn Ferry provided certain services to the Company at the request of management consisting of senior executive searches totaling $846,057. The total fees incurred for the services provided by Korn Ferry to the Company in 2018 were $990,672.
The Organization & Compensation Committee believes Korn Ferry’s work for the Company, consisting of senior executive searches, did not raise a conflict of interest and did not impair Korn Ferry’s ability to provide independent advice to the Organization & Compensation Committee concerning executive compensation matters.
In making the overall determination of the independence of Korn Ferry and their lead advisor to the Organization & Compensation Committee, the Organization & Compensation Committee considered, among other things, the factors on independence adopted in final SEC rules and approved in NYSE listing standards.
The decisions made by the Organization & Compensation Committee are the responsibility of the Organization & Compensation Committee and may reflect factors and considerations other than the information and recommendations provided by Korn Ferry.
Consideration of Competitive Market Data Regarding Executive Compensation
The Organization & Compensation Committee and the CEO and President used the results of the compensation study completed by Korn Ferry in early 2018 to determine pay for 2018. The Organization & Compensation Committee set base salaries, target annual cash incentive levels and target annual long-term incentive award values for the NEOs generally at or below the 50th percentile of competitive market levels for comparable aerospace and defense companies. This approach was the starting point of the analysis, then adjustments were made to some executives’ target compensation to reflect other factors such as the executives’ experience, breadth of responsibilities, tenure in the position, overall individual performance and the Company’s performance overall.
The study conducted by Korn Ferry in early 2018 compared total executive compensation against similarly sized U.S. companies in the aerospace and defense industry and in the broader general industry, using data from Korn Ferry’s Executive Compensation Survey. In addition, Korn Ferry was instructed to develop an executive compensation comparator group of publicly traded companies in the aerospace and defense industry. In selecting the comparator group, the Company generally considered companies with revenues of approximately one-half to two times the Company’s revenues and companies in the aerospace and defense industry, excluding those that were exclusively focused on services. The purpose of the comparator group was to compare target and actual compensation levels of the Company’s NEOs to the NEOs of the comparator group. Minor changes were made to the 2018 comparator group from the group used for compensation benchmarking in 2017.

40



The table below shows information for the comparator group used for benchmarking for 2018 compensation:
 (Dollars in millions)
 
Fiscal 2017
Sales
Fiscal 2017 Net Income (Loss)Market Capitalization on 12/31/2017
Company
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc.$1,877
$(9)$2,296
    
AAR Corp.1,591
57
1,365
Barnes Group Inc.1,436
59
3,392
Crane Co.2,786
173
5,293
Cubic Corp.1,108
(11)1,599
Curtiss Wright Corp.2,271
215
5,377
Esterline Technologies Corp.2,000
112
2,240
Heico Corp.1,525
208
7,964
Hexcel Corp.1,973
284
5,554
Kaman Corp.1,806
50
1,638
MOOG Inc.2,498
140
3,108
Orbital ATK Inc.4,688
313
7,586
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated.2,604
227
6,419
Triumph Group Inc.3,533
(43)1,350
Woodward Inc.2,099
201
4,672
Policies
Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines
In order to strengthen the alignment between the financial interests of stockholders and the financial interests of executives of the Company, the Organization & Compensation Committee approved revisedhas share ownership guidelines that apply to the Company’s executive officers. Under these guidelines, each executive officer is expected to have equity in the Company equal in aggregate market value to a designated multiple of such officer’s annual salary.
The multiples are as follows:
Executive Chairman and CEO —and President - six times CEO base salary;
CFO, COO and General Counsel —- three times base salary;
Senior Vice Presidents —VPs - two times base salary;
and all other Vice Presidents —VPs subject to the guidelines - one timestime base salary.
In calculating the amount of equity owned by an executive, the Organization & Compensation Committee looks at the value of Company stock owned by the executive which includes vested or unvested restricted stock as well as

34


unvested performance-based restricted shares at the percentage expected to vest, and the value of any vested “in the money” stock options or SARs (i.e. market value of stock in excess of the strike price for the stock option or SAR.) Newly appointed executives are expected to be in compliance with the ownership guidelines within five years of their appointments. Each executive is required to retain 50% of his or her net shares obtained through vesting of shares or exercising stock options until the executive is in compliance with the established guidelines. Executives must remain in compliance with the established guidelines after any sale of shares of the Company’s Common Stock.
As of November 30, 2015, notDecember 31, 2018, all of the named executive officersNEOs held equity in the Company equal in market value to the guidelines in place at that time. However, those that do not meet the requirement are in the transition period set forth in the guidelines and are anticipated to meet the guidelines by the end of the transition period. The Organization & Compensation Committee routinely reviews the guidelines and considers adjustments when appropriate. The following table shows the current status of equity ownership for each current named executive officerNEO as of November 30, 2015.December 31, 2018.

41



Name
Value of Equity    
Ownership*    
Date of ElectionYears as an Officer
Value of Equity    
Ownership*    
Date of ElectionYears as an Officer
Eileen P. Drake$3,855,310
03/02/20150.8$15,005,918
03/02/20153.8
Kathleen E. Redd4,496,912
01/21/20096.9
Mark A. Tucker773,391
10/07/20132.25,589,047
10/07/20135.2
Paul R. Lundstrom3,348,202
11/07/20162.2
John D. Schumacher655,812
04/29/20132.63,790,028
04/29/20135.7
Christopher C. Cambria1,239,815
09/12/20114.2
Arjun L. Kampani3,066,091
04/11/20162.7
*Value is based on the stock price on November 30, 2015December 31, 2018, of $17.54.$35.23.
Transactions in Company Securities
The Company’s insider trading policy prohibits Directors, officers and employees from engaging in certain short-term or speculative transactions involving the securities of the Company. Pursuant to the policy, Directors, officers and employees may not engage in short sales of the Company’s stock nor buy or sell puts, future contracts, or other forms of derivative securities relating to the Company’s securities.
Clawbacks
Both the 2018 annual incentive program, under which annual cash incentives are paid, and the 2018 Incentive Plan include provisions for seeking the return (clawback) from participants of incentive cash payments and stock sale proceeds in the event that those amounts had been inflated due to financial results that later had to be restated. In addition, both plans provide that the Organization & Compensation Committee must first determine that the applicable participant engaged in misconduct contributing to the reason for the misstatement.
Impact of Accounting Guidance for Stock-Based Compensation
The accounting standards applicable to stock-based compensation are one factor that the Company and the Organization & Compensation Committee consider in the design of its long-term equity incentive programs. Other factors include the link to the performance that each vehicle provides, the degree of upside leverage and downside risk inherent in each vehicle, the impact on dilution and overhang that the vehicles have, and the role that each vehicle has in the attraction, retention and motivation of our executive and key employee talent. The Company monitors its stock-based compensation expense to confirm that it is reasonable, but expense will not be the most important factor in making decisions about our long-term incentive plans.
Tax Deductibility under Section 162(m)
Section 162(m) of the Code limits the amount of compensation that may be deducted by the Company for federal income tax purposes to $1,000,000 for compensation paid to our CEO and President, our VP, CFO, and our other three most highly compensated executive officers that must be reported to stockholders under the Exchange Act (referred to as “covered employees”). Prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, “performance-based” compensation that has been approved by our stockholders and otherwise satisfies the performance-based requirements under Section 162(m) of the Code is not subject to the Code’s $1,000,000 deduction limit. The 2017 tax legislation eliminated the performance-based exemption, expanded the group of “covered employees” subject to the limitations of Section 162(m) of the Code, and made “covered employee” status permanent, even after an employee’s termination of employment (including by death). While the Organization & Compensation Committee prefers compensation paid to our NEOs to be tax deductible under the Code, the Organization & Compensation Committee also recognizes the need to retain flexibility to make compensation decisions that may not meet the limitations of Section 162(m) when it determines is necessary or appropriate to enable the Company to continue to attract, retain, reward and motivate its highly qualified executives. Therefore, we reserve the right to design programs that recognize a full range of performance criteria important to our success, even where the compensation paid under such programs may not be deductible.

42



Limited Government Reimbursement of Compensation
As a government contractor, the Company is subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which limits the reimbursement of costs by our government customers for senior executive compensation to a benchmark compensation cap established each year. The cap applies to all employees of the Company. Any amounts over the cap are considered unallowable and, therefore, not billed to the government.
Say on Pay
In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Company provides our stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote regarding the compensation of our NEOs. At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. held on May 8, 2018, 99% of the votes cast (excluding those who abstained or were broker non-votes) were in favor of the Company’s executive compensation program as described in that year’s annual Proxy Statement. After considering the outcome of this advisory vote and other relevant facts and circumstances relating to the Company’s executive pay, the Organization & Compensation Committee determined not to make any changes to our executive compensation policies as a result of the vote.
Employment Agreement, Transition Agreement and Plan Provisions
Eileen P. Drake Employment Agreement
On November 23, 2015,March 13, 2018, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with EileenMs. Drake, pursuant to which Ms. Drake agreed to continue to serve as the Company’s CEO and President. The agreement provides for an initial one-year term, which will be automatically extended, upon the same terms and conditions, for successive one-year periods unless either party, at least 60 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term, gives written notice to the other of its intention not to renew such employment. The agreement provides that Ms. Drake will receive an annual base salary of $700,000,increase from $728,000 to $825,000 with such base salary increase effective retroactive to June 1, 2015.March 24, 2018. Additionally, the agreement provides to Ms. Drake, among other things, (i) a one-time bonus of $200,000; (ii) an annual bonus based on a target opportunity pursuant to the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan which shall be adopted annually by the Board which for fiscal 2015 will be up to 75% of Ms. Drake’s base salary for the first six months of the fiscal year and up to(currently at 100% of Ms. Drake’sannual base salary for the last six monthssalary); and (ii) annual equity awards based on a target opportunity of the fiscal year, with such target bonuses to be pro-rated to reflect the partial performance period in the first six months; and (iii) a grant of 120,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in the form of performance shares (the “Promotion Award”345.5% (increased from 200%) pursuant to the terms and conditions of the 2009 Incentive Plan with a vesting year term from fiscal 2015 to fiscaland the 2018 40,000 of which shall vest if environmental remediation reimbursement advancement agreements are achieved, 40,000 of which shall vest if competitive improvement program restructuring execution is achieved, and 40,000 of which shall vest if AR1 program achievement is attained.  In addition, Ms. Drake will be eligible to participate in future grants pursuant to the 2009 Incentive Plan with a target opportunity of 200% of her base salary in effect for the then-current fiscal year. Plan.
In the event that the Company terminates Ms. Drake’s employment for Cause or Ms. Drake resigns other than for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in the agreement), the Company’s obligations will generally be limited to (i) payment of her base salary accrued up to and including the date of termination or resignation, to be paid at termination, (ii) payment in lieu of any accrued but unused vacation time, in accordance with the Company’s vacation policy, (iii) payment of any unreimbursed expenses in accordance with the Company’s business reimbursement policy, (iv) immediate vesting of any unvested time-based restricted shares, and (v)(iv) payments and benefits under any Company benefit plan, program or policy that Ms. Drake participated in during employment and paid pursuant to the terms of such plan, program and policy (the “Accrued Obligations”).  

35


If Ms. Drake’s employment is terminated at any time due to her Death or Disability (as such terms are defined in the agreement), Ms. Drake shall be entitled to receive the Accrued Obligations and severance payments and benefits equal to the following: (i) twelve (12) months of her base salary paid in installments; (ii) any bonuses earned and paid by the date of termination; (iii) other than the Promotion Awarda performance-based award granted on November 18, 2015, which shall not vest, to the extent unvested at the time of Ms. Drake’s termination of employment, immediate full vesting of all of Ms. Drake’s equity awards under the 2009 Incentive Plan (at target performance, if applicable);awards; (iv) outplacement services provided by the Company-designated outplacement firm for a period of eighteen (18) months starting no later than ninety (90) days from the date of termination with a maximum value of $25,000; (v) in the case of Death, life insurance benefits paid in accordance with the terms of the policy and coverage in which Ms. Drake was enrolled before the date of Death; and (vi) in the case of termination due to Disability, the Company shall pay for the premiums associated with a six (6) month continuation, without any required contributions from Ms. Drake (but subject to all other plan and policy terms) in Ms. Drake’s Company provided life insurance policy in which she is enrolled before the date of termination; and (vii) provided Ms. Drake timely elects and is eligible for COBRA coverage, the Company shall pay for the premiums associated with six (6) months of Ms. Drake’s continued participation, without any required contributions from Ms. Drake (but subject to all other plan terms, including co-payments and deductibles) in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Medical Plan, the Aerojet

43



Rocketdyne Dental Plan and the Aerojet Rocketdyne Vision Plan (the “Benefit Plans”) in which she is enrolled before the date of termination.   
If Ms. Drake’s employment is terminated at the Company’s election at any time for reasons other than Cause, or by Ms. Drake for Good Reason (and not for Death or Disability or in connection with a change in control), then Ms. Drake shall be entitled to receive the Accrued Obligations and severance payments and benefits equal to the following: (i) twelve (12) months of her base salary paid in installments; (ii) other than the Promotion Awarda performance-based award granted on November 18, 2015 which shall not vest, to the extent unvested at the time of Ms. Drake’s termination of employment, immediate full vesting of all of Ms. Drake’s equity awards under the 2009 Incentive Plan (at target performance, if applicable);awards; (iii) Ms. Drake will have the opportunity to continue to participate in the Company provided life insurance policy in which she is enrolled before the date of termination at an amount of 1x Base Salary for a period of twelve (12) months following the date of termination; (iv) provided Ms. Drake timely elects and is eligible for COBRA coverage, the Company shall pay for the premiums associated with eighteen (18) months of Ms. Drake’s continued participation, without any required contributions from Ms. Drake (but subject to all other plan terms, including co-payments and deductibles) in the Benefit Plans in which Executiveshe is enrolled prior to the date of termination; and (v) outplacement services provided by the Company-designated outplacement firm for a period of eighteen (18) months starting no later than ninety (90) days from the date of termination with a maximum value of $25,000. 
If Ms. Drake’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause (excluding due to a deathDeath or disability)Disability) or by Ms. Drake for Good Reason within eighteen (18) months following a Change in Control (as defined in the Plan)2009 Incentive Plan and the 2018 Incentive Plan or, if more inclusive, such definition set forth in any successor or replacement equity compensation plan of the Company) then Ms. Drake shall be entitled to the following payments and benefits: (i) the Accrued Obligations; (ii) annual target bonus for the pro-rated portion of the fiscal year prior to the Change in Control paid in a lump sum; (iii)  a severance payment equal to eighteen (18) months of (y) Ms. Drake’s base salary and (z) annual target bonus paid in a lump sum; (iv) other than the Promotion Award which shall not vest, to the extent unvested at the time of Ms. Drake’s termination of employment, immediate full vesting of all of Ms. Drake’s equity awards under the 2009 Incentive Plan (at target performance, if applicable);awards; (v) Ms. Drake will have the opportunity to continue to participate in the Company provided life insurance policy in which she is enrolled before the date of termination at an amount of 1x Base Salary for a period of twelve (12) months following the date of termination; (vi) provided Ms. Drake timely elects and is eligible for COBRA coverage, the Company shall pay for the premiums associated with eighteen (18) months of Ms. Drake’s continued participation, without any required contributions from Ms. Drake (but subject to all other plan terms, including co-payments and deductibles) in certain health-related benefit plansthe Benefit Plans in which Ms. Drake is enrolled prior to the date of termination; and (vii) outplacement services provided by the Company-designated outplacement firm for a period of eighteen (18) months starting no later than ninety (90) days from Ms. Drake’s date of termination with a maximum value of $25,000.

36


Scott J. Seymour Transition and General ReleaseMark A. Tucker Retention Agreement
On July 7, 2015December 6, 2018, the Company and Mr. Seymour entered into a Transitionretention agreement (the “Retention Agreement”) with Mr. Tucker, the Company’s COO. The Retention Agreement provides that Mr. Tucker will receive certain consideration if he continues to be employed until March 31, 2020, including (i) continued receipt of his base salary at the level in effect on December 6, 2018; (ii) continued participation in the Company’s STIP in 2019 and General Release Agreement (the “Transition Agreement”) Under2020 (pro-rated based on full months of service) with an individual target percentage of 75% of base salary; (iii) continued participation in the terms of the Transition AgreementCompany’s Long-Term Incentive Program but at a reduced level for the term that commenced June 2, 2015three-year performance period commencing in 2019 to reflect his planned departure in March 2020.
If Mr. Tucker stays employed until March 31, 2020 and concluded December 31, 2015 (the “Transition Term”),(a) has successfully performed the duties specified in exchange for assisting with the transitionRetention Agreement and (b) executes a general release of all claims against the Company: (i) paid and will continue to pay Mr. Seymour his regular base salary per bi-weekly pay period, less required withholding and other required deductions, for fifteen (15) pay periods; and (ii) continued Mr. Seymour’s enrollment in the Company’s insurance benefits through December 31, 2015. Mr. Seymour was not eligible forCompany, any incentive pay under the Company’s Short-term Incentive Plan, vacation accrual or pay, bonus or other form of compensation in relation to the services he performs during the Transition Term.
In addition, the Company: (i) amended the 17,033 time-based shares granted to Mr. Seymour on November 22, 2013 under the Company’s Long-term Incentive Plan (“2013 LTIP”) that were scheduled to vest on November 22, 2016 so as to accelerate the vesting to the effective date of the Transition Agreement; and (ii) vested the 63,875 performance-based shares granted under the Company’s 2013 LTIP on November 22, 2013 on schedule and according to actual performance achieved as determined by the Company’s Board or the Organization & Compensation Committee as a result of Mr. Seymour re-executing his agreement in January 2016. Mr. Seymour will forfeit all of his other unvested equity awards including but not limited to grants made on April 7, 2014 and March 30, 2015, and will be treated as retired for the purpose of any options that already vested on June 1, 2015.vested.
The Transition Agreement also provides that for a period of eighteen (18) months followingIf Mr. Seymour’s retirement date, he will not: (i) solicit or encourage any employee or consultant of the Company or any of its parent, subsidiary, or affiliated entities to terminate his/her employment or contractual relationship or accept any other employment; or (ii) provide any information regarding any employee or consultant of the Company or any of its parent, subsidiary, or affiliated entities, and any predecessor thereto, to any person, including, but not limited to, recruiters and prospective employers. In addition, for the Transition Term, Mr. Seymour will not compete with the business of the Company or any of its parent, subsidiary, or affiliated entities, directly or indirectly, including, without limitation, managing, being employed by, controlling, or operating any competing business.
Other
The Aerojet Rocketdyne Foundation matches all employee and Director gifts to accredited, non-profit colleges, universities, secondary and elementary public or private schools located in the United States. Gifts made are matched dollar for dollar up to $3,000 per calendar year per donor.
As part of an employment offer, the Company paid a hiring bonus of $75,000 to Mr. Schumacher upon the commencement of his employment on April 29, 2013. The bonus was conditioned upon Mr. Schumacher’s acceptance of the employment offer andTucker’s employment with the Company for a periodends prior to March 31, 2020 due to his death or disability or because of one year. In the event Mr. Schumacher had voluntarily terminated his employment with the Company or was terminatedinvoluntary termination other than for cause, within(i) base salary for the one-year period Mr. Schumacher agreed to reimburse the Company within 30 days of termination. The restriction period on this hiring bonus has lapsed.
Impact of Accounting Guidance for Stock Compensation
The accounting standards applicable to stock compensation is one factor that the Company and the Organization & Compensation Committee consider in the design of its long-term equity incentive programs. Other factors include the link to the performance that each vehicle provides, the degree of upside leverage and downside risk inherent in each vehicle, the impact on dilution and overhang that the vehicles have, and the role that each vehicle has in the attraction, retention, and motivation of our executive and key employee talent. The Company monitors its stock compensation expense to ensure that it is reasonable, but expensefrom his termination date until March 31, 2020 will not be the most important factor in making decisions about our long-term incentive plans.
Tax Deductibility under Section 162(m)
Section 162(m) of the Code limits the amount of compensation paid to our CEOhim in a lump sum; (ii) a prorata STIP award will be paid at the same time STIP payments are made to other employees; and our other three most highly compensated executive officers, other than our CFO, that may(iii) vesting of unvested equity awards will be deducted by us for federal income tax purposes inaccelerated (on a prorata basis if termination of employment is due to death or disability).



3744



any fiscal year to $1,000,000. “Performance-based” compensation that has been approved by our stockholders and otherwise satisfies the performance-based requirements under Section 162(m) of the Code is not subject to the Code’s $1,000,000 deduction limit. While the Organization & Compensation Committee believes that it is important for compensation paid to our named executive officers to be tax deductible under the Code, the Organization & Compensation Committee also recognizes the need to retain flexibility to make compensation decisions that may not meet the standards of Section 162(m) when it determines is necessary or appropriate to enable the Company to continue to attract, retain, reward and motivate its highly qualified executives. Therefore, we reserve the right to design programs that recognize a full range of performance criteria important to our success, even where the compensation paid under such programs may not be deductible.
Employee Compensation Policies Relating to Risk Management
The Organization & Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s compensation policies and practices are structured to discourage inappropriate risk taking by our executives and that none of the Company’s compensation policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company believes that its compensation plans effectively balance risk and reward and are generally uniform in design and operation throughout the Company.
Limited Government Reimbursement of Compensation
As a government contractor, the Company is subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which limits the reimbursement of costs by our government customers for senior executive compensation to a benchmark compensation cap established each year. The cap applies to the five most highly compensated executives per segment of the Company. Any amounts over the cap are considered unallowable and, therefore, not billed to the government.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES
38


2018 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth information regarding compensation for each of the named executive officersNEOs for fiscal years 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013.
2016.
Name and Principal PositionYear
Salary(1)
Bonus
Stock Awards(2)
Options/SARs
Awards(2)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(3)
All Other Compensation(4)
Total
Executive Officers as of November 30, 2015
Eileen P. Drake(7)
         
CEO and President2015$477,695
$200,000
(5) 
$3,916,338
(6) 
$241,662
$574,587
$76,585
$5,486,867
Kathleen E. Redd2015414,289
200,000
  418,340
(6) 
269,603
289,512
11,925
1,603,669
Vice President, CFO and Assistant Secretary2014390,294
—
  482,731
   
—
242,711
11,700
1,127,436
2013381,028
—
  955,699
   
—
259,259
11,475
1,607,461
Mark A. Tucker (8)
          
Chief Operating Officer2015384,341
—
 264,614
(6) 
170,523
256,536
10,921
1,086,935
 John D. Schumacher (9)
2015322,421
105,000
  243,929
(6) 
157,199
191,237
23,532
1,043,318
Vice President, Washington Operations2014302,217
—
  300,015
   
—
172,013
15,738
789,983
2013178,846
75,000
 240,017
   
152,564
104,950
6,750
758,127
 Christopher C. Cambria2015339,619
—
  286,941
(6) 
184,925
138,969
11,664
962,118
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary2014327,285
—
  326,472
   
—
168,952
11,700
834,409
2013323,117
—
 222,004
 —
217,548
15,180
777,849
Former Executive Officers as of November 30, 2015
Scott J. Seymour2015$744,712
$—
 $—
 $117,116
$—
$14,925
$876,753
President and CEO2014682,597
—
 1,440,041
 —
906,250
11,700
3,040,588
 2013626,936
—
 1,203,229
 —
1,082,194
14,475
2,926,834
Name and Principal PositionPeriod
Salary(1)
Bonus
Stock Awards(2)
Options/SARs
Awards(2)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(3)
All Other Compensation(4)
Total
Eileen P. Drake2018$805,788
$—
 $2,714,218
(5) 
$412,494
 $1,589,775
$12,375
$5,534,650
Chief Executive Officer and President2017721,538
—
 1,091,999
 501,131
 1,222,312
24,224
3,561,204
2016702,692
—
 1,049,998
 501,060
 951,673
40,229
3,245,652
            
Mark A. Tucker2018470,067
—
 1,129,627
(6) 
177,159
 682,798
12,375
2,472,026
Chief Operating Officer2017450,240
—
 459,963
 211,072
 495,770
11,532
1,628,577
2016434,538
—
 409,503
 195,415
 421,589
11,925
1,472,970
            
Paul R. Lundstrom(7)
2018458,299
—
 748,207
(8) 
172,731
 665,705
12,375
2,057,317
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer2017439,923
—
 448,453
 205,790
 483,359
29,520
1,607,045
201666,154
100,000
 656,400
 —
 59,762
359,599
1,241,915
            
John D. Schumacher2018369,472
—
 344,664
(9) 
93,219
 467,087
30,782
1,305,224
Senior Vice President, Washington Operations2017348,678
—
 263,864
 121,087
 324,870
14,750
1,073,249
           
            
Arjun L. Kampani(10)
2018357,591
—
 336,216
(11) 
90,414
 452,997
12,375
1,249,593
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary2017335,000
—
 253,516
 116,333
 312,126
12,150
1,029,125
2016237,500
100,000
 872,156
 117,563
 263,656
92,874
1,683,749
            
(1)The amount reported in this column reflects the dollar amount of base salary earned in each listed fiscal year.period.
(2)
The amountamounts reported in this column representsthese columns represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted in each of the three yearsperiods presented. The grant date fair value of stock awards is computed in accordance with GAAP excluding the effect of estimated forfeituresforfeitures. The grant date fair value for service-based and performance-based stock awards is equal to the closing price of our stock on the date of grant times the number of shares awarded and in the case of performance grants, adjusted for the probable outcome of achieving performance metrics.metrics for performance-based awards. The grant date fair value of stock price performance-based stock awards was estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation given that these awards contain market-based vesting conditions. The grant date fair value of stock options and SARs awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes Model. A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating these values may be found in Note 10(d)9(d) in the audited financial statements in the Company’s 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2015.Report. A description of these awards can be found under the section entitled Long-Term Incentives (Equity-Based Compensation)Equity Incentive Awards on page 32.36.
(3)
The amount reported in this column reflects annual cash incentive compensation, which is based on performance in each listed fiscal year.period. This annual incentive compensation is discussed further under the section entitled Short-termAnnual Cash Incentive ProgramAwards on page 30.34.
(4)The amountsamount reported in this column includeincludes the following for fiscal 2015:2018:
Name
Company
Matching
Contribution to
401(k) Plan
Company
Matching
Contribution to
Benefits
Restoration
Plan-
Savings Plan
Matching Gift
by the Aerojet Rocketdyne
Foundation
Perquisites
And Other
Personal
Benefits(A)
Total
Executive Officers as of November 30, 2015
Eileen P. Drake$11,123
$—
$—
$65,462
$76,585
Kathleen E. Redd11,925
—
—
—
11,925
Mark A. Tucker10,921
—
—
—
10,921
John D. Schumacher11,925
9,007
2,600
—
23,532
Christopher C. Cambria11,664
—
—
—
11,664
Former Executive Officers as of November 30, 2015
Scott J. Seymour11,925
—
3,000
—
14,925
Name
Company
Matching
Contribution to
401(k) Plan
Company
Matching
Contribution to
Benefits
Restoration
Plan-
Savings Plan
Matching Gift
by the Aerojet Rocketdyne
Foundation
Perquisites
And Other
Personal
Benefits
Total
Eileen P. Drake$12,375
$—
$—
$—
$12,375
Mark A. Tucker12,375
—
—
—
12,375
Paul R. Lundstrom12,375
—
—
—
12,375
John D. Schumacher12,375
17,407
1,000
—
30,782
Arjun L. Kampani12,375
—
—
—
12,375

(A) This column includes items paid by the Company or reimbursed to the employee for relocation expenses.
45


39


(5)
Ms. Drake receivedDrake’s stock awards compensation consists of $299,995 for a one-time bonus of $200,000 per the employment agreement entered into on November 23, 2015. A further description of the agreement can be found on page 35 under the section entitled Employment Agreement, Transition Agreement and Plan Provisions.
(6)The amounts reportedservice-based restricted stock grant, $900,146 for fiscal 2015 Stock Awards consist ofa stock price performance-based restricted stock grant, $276,600 incremental fair value for a performance-based restricted stock grant that vests based on revenue, EBITDAP, ROIC, cumulative CIP Phase I investments,was modified and cumulative Phase I savings metrics$1,237,477 for fiscal 2017 (“Performance Grant A”). Ms. Drake’s amount reported for fiscal 2015 Stock Awards also contains a second performance-based restricted stock grant that vests based on environmental remediation reimbursement advancement agreements, competitive improvement program restructuring execution, and AR1 program achievement (“Performance Grant B”) and service-based grants.grant. The grant date fair value of the performance-based and service-based grants based on the current estimated vesting of 100% and the value of the performance-basedrestricted stock grant at the maximum vesting of 200% vesting is as follows:would be $2,474,954.
NameGrant Date Fair Value of Performance-Based and Service-Based Grants at 100% Target VestingGrant Date Fair Value of Performance-Based Grant at 200% Maximum Vesting
Eileen P. Drake Service-Based Grants1,627,359
N/A
Eileen P. Drake Performance Grant A374,979
$749,957
Eileen P. Drake Performance Grant B1,914,000
N/A
Eileen P. Drake Total3,916,338
N/A
Kathleen E. Redd418,340
836,682
Mark A. Tucker264,614
529,227
John D. Schumacher243,929
487,857
Christopher C. Cambria286,941
573,881

(6)Mr. Tucker’s stock awards compensation consists of $172,523 for a stock price performance-based restricted stock grant. Also included is $62,532 for a service-based restricted stock grant and $894,572 for a performance-based restricted stock grant which was modified due to the Retention Agreement discussed on page 44. The Retention Agreement essentially modifies the performance-based award to a service-based award as the agreement guarantees the vesting of two-thirds of the grant regardless of what performance metrics are met.
(7)Ms. DrakeMr. Lundstrom commenced herhis employment with the Company on March 2, 2015.November 7, 2016.
(8)Mr. Tucker was appointed COO on June 25, 2015.Lundstrom’s stock awards compensation consists of $57,498 for a service-based restricted stock grant, $172,523 for a stock price performance-based restricted stock grant and $518,186 for a performance-based restricted stock grant. The grant date fair value of the performance-based restricted stock grant at the maximum vesting of 200% would be $1,036,372.
(9)Mr. SchumacherSchumacher’s stock awards compensation consists of $16,241 for a service-based restricted stock grant, $48,756 for a stock price performance-based restricted stock grant and $279,667 for a performance-based restricted stock grant. The grant date fair value of the performance-based restricted stock grant at the maximum vesting of 200% would be $559,334.
(10)Mr. Kampani commenced his employment with the Company on April 29, 2013.11, 2016.
(11)Mr. Kampani’s stock awards compensation consists of $16,241 for a service-based restricted stock grant, $48,756 for a stock price performance-based restricted stock grant and $271,219 for a performance-based restricted stock grant. The grant date fair value of the performance-based restricted stock grant at the maximum vesting of 200% would be $542,439.




4046



2015
2018 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
The following table provides information for each of the named executive officersNEOs for fiscal 20152018 annual and long-term incentive award opportunities, including the range of possible payments under non-equity incentive plans.
Name
Grant
Date
Estimated Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards ($) (1)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards (#)
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or
Units (#)
All
Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (#)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Options/SARs
($/Sh)
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option/SARs
Awards ($)
Grant
Date
Estimated Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards ($) (1)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards (#)
Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)
All
Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (#)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Options/SARs
($/Sh)
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option/SARs
Awards ($)
Threshold (2)
TargetMaximumThresholdTargetMaximum
Threshold (2)
TargetMaximumThresholdTargetMaximum
Executive Officers as of November 30, 2015
Eileen P. Drake           
Annual Incentive Award $—
$537,500
$1,007,813
     $—
$825,000
$1,650,000
   
Restricted Stock03/02/2015 

25,667


$499,993
 02/27/2018 22,706
45,412
90,824
  $1,237,477
(3) 
Restricted Stock03/02/2015 

57,873


1,127,366
 02/27/2018  48,205
  900,146
(4) 
Restricted Stock03/30/2015 8,131
16,261
32,522



374,979
(3) 
02/27/2018  11,009
  299,995
 
Restricted Stock Modification10/27/2018   276,600
 
SARs02/27/2018  46,768
$27.25
412,494
(5) 
     
Mark A. Tucker     
Annual Incentive Award —
307,088
614,176
   
Restricted Stock11/18/2015 
120,000




1,914,000
(5) 
02/27/2018 9,752
19,504
39,008

  531,484
(6) 
Stock Options03/30/2015  
17,848
$23.06
241,662
 
Kathleen E. Redd     
  
Restricted Stock Modification12/06/2018   363,088
(6) 
Restricted Stock02/27/2018  9,239
  172,523
(4) 
Restricted Stock02/27/2018  2,110
  62,532
 
SARs02/27/2018  20,086
27.25
177,159
(5) 
     
Paul R. Lundstrom     
Annual Incentive Award —
270,825
507,797
   
  
 —
299,400
598,801
   
Restricted Stock03/30/2015 8,469
16,938
33,876


390,590
(3) 
02/27/2018 9,508
19,016
38,032
  518,186
(3) 
Restricted Stock04/17/2015 678
1,355
2,710




27,750
(4) 
02/27/2018  9,239
  172,523
(4) 
Stock Options03/30/2015 



18,591
23.06
251,722
 
Stock Options04/17/2015 



1,487
20.48
17,881
 
Mark A. Tucker      
Annual Incentive Award —
252,000
472,501
    
Restricted Stock03/30/2015 5,738
11,475
22,950
  264,614
(3) 
02/27/2018  2,110
  57,498
 
Stock Options03/30/2015   12,594
23.06
170,523

SARs02/27/2018  19,584
27.25
172,731
(5) 
     
John D. Schumacher     
  
     
Annual Incentive Award —
178,893
335,424
   
  
 —
242,391
484,782
   
Restricted Stock03/30/2015 5,289
10,578
21,156
   243,929
(3) 
02/27/2018 5,132
10,263
20,526
  279,667
(3) 
Stock Options03/30/2015  
 
 11,610
23.06
157,199

Christopher C. Cambria     
  
Restricted Stock02/27/2018  2,611
  48,756
(4) 
Restricted Stock02/27/2018  596
  16,241
 
SARs02/27/2018  10,569
27.25
93,219
(5) 
     
Arjun L. Kampani     
Annual Incentive Award —
193,280
362,401
     —
235,079
470,158
   
Restricted Stock03/30/2015 5,715
11,429
22,858
  263,553
(3) 
02/27/2018 4,977
9,953
19,906
  271,219
(3) 
Restricted Stock04/17/2015 571
1,142
2,284
  23,388
(4) 
02/27/2018  2,611
  48,756
(4) 
Stock Options03/30/2015   12,544
23.06
169,846
 
Stock Options04/17/2015   1,254
20.48
15,079
 
Former Executive Officers as of November 30, 2015
Scott J. Seymour      
Stock options Modification01/06/2010   7,135
(6) 
Stock options Modification11/30/2010   762
(6) 
Stock options Modification03/30/2011   11,494
(6) 
Stock options Modification02/05/2014    97,725
(6) 
Restricted Stock02/27/2018  596
  16,241
 
SARs02/27/2018  10,251
27.25
90,414
(5) 
(1)
Reflects the possible payout amounts of non-equity incentive plan awards that could have been earned in fiscal 2015.2018. See the 2018 Summary Compensation Table on page 3945 for the amounts actually earned in fiscal 20152018 and paid out in the first quarter of fiscal 2016.2019.
(2)If all financial metrics are not met at the threshold level, the annual incentive award will not be earned.
(3)Vesting of this performance-based restricted stock grant is based on financialrevenue, adjusted EBITDAP, and ROIC performance metrics for fiscal 2017.a three-year performance period ending on the last day of 2020. The grant date fair value at the maximum of 200% vesting would be $749,957$2,474,954 for Ms. Drake, $781,181 for Ms. Redd, $527,105$1,036,372 for Mr. Cambria, $487,857Lundstrom, $559,334 for Mr. Schumacher and $529,227$542,439 for Mr. Tucker.Kampani.
(4)Vesting of this stock price performance-based restricted stock grant is based on financial performance for fiscal 2017. The grant date fair value atas follows: 1/3 upon attainment of a share price of $34 no later than December 31, 2020; an additional 1/3 upon attainment of a share price of $38 no later than December 31, 2021; and the maximumfinal 1/3 upon the attainment of 200% vesting would be $55,501 for Ms. Redd and $46,776 for Mr. Cambria.a share price of $42 no later than December 31, 2022.

47



(5)VestingThe fair value of this performance-based restricted stockthese SAR grants were estimated using the Black-Scholes Model with the following weighted average assumptions at the grant is based on environmental remediation reimbursement advancement agreements, competitive improvement program restructuring execution, and AR1 program achievement with a vesting year term of fiscal 2015 through fiscal 2018. A portion of the AR1 program achievement was attained and 20,000 shares of this grant vested on December 25, 2015.date: expected life - five years; volatility - 31.32%; risk-free interest rate - 2.67%; dividend yield - not applicable.
(6)These stock option grants were modified pursuantThis award was originally granted as a performance-based award with a maximum of 39,008 shares. The Retention Agreement discussed on page 44 essentially modifies this award to a service-based award as the Transition Agreement wherein Mr. Seymour has retired. Therefore his vested stock options remain exercisable untilagreement guarantees the endvesting of their ten year life.two-thirds of the grant on March 31, 2020, regardless of what performance metrics are met.


4148



OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2015 FISCAL
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2018 YEAR END
The following table provides information for each of the named executive officersNEOs regarding outstanding stock options, SARs and stock awards held by the officers as of November 30, 2015.December 31, 2018.
NameOption/SARs AwardsStock AwardsOption/SARs Awards Stock Awards
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options/SARs
(#)
Exercisable
    Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Unexercised
    Options/SARs
    (#)
    Unexercisable
    Equity
    Incentive
    Plan Awards:
    Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Unexercised
    Unearned
    Option/SARs
    (#)
Option/
SARs
Exercise
Price
($)
Option/
SARs
Expiration
Year
Service-Based Equity
Awards
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options/SARs
(#)
Exercisable
    Number of
    Securities
    Underlying
    Unexercised
    Options/SARs
    (#)
    Unexercisable
Option/
SARs
Exercise
Price
($)
Option/
SARs
Expiration
Year
 
Service-Based Equity
Awards
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)(1)
    Number of
    Unearned
    Shares, Units
    or Other
    Rights That
    Have Not
    Vested
    (#)
    Market or
    Payout Value
    of Unearned
    Shares,
Units
    or Other
    Rights That
    Have Not
    Vested
    ($)(1)
    Number of
    Shares or
    Units of
    Stock That
    Have Not
    Vested
    (#)
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)(1)
    Number of
    Unearned
    Shares, Units
    or Other
    Rights That
    Have Not
    Vested
    (#)
    Market or
    Payout Value
    of Unearned
    Shares,
Units
    or Other
    Rights That
    Have Not
    Vested
    ($)(1)
Executive Officers as of November 30, 2015
Eileen P. Drake                       
Restricted Stock      —

$—
120,000
(2) 
$2,104,800
    —
 $—
90,824
(2) 
$3,199,730
     —

—
16,261
(3) 
285,218
     57,873
(4) 
1,015,092
—

—
     25,667
(5) 
450,199
—

—
Stock Options —
17,848
(12 
) 
—
$23.06
2022      
Kathleen E. Redd       
  
  
  
 
Restricted Stock      —

—
1,355
(3) 
23,767
    —
 —
32,137
(3) 
1,132,187
     —
  
—
16,938
(3) 
297,093
     6,988
(6) 
122,570
—

—
     —

—
20,964
(7) 
367,709
     6,451
(8) 
113,151
—
  
—
     —

—
12,096
(9) 
212,164
     36,523
(10) 
640,613
—

—
Restricted Stock     —
 —
97,718
(4) 
3,442,605
Restricted Stock     —
 —
131,414
(5) 
4,629,715
Restricted Stock     —
 —
20,000
(6) 
704,600
Restricted Stock     11,009
(7) 
387,847
—
 —
SARs—
46,768
(8) 
$27.25
2025       
SARs—
53,028
(9) 
22.35
2024       
SARs 20,000
—


—
4.25
2018 
  
  
  
 —
68,189
(10) 
15.98
2023       
Stock Options —
1,487
(11 
) 
—
20.48
2022 
  
  
  
 17,848
—
 23.06
2022       
—
18,591
(12 
) 
—
23.06
2022 
  
  
  
           
5,612
—


—
16.59
2021      
1,750
—


—
6.00
2019 
  
  
  
 
22,449
—


—
6.01
2018      
64,555
—


—
4.91
2017      
35,000
—


—
4.54
2019 
  
  
  
 
Mark A. Tucker                     
Restricted Stock      —

—
11,475
(3) 
201,272
    —
 —
26,005
(11) 
916,156
      4,777
(6) 
83,789
—

—
      —

—
14,331
(7) 
251,366
      5,833
(14) 
102,311
—

—
Stock Options—
12,594
(12 
) 
—
23.06
2022      
John D. Schumacher       
  
  
  
 
Restricted Stock      —

—
10,578
(3) 
185,538
    —
 —
6,160
(3) 
217,017
     4,343
(6) 
76,176
—

—
     —

—
13,029
(7) 
228,529
     3,398
(8) 
59,601
—

—
     —
  
—
6,371
(9) 
111,747
Restricted Stock    —
 —
41,159
(4) 
1,450,032
Restricted Stock    —
 —
51,252
(5) 
1,805,608
Restricted Stock    2,110
(7) 
74,335
—
 —
SARs 13,333
6,667
(13) 
—
13.01
2020 
  
  
  
 —
20,086
(8) 
27.25
2025       
Stock Options—
11,610
(12) 
—
23.06
2022      
Christopher C. Cambria       
  
  
  
 
Restricted Stock      —

—
1,142
(3) 
20,031
     —

—
11,429
(3) 
200,465
     4,726
(6) 
82,894
—

—
     —
  
—
14,178
(7) 
248,682
     3,143
(8) 
55,128
—
  
—
     —
  
—
5,893
(9) 
103,363
SARs—
22,335
(9) 
22.35
2024       
SARs 20,000
—


—
4.00
2018 
  
  
  
 —
26,594
(10) 
15.98
2023       
Stock Options—
12,544
(12 
) 
—
23.06
2022      12,594
—
 23.06
2022       
—
1,254
(11 
) 
—
20.48
2022                
Former Executive Officers as of November 30, 2015
Scott J. Seymour           
Paul R. Lundstrom          
Restricted Stock     —

$—
31,938
(9) 
$560,193
    —
 —
38,032
(2) 
1,339,867
Restricted Stock    —
 —
6,160
(3) 
217,017
Restricted Stock    —
 —
40,129
(4) 
1,413,745
Restricted Stock    2,110
(7) 
74,335
—
 —
Restricted Stock    13,333
(12) 
469,722
—
 —
SARs—
19,584
(8) 
27.25
2025       
SARs—
21,776
(9) 
22.35
2024       
          
John D. Schumacher          
Restricted Stock    —
 —
20,526
(2) 
723,131
Restricted Stock    —
 —
1,741
(3) 
61,335
Restricted Stock    —
 —
23,611
(4) 
831,816
Restricted Stock    —
 —
31,753
(5) 
1,118,658
Restricted Stock    596
(7) 
20,997
—
 —
SARs—
10,569
(8) 
27.25
2025       
SARs—
12,813
(9) 
22.35
2024       
SARs—
16,476
(10) 
15.98
2023       
SARs20,000
—
 13.01
2020       
Stock Options16,405
—

—
$16.59
2021      11,610
—
 23.06
2022       
65,621
—

—
6.01
2018                
100,000
—

—
7.14
2017      
Arjun L. Kampani          
Restricted Stock    —
 —
19,906
(2) 
701,288
Restricted Stock    —
 —
1,741
(3) 
61,335
Restricted Stock    —
 —
22,685
(4) 
799,193
Restricted Stock    —
 —
31,031
(5) 
1,093,222
Restricted Stock    596
(7) 
20,997
—
 —
Restricted Stock    13,333
(13) 
469,722
—
 —
SARs—
10,251
(8) 
27.25
2025       
SARs—
12,310
(9) 
22.35
2024       
SARs—
16,274
(14) 
15.71
2023       

4249



(1)The market value was calculated by multiplying the number of shares by the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock of $17.54$35.23 on November 30, 2015.December 31, 2018.
(2)These shares will vest when the individual performance goals are met, if met before November 18, 2018. A portion of the AR1 program achievement was attained and 20,000 shares of this grant vested on December 25, 2015.
(3)The vesting date for these performance-based restricted stock awards is on or about January 31, 2018,February 28, 2021, subject to approval by the Organization & Compensation Committee. These awards will only vest if performance targets are met through November 30, 2017.December 31, 2020.
(3)One-third of this grant vested upon attainment of a share price of $34 on August 17, 2018. Of the remaining two-thirds of this grant outstanding on December 31, 2018, an additional one-third of this grant vested upon attainment of a share price of $38 on February 5, 2019 and the final one-third of the remaining shares will vest upon the attainment of a share price of $42 no later than December 31, 2022.
(4)This service-based restricted stock award vests in 50% increments on January 3, 2016 and January 3, 2017.
(5)The vesting date for this service-based restricted stock award is March 2, 2018.
(6)The vesting date for these service-based restricted stock awards is April 7, 2017.
(7)The vesting date for these performance-based restricted stock awards is on or about January 31, 2017,February 28, 2020, subject to approval by the Organization & Compensation Committee. These awards will only vest if performance targets are met through December 31, 2019.
(5)The vesting date for these performance-based restricted stock awards was February 28, 2019. Performance targets were met through December 31, 2018, resulting in grants vesting at 174.6%.
(6)These shares will vest when the individual performance goals are met, if met before November 30, 2016.18, 2020.
(7)This award vests in one-third increments on February 27th of each year, becoming fully vested in 2021.
(8)The vesting date for these service-based restricted stockSARs awards is November 22, 2016.February 27, 2021.
(9)The vesting date for these performance-based restricted stockservice-based SARs awards was February 18, 2016. EVA Performance targets were not met through November 30, 2015 resulting in EVA grants not vesting. Corporate financial targets were met through November 30, 2015 resulting in grants vesting at 66.8%. As a result, the named executive officers did not have any shares vest from this grant.is May 1, 2020.
(10)The vesting date for thisthese service-based restricted stock award for Ms. ReddSARs awards is May 9, 2016.April 5, 2019.
(11)TheseThis award was originally granted as a performance-based award with a maximum vesting of 39,008 shares. The Retention Agreement discussed on page 44 essentially modifies this award to a service-based stock options vest in one-third incrementsaward as the agreement guarantees the vesting of two-thirds of the grant on April 17th each year, becoming fully vested in 2018.March 31, 2020 regardless of what performance metrics are met.
(12)These service-based stock options vest in one-third increments on March 30th each year, becoming fully vested in 2018.
(13)Mr. Schumacher’s unvested SARs vest in one-third increments on April 29th each year, becoming fully vested in 2016.
(14)Mr. Tucker’sLundstrom’s service-based restricted stock award vests in one-third increments on OctoberNovember 7th each year, becoming fully vested in 2016.2019.
(13)Mr. Kampani’s service-based restricted stock award vests in one-third increments on April 11th each year, becoming fully vested in 2019.
(14)Mr. Kampani’s service-based SARs award will vest on April 11, 2019.
2015
2018 OPTION/SAR EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
The following table provides information for each of the named executive officersNEOs regarding stock option and SARs exercises and stock award vestings during fiscal 2015.
2018.
NameOption/SARs AwardsStock AwardsOption/SARs Awards Stock Awards
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)(1)
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)(2)
Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)(3)
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)(1)
 
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)(2)
Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)(3)
Executive Officers as of November 30, 2015
Eileen P. Drake—
$—
—
 $—
—
$—
 82,519
 $2,505,904
Kathleen E. Redd6,560
34,888
51,966
 964,597
Mark A. Tucker—
—
19,875
 344,717
—
—
 17,746
 510,058
Paul R. Lundstrom—
—
 16,412
 625,969
John D. Schumacher—
—
—
  —
—
—
 14,390
 399,610
Christopher C. Cambria—
—
32,386
  601,152
Former Executive Officers as of November 30, 2015
Scott J. Seymour188,697
$3,547,504
160,682
 $3,019,523
Arjun L. Kampani—
—
 14,203
 417,580
(1)
The value realized on vesting represents the difference between the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the exercise date and the exercise price multiplied by the number of shares underlying each option exercised.
(2)The amounts reported in this column reflect restricted stock awards that vested during fiscal 2015.2018.
(3)The value realized on vesting is calculated by multiplying the number of shares vested by the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the vesting date.


4350



2015 PENSION BENEFITS
2018 Pension Benefits
The Company’s defined benefit pension and BRPplans are frozen and no longer accruing benefits. Effective February 1, 2009 and July 31, 2009, future benefit accruals for all non-collective bargaining-unit employees, including the named executive officersNEOs and collective bargaining-unit employees respectively, were discontinued. Also, Effective November 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014, the Company discontinued benefit accruals for certain Rocketdyne’s bargaining unitRocketdyne bargaining-unit employees. The remaining Rocketdyne bargaining-unit employees benefit accruals were discontinued effective April 1, 2016. No employees lost their previously earned pension benefits.
Qualified Pension Plan
The Qualified Pension Plan is a tax-qualified defined benefit plan covering substantially all collective bargaining-unit and non-collective bargaining-unit employees hired before the freeze date. In general, normal retirement age is 65, with certain plan provisions allowing for earlier retirement. Before the freeze date, pension benefits were calculated under formulas based on compensation and length of service for salaried employees and under negotiated non-wage based formulas for bargaining-unit and hourly employees. Participants will receive the highest benefit calculated under any of the formulas for which they were eligible to participate through the freeze date.
2009 Pension BRP Plan
Total pension benefits for the named executive officers and certain other highly compensated employees were determined under a combination of the 2009 Pension BRP Plan, which is a non-qualified plan, and the Qualified Pension Plan. As set forth above, the Qualified Pension Plan is a qualified pension plan that provides pension benefits for employees, the amount of which is limited under Section 401(a)(17) or 415 of the Code (or any successor provisions). The 2009 Pension BRP Plan restored the pension plan benefits which executives and their beneficiaries would otherwise lose as a result of the limitations under Section 401(a)(17) or 415 of the Code (or any successor provisions). Eligibility to participate in the 2009 Pension BRP Plan was designated by the Organization & Compensation Committee.
The following table provides information regarding the actuarial present values of accumulated benefits under the Qualified Pension Plan and the 2009 Pension BRP Plan of the named executive officersNEOs who were eligible for pension benefits prior to the freeze date of the plans as of November 30, 2015.December 31, 2018. Ms. Drake, and Messrs. Cambria, SeymourTucker, Lundstrom and TuckerKampani are not participants in either of the pension plans as their employment with the Company commenced after the freeze date.
NamePlan Name
  Number of Years       
  Credited Service       
  (#)(1)       
  Present Value    
  of Accumulated    
  Benefit    
  ($)(2)    
  Payments    
  During Fiscal    
  2015    
  ($)    
Plan Name
  Number of Years       
  Credited Service       
  (#)(1)       
  Present Value    
  of Accumulated    
  Benefit    
  ($)(2)    
  Payments    
  During     
  2018    
  ($)    
Kathleen E. ReddQualified Pension Plan   6.50$305,831
$      —
2009 Pension BRP Plan 6.5081,458
—
John D. Schumacher(3)
Qualified Pension Plan   2.58149,008
—
Qualified Pension Plan   2.58$146,221
$—
2009 Pension BRP Plan 2.589,207
—
2009 Pension BRP Plan 2.588,986
—
(1)Credited service under the Qualified Pension Plan and the 2009 Pension BRP Plan is determined for all participants in accordance with such plans and is through February 1, 2009, the freeze date for these plans in which the Company discontinued future benefit accruals for all non-collective bargaining-unit employees, including the named executive officers.NEOs. This number is being presented unrounded.
(2)The amounts reported in this column were calculated based on the accrued benefit as of February 1, 2009, the date benefit accruals were frozen for non-collective bargaining-unit employees. Present values were calculated assuming no pre-retirement mortality or termination. The values under the Qualified Pension Plan and the 2009 Pension BRP Plan are the actuarial present values as of November 30, 2015December 31, 2018, of the benefits earned as of the freeze date and payable at the earliest age eligible for unreduced benefits for the Qualified Pension Plan (the earlier of age 65, or age 62 with 10 years of service) and the current benefit election date on record for the 2009 Pension BRP Plan. The change in the present values this year compared to last year is primarily the result of an increase in the discount rate due to higher market interest rates used to determine the Company’s pension obligation.
The discount rate assumption is 4.26%4.27% for the Qualified Pension Plan and 4.32% for the 2009 Pension BRP Plan. The mortality assumption of the two pension plans is RP 2014 with no collar projected back to 20112006 with Scale MP-2014 then forward generationally using a customized Scale MP-2014.MP-2018. The assumptions reflected in this footnote are the same as the ones used for the Qualified

44


Pension Plan and the 2009 Pension BRP Plan for financial reporting purposes with the exception of assumed retirement age and the absence of pre-retirement mortality and termination assumptions.
(3)Mr. Schumacher’s pension benefits were earned from his previous employment with the Company beginning June 12, 2006 through the pension freeze date for non-collective bargaining-unit employees of February 1, 2009. He has not accrued any additional benefit for his current employment with the Company that began on April 29, 2013.
2015 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
51



2018 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Benefits Restoration Plan — 2009 401(k) BRP Plan
The 2009 401(k) BRP Plan is a non-qualified, unfunded savings plan designed to enable participants to defer their compensation on a pre-tax basis. Under the 2009 401(k) BRP Plan, a select group of employees approved by the Organization & Compensation Committee,VP, CHRO, elect to defer compensation earned in the current year such as salary and certain other incentive compensation that would otherwise be paid in the current year. Effective January 1, 2009, obligations with respect to benefits that were earned or vested under the Prior Pensionprior 401(k) BRP Plan after December 31, 2004, and were related to the restoration of 401(k) benefits which such employees and their beneficiaries would otherwise have lost as a result of Code limitations upon accrual and/or payment of benefits from the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement401(k) Savings Plan, along with all associated earnings, were transferred to, and will be maintained under and paid from the 2009 401(k) BRP Plan. Accordingly, only benefits that are exempt from Section 409A of the Code will be maintained under and paid from the Prior Pensionprior 401(k) BRP plan in accordance with the terms of the Prior Pension BRP.prior 401(k) BRP plan.
The Company matchesmay match 401(k) BRP employee contributions in an amount equal to 100%the extent that after the end of any plan year, any additional Company matching contributions that would have been made on the participant’s contribution upbehalf under the Savings Plan during the plan year if: (i) the compensation deferral percentage elected under the 401(k) BRP Plan for the plan year had been applied under the Savings Plan; and (ii) the participant’s contributions under the Savings Plan were not limited by the Code limitations applicable to the first 3% of the participant’s eligible compensation and 50% up to the next 3% of the participant’s eligible compensation if the participant has reached the 402(g) limit in the 401(k) Savings Plan. The maximum company match is 4.5%. Participants indicate how they wish their deferred compensation and the companyCompany matching contributions to be notionally invested among the same investment options available through the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement401(k) Savings Plan. Non-qualified benefits may be paid out of either the grantor trust (pre-funded) or the Company’s general assets.
The following table provides information for each of the named executive officersNEOs regarding aggregate officer and Company contributions and aggregate earnings for fiscal 20152018 and fiscal year-end account balances under the 2009 401(k) BRP Plan.
Name
Executive
Contributions in
fiscal 2015
($)(1)
Company
Contributions in
fiscal 2015
($)(2)
Aggregate
Earnings in
fiscal 2015
($)(3)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
Aggregate
Balance at
November 30,
2015
($)
Executive Officers as of November 30, 2015
Eileen P. Drake$—
$—
$—
$—
$—
Kathleen E. Redd—
—
(2,664)—
59,996
Mark A. Tucker—
—
—
—
—
John D. Schumacher46,888
9,007
(211)—
55,684
Christopher C. Cambria—
—
—
—
—
Former Executive Officers as of November 30, 2015
Scott J. Seymour (4)
$—
$—
$7,145
$—
$531,890
Name
Executive
Contributions in the Period
($)(1)
Company
Contributions in the Period
($)(2)
Aggregate
Earnings in
the Period
($)(3)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
Aggregate
Balance at
the End of the Period
($)(4)
Eileen P. Drake$—
$—
$—
$—
$—
Mark A. Tucker—
—
—
—
—
Paul R. Lundstrom—
—
—
—
—
John D. Schumacher34,605
17,407
(4,010)—
120,707
Arjun L. Kampani—
—
—
—
—
(1)
The amounts reported in this column reflect compensation earned in fiscal 20152018 and deferred under the 2009 401(k) BRP Plan. These amounts are also included in the “Salary” column in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table on page 39.45.
(2)
The amounts reported in this column reflect company matches under the 2009 401(k) BRP Plan earned in fiscal 2015.2018. These amounts are also included in the “All Other Compensation” column in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table on page 39.45.
(3)The amounts reported in this column reflect interest credited on account holdings and the change in value of other investment holdings.holdings during 2018.
(4)
The majority of Mr. Seymour’sSchumacher’s balance will be distributed to himwas reported in July 2016.the Summary Compensation Table in the years it was earned with the exception of what was earned in 2016 as he was not a NEO that year.

4552



TERMINATION PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS
Employment Agreement and Indemnity Agreements
On November 23, 2015,March 13, 2018, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Ms. Drake, in connection with her promotion to serve as the Company’s CEO and President, which is described under the section entitled Employment Agreement, Transition Agreement and Plan Provisions - Eileen P. Drake Employment Agreement on page 35.43.
On December 6, 2018, The Company entered into a retention agreement with Mr. Tucker which is described under the section entitled Employment Agreement and Plan Provisions - Mark A. Tucker Retention Agreement on page 44.
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its Directors and the named executive officersNEOs pursuant to which the Company is required to defend and indemnify such individuals if or when they are party or threatened to be made a party to any action, suit, proceeding or claim, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that such individual is or was a Director and/or named executive officerNEO of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control
Termination Benefits for Eileen P. Drake
According to the employment agreement entered into between the Company and Ms. Drake, as discussed in the section above, in the event that the Company terminates Ms. Drake’s employment for Cause or Ms. Drake resigns other than for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in the agreement), the Company’s obligations will generally be limited to the Accrued Obligations as defined on page 35.43.  
If Ms. Drake’s employment is terminated at any timeDescriptions of the payments and benefits provided on termination due to her Death or Disability, (as such terms are defined in the agreement),without Cause, by Ms. Drake shall be entitled to receive the Accrued Obligationsfor Good Reason, and severance payments and benefits equal to the following: (i) twelve (12) months of her base salary paid in installments; (ii) any bonuses earned and paid by the date of termination; (iii) other than the Promotion Award which shall not vest, to the extent unvested at the time of Ms. Drake’s termination of employment, immediate full vesting of all of Ms. Drake’s equity awards under the 2009 Incentive Plan (at target performance, if applicable); (iv) outplacement services provided by the Company-designated outplacement firm for a period of eighteen (18) months starting no later than ninety (90) days from the date of termination with a maximum value of $25,000; (v) in the case of Death, life insurance benefits paid in accordance with the terms of the policy and coverage in which Ms. Drake was enrolled before the date of Death; and (vi) in the case of termination due to Disability, the Company shall pay for the premiums associated with a six (6) month continuation, without any required contributions from Ms. Drake (but subject to all other plan and policy terms) in Ms. Drake’s Company provided life insurance policy in which she is enrolled before the date of termination; and (vii) provided Ms. Drake timely elects and is eligible for COBRA coverage, the Company shall pay for the premiums associated with six (6) months of Ms. Drake’s continued participation, without any required contributions from Ms. Drake (but subject to all other plan terms, including co-payments and deductibles) in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Medical Plan, Aerojet Rocketdyne Dental Plan, and the Aerojet Rocketdyne Vision Plan (the “Benefit Plans”) in which she is enrolled before the date of termination.   
  If Ms. Drake’s employment is terminated at the Company’s election at any time for reasons other than Cause or by Ms. Drake for Good Reason (and not for Death or Disability or in connection with a change in control), then Ms. Drake shall be entitled to receive the Accrued Obligations and severance payments and benefits equal to the following: (i) twelve (12) months of her base salary paid in installments; (ii) other than the Promotion Award which shall not vest, to the extent unvested at the time of Ms. Drake’s termination of employment, immediate full vesting of all of Ms. Drake’s equity awards under the 2009 Incentive Plan (at target performance, if applicable); (iii) Ms. Drake will have the opportunity to continue to participate in the Company provided life insurance policy in which she is enrolled before the date of termination at an amount of 1x Base Salary for a period of twelve (12) months following the date of termination; (iv) provided Ms. Drake timely elects and is eligible for COBRA coverage, the Company shall pay for the premiums associated with eighteen (18) months of Ms. Drake’s continued participation, without any required contributions from Ms. Drake (but subject to all other plan terms, including co-payments and deductibles) in the Benefit Plans in which Executive is enrolled prior to the date of termination; and (v) outplacement services provided by the Company-designated outplacement firm for a period of eighteen (18) months starting no later than ninety (90) days from the date of termination with a maximum value of $25,000. 
If Ms. Drake’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause (excluding due to a death or disability) or by Ms. Drake for Good Reason within eighteen (18) months following a Change in Control, (as defined in the Plan) then Ms. Drake shall be entitled to the following payments and benefits: (i) the Accrued Obligations; (ii) annual target

46


bonus for the pro-rated portion of the fiscal year prior to the Change in Control paid in a lump sum; (iii)  a severance payment equal to eighteen (18) months of (y) Ms. Drake’s base salary and (z) annual target bonus paid in a lump sum; (iv) other than the Promotion Award which shall not vest, to the extent unvested at the time of Ms. Drake’s termination of employment, immediate full vesting of all of Ms. Drake’s equity awardsare provided under the 2009 Incentivesection Employment Agreement and Plan (at target performance, if applicable); (v) Ms.Provisions - Eileen P. Drake will haveEmployment Agreement on page 43. Also see the opportunity to continue to participate in the Company provided life insurance policy in which she is enrolled before the datesection entitled Treatment of termination at an amount of 1x Base SalaryEquity Awards on page 54 for a period of twelve (12) months following the date of termination; (vi) provided Ms. Drake timely elects and is eligible for COBRA coverage, the Company shall pay for the premiums associated with eighteen (18) months of Ms. Drake’s continued participation, without any required contributions from Ms. Drake (but subject to all other plan terms, including co-payments and deductibles) in certain health-related benefit plans in which Ms. Drake is enrolled prior to the date of termination; and (vii) outplacement services provided by the Company-designated outplacement firm for a period of eighteen (18) months starting no later than ninety (90) days from Ms. Drake’s date of termination with a maximum value of $25,000.
Termination Benefits for Scott J. Seymour
On July 7, 2015 the Company and Mr. Seymour entered into the Transition Agreement . Under the terms of the Transition Agreement for the Transition Term, in exchange for assisting with the transition and a general release of all claims, the Company: (i) paid and will continue to pay Mr. Seymour his regular base salary per bi-weekly pay period, less required withholding and other required deductions, for fifteen (15) pay periods; and (ii) continued Mr. Seymour’s enrollment in the Company’s insurance benefits through December 31, 2015. Mr. Seymour was not eligible for any incentive pay under the Company’s Short-term Incentive Plan, vacation accrual or pay, bonus or other form of compensation in relation to the services he performs during the Transition Term.
In addition, the Company: (i) amended the 17,033 time-based shares granted to Mr. Seymour on November 22, 2013 under the Company’s 2013 LTIP that were scheduled to vest on November 22, 2016 so as to accelerate the vesting to the effective date of the Transition Agreement; and (ii) vested the 63,875 performance-based shares granted under the Company’s 2013 LTIP on November 22, 2013 on schedule and according to actual performance achieved as determined by the Company’s Board or the Organization & Compensation Committee as a result of Mr. Seymour re-executing his agreement in January 2016. Mr. Seymour will forfeit all of his other unvested equity awards, including but not limited to grants made on April 7, 2014 and March 30, 2015, and will be treated as retired for the purpose of any options that already vested on June 1, 2015.
The Transition Agreement also provides that for a period of eighteen (18) months following Mr. Seymour’s retirement date, he will not: (i) solicit or encourage any employee or consultant of the Company or any of its parent, subsidiary, or affiliated entities to terminate his/her employment or contractual relationship or accept any other employment; or (ii) provide anyadditional information regarding any employee or consultant of the Company or any of its parent, subsidiary, or affiliated entities, and any predecessor thereto, to any person, including, but not limited to, recruiters and prospective employers. In addition, for the Transition Term, Mr. Seymour will not compete with the business of the Company or any of its parent, subsidiary, or affiliated entities, directly or indirectly, including, without limitation, managing, being employed by, controlling, or operating any competing business.equity award vesting.
Termination Benefits for Other Named Executive Officers
The Company does not have a severance plan in place for the current named executive officersNEOs with the exception of Ms. Drake and Mr. Seymour.Drake. The Company has a policy for a reduction in force, pursuant to which Ms. Redd and Messrs. Cambria,Tucker, Lundstrom, Schumacher and Tucker,Kampani, as well as all other employees of the Company are eligible to participate. The policy provides for employees to continue participating in health, welfare and retirement benefit plans for a period of 60 daystwo months per the terms of the applicable plans and subject to all conditions thereof. Upon execution of a release, the named executive officerNEO is eligible to receive separation pay of five weeks’ pay plus one additional week’s pay for each full or partial year of service, with the maximum amount of separation pay being 30 weeks’ pay. In addition, with an executed release, the named executive officerNEO is eligible to continue participation in certain health and welfare benefits for a total period of 180six months (inclusive of the two months continued participation provided under the applicable plans).
The Company has an executive CIC Policy. The CIC Policy provides certain executive officers of the Company who have been designated in writing by the Board, including all of the NEOs other than Ms. Drake, with compensation and benefits upon a termination of their employment by the Company without “cause” or by the executive for “good reason” (including due to an executive’s death or disability) within the six-month period preceding a “change in control” through the 18-month period following a “change in control” (each as defined in the CIC Policy).
In the event of an applicable termination of employment, the executive shall be entitled to the following:
lump sum payment equal to executive’s annual base salary;
prorated portion of incentive compensation under the Company’s STIP to the “termination date” (as defined in the CIC Policy) and a full STIP payment for the prior year if unpaid as of the termination date, each based upon actual performance;

53



lump sum payment equal to the target incentive compensation executive could have received under the STIP for the entire year in which the termination date occurs;
payment of COBRA benefit premiums until the earlier of the 12-month anniversary of the termination date or when eligible for health insurance coverage through another employer;
to the extent unvested, immediate full vesting of all of the executive’s equity awards; and
outplacement services for a period of 12 months starting no later than 90 days from the date of reduction in force. Overlappingtermination with a maximum value of $15,000.
Receipt of compensation and benefits under both the standard and enhanced benefits provisions will be inclusiveCIC Policy is contingent on the executive’s timely execution of a release in this six month period.a form prescribed by the Company.

47


Treatment of Equity Awards
Equity awards made to employees, including the named executive officers,NEOs, generally provide for the immediate accelerated vesting of the award, including stock options, performance-based stock options at maximum vesting, SARs, time-basedservice-based restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock at maximum vesting (regardless of whether or not the performance target is ultimately met) upon a change in control of the Company regardless of whether a termination occurs.
Estimated Cost of Termination Benefits
The amounts of estimated incremental compensation and benefits payable to the named executive officersNEOs assuming a qualifying termination of employment as of November 30, 2015,December 31, 2018, are shown in the following table.
Name
Cash
Severance
Eileen P. Drake without Cause$736,822
Eileen P. Drake Death or Disability729,038
Eileen P. Drake with Change in Control1,624,322
Kathleen E. Redd—
Christopher C. Cambria—
John D. Schumacher—
Mark A. Tucker—
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
The Company believes that the following table is an accurate representation of beneficial owners of more than 5% of the 64,451,783 shares of the Common Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2016. The table is based on reports of Schedule 13D and Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on or prior to March 1, 2016.
Beneficial Owner
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
Percent
of Class
GAMCO Investors, Inc.
One Corporate Center
Rye, NY 10580
9,243,916
(1) 
14.3% 
BlackRock, Inc.
40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
7,050,694
(2) 
10.9% 
BlueMountain Capital Management, LLC 
280 Park Avenue
12th Floor
New York, NY 10017
4,776,982
(3) 
7.4% 
FMR LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
4,404,701
(4) 
6.8% 
NewSouth Capital Management, Inc.
999 S. Shady Grove Road
Suite 501
Memphis, TN 38120
4,171,740
(5) 
6.5% 
Steel Partners Holdings L.P.
590 Madison Avenue
32nd Floor
New York, NY 10022
4,180,997
(6) 
6.5% 
Victory Capital Management, Inc.
4900 Tiedeman Rd
4th Floor
Brooklyn, OH 44144
3,500,633
(7) 
5.4% 
NameTermination Scenario
Cash
Severance(1)
Benefits ContinuationOutplacement ServicesTotal Severance
Eileen P. DrakeNot for Cause$825,000
$14,127
$25,000
$864,127
Death or Disability825,000
4,948
25,000
854,948
Change in Control2,475,000
14,127
25,000
2,514,127
Mark A. TuckerChange in Control826,775
21,739
15,000
863,514
Paul R. LundstromChange in Control806,078
17,518
15,000
838,596
John D. SchumacherChange in Control615,300
—
15,000
630,300
Arjun L. KampaniChange in Control596,739
21,739
15,000
633,478
(1)Includes shares beneficially owned by Mario J. Gabelli and various affiliated entities, including Gabelli Funds, LLC, GAMCO Asset Management Inc., Teton Advisors, Inc., Gabelli Securities, Inc., GGCP, Inc., and GAMCO Investors, Inc. Gabelli Funds, LLC
Cash Severance does not include the annual cash incentive award earned for 2018 as it is reported sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 2,896,598 shares. GAMCO Asset Managementin the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the 2018 Summary Compensation Table on page 45.

CEO PAY RATIO
48
2018 Pay Ratio Disclosure
For the identification process of our median employee, the Company used the entire population of employees as of December 31, 2017, including employees from an acquisition made by the Company in 2017 and excluding the CEO. Each employee’s total W-2 wages were used as of such date, without annualization or other adjustment. There have been no material changes to the Company’s employee population or compensation arrangements from last year; therefore the same median employee from 2017 is being used for the 2018 Pay Ratio disclosure.

54



Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 4,773,919 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 5,114,418 shares. Teton Advisors, Inc. reported sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,218,900 shares. GGCP, Inc. reported sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 14,000 shares. GAMCO Investors, Inc. reported sole voting power and sole dispositive power with respect to 0 shares. Includes 316,612 shares with respect to which the reporting persons have the right to acquire beneficial ownership upon conversionThe compensation of the Company’s 4 1/16%CEO and 2 1/4% convertible subordinated debentures. Allmedian employee as calculated per the terms of the foregoing information is according to Amendment No. 51 to a Schedule 13D dated August 5, 2015Summary Compensation Table and filed with the SEC on August 6, 2015.pay ratio of the two are as follows:
 SalaryBonusStock AwardsOption/SARs AwardsNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
All Other Compensation
(1)
Total
Eileen P. Drake$805,788
$—
$2,714,218
$412,494
$1,589,775
$12,375
$5,534,650 
Median Employee96,266
100
—
—
—
4,390
100,756 
Pay ratio      55
to 1
(2)(1)BlackRock, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 6,935,897 shares and sole dispositive power with respect
 For All Other Compensation for Ms. Drake, see the 2018 Summary Compensation Table on page 45. All Other Compensation for the median employee consists of Company matching contributions to the 7,050694 shares. The foregoing information is according to Amendment No. 6 to a Schedule 13G dated December 31, 2015 and filed with the SEC on January 8, 2016.
(3)BlueMountain Capital Management, LLC reported shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to the 4,776,982 shares. The foregoing information is according to Amendment No. 1 to a Schedule 13G dated December 31, 2015 and filed with the SEC on February 2, 2016.
(4)FMR LLC reported sole voting power with respect to 119,769 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to the 4,404,701 shares. The foregoing information is according to a Schedule 13G dated December 31, 2015 and filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016.
(5)NewSouth Capital Management, Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 3,425,945 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to the 4,171,740 shares. The foregoing information is according to an Amendment No. 2 to a Schedule 13G dated December 31, 2015 and filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016.
(6)Consists of shares owned directly by SPH Group Holdings LLC (“SPHG Holdings”). Steel Partners Holdings L.P. (“Steel Holdings”) owns 99% of the membership interests of SPH Group LLC (“SPHG”). SPHG is the sole member of SPHG Holdings. Steel Partners Holdings GP Inc. (“Steel Partners GP”) is the general partner of Steel Holdings, the managing member of SPHG and the manager of SPHG Holdings. By virtue of these relationships, each of Steel Holdings, SPHG and Steel Holdings GP may be deemed to beneficially own the shares owned directly by SPHG Holdings. Each of the foregoing may be deemed to have shared voting and dispositive power with respect to such shares. All of the foregoing information is according to Amendment No. 22 to a Schedule 13D dated October 28, 2013 and filed with the SEC on October 28, 2013.
(7)Victory Capital Management Inc. reported sole voting power with respect to 3,303,809 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to the 3,500,633 shares. The foregoing information is according to a Schedule 13G dated December 31, 2015 and filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016.401(k) savings plan.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceThe SEC’s rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s Directors and certain officers and persons who own more than 10% of the outstanding Common Stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the SEC and the NYSE. The SEC also requires such persons to furnish the Company with copies of the Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms that the Company has received, the Company believes that all of its Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners complied with all filing requirements applicable to them with respect to transactions during fiscal 2015.

4955



PROPOSAL 2
ADVISORY VOTE ON AEROJET ROCKETDYNE’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
As we do each year, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, the Company is providing its stockholders the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory, non-binding basis, the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules.
As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Company’s executive compensation program is designed to support our business goals and promote both short-term and long-term growth and directly link pay to performance. The compensation program for executive officers has historically consisted of the following principal elements: short-term compensation, including base salaries and annual cash incentive awards; long-term compensation equity incentive awards, including restricted stock, stock options and cash-settled SARs; and in-service and post-retirement/employment benefits.
We are asking stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of the executive officers named in the “Summary Compensation Table” included in this Proxy Statement (referred to as the “named executive officers”). This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the named executive officers’ compensation. Accordingly, we will ask stockholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 2015 Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.”
The say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Organization & Compensation Committee or our Board. The Board and the Organization & Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns and the Organization & Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
The affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote is necessary to approve this proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. While this vote is required by law, it will neither be binding on the Company or the Board, nor will it create or imply any change in the fiduciary duties of, or impose any additional fiduciary duty on, the Company or the Board.
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the advisory approval of Aerojet Rocketdyne’s executive compensation.


50


PROPOSAL 3
3: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Audit Committee has appointed PwC, an independent registered public accounting firm, to serve as the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal 2016.2019. PwC has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2006. The Audit Committee is submitting Proposal 3 to stockholders for ratification as a corporate governance practice. Ultimately, the Audit Committee retains full discretion and will make all determinations with respect to the appointment of the independent auditors, whether or not the Company’s stockholders ratify the appointment.
Representatives of PwC are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to answer questions. They also will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and respond to appropriate questions.
The affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote is necessary to approve this proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on Proposal 3.proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. The persons named in the accompanying form of proxy intend to vote such proxies to ratify the appointment of PwC unless a contrary choice is indicated.
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of PwC as the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal 2016.
Audit Fees
Audit Fees and All Other Fees
The following table summarizes the aggregate fees billed for 2018 and 2017 by PwC:
    
(Dollars in Millions)2018 2017
Audit Fees(1)
$3.6
 $3.2
Audit-Related Fees(2)
0.3
 0.8
Tax Fees(3)
—
 0.1
All Other Fees(4)
—
 —
Total Fees$3.9
 $4.1
    
Audit fees for professional services rendered by them for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements including the integrated audit of internal control over financial reporting, the review of financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, or services that are normally provided in connection with statutory audits were:
(1)Audit fees include professional services rendered by PwC for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements including the integrated audit of internal control over financial reporting, the review of financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, or services that are normally provided in connection with statutory audits.
(2)Audit-related fees include assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements, and are not reported under “Audit Fees” above and consisted primarily of efforts related to the adoption of new accounting standards.
(3)Tax fees include items billed for professional services rendered by PwC for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning and were immaterial.
(4)All other fees include products and services provided by PwC other than those reported under “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees,” and “Tax Fees” and were immaterial.
  Fiscal Year Ended
  2015 2014
  In Thousands
Audit fees $4,776
 $6,359
Audit-Related Fees
Audit-related fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements, and are not reported under “Audit Fees” above were:
  Fiscal Year Ended
  2015 2014
  In Thousands
Audit-related fees $78
 $100
Audit-related fees consisted of Department of Energy audits performed on certain contracts.
Tax Fees
Tax fees billed for professional services rendered by them for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were:
  Fiscal Year Ended
  2015 2014
  In Thousands
Tax fees $17
 $36

51


All Other Fees
All other fees for products and services provided by them, other than those reported under “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees” and “Tax Fees,” were:
  Fiscal Year Ended
  2015 2014
  In Thousands
All other fees $4
 $4
Audit fees relating to audits of the Company’s Pension Plan and Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plans”) are not included in the above amounts.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of the Company’s Independent Auditors
Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has the responsibility for appointing, setting compensation and overseeing the work of the independent auditors. In recognition of this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established a policy to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditors.
Prior to engagement of the independent auditors for the next year’s audit, management will submit an aggregate listing of services expected to be rendered during the year for Audit, Audit-Related, Tax and All Other Fees for approval. Prior to engagement, the Audit Committee pre-approves these services by category of service. The fees are budgeted and the Audit Committee requires the independent auditors and management to report actual fees versus the budget periodically throughout the year by category of service. During the fiscal year, circumstances may arise when it may become necessary to engage the independent auditors for additional services not contemplated in the original pre-approval. In those instances, the Audit Committee requires specific pre-approval before engaging the independent auditors.

56



The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is delegated must report, for informational purposes only, any pre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. None of the services described above was approved by the Audit Committee under the de minimus exception provided by Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) under Regulation S-X.
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of PwC as the Company’s independent auditors for 2019.



57



PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S 2019 EQUITY AND PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN
On March 19, 2019, the Board, upon recommendation of its Organization & Compensation Committee, unanimously adopted a resolution declaring it advisable to approve the adoption of the Company’s 2019 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the “2019 Incentive Plan”), which authorizes the issuance of 4,453,022 shares of Common Stock thereunder. The 2019 Incentive Plan permits the grant of cash-based awards, nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, SARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and other stock-based awards.
The complete text of the 2019 Incentive Plan is attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement. The following discussion is qualified in all respects by reference to Appendix B.
The Company believes that an adequate reserve of shares available for issuance under the 2019 Incentive Plan is necessary to enable the Company to attract, motivate, and retain key employees and Directors and to provide an additional incentive for such individuals through stock ownership and other rights that promote and recognize the financial success and growth of the Company. For this purpose, stockholders are being asked to approve the 2019 Incentive Plan and the 4,453,022 share authorization thereunder. If approved by stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the 2019 Incentive Plan will become effective on that date (the “Effective Date”). Upon approval, the 2019 Incentive Plan will supersede the Company’s 2018 Incentive Plan with respect to future awards and no further awards will be granted pursuant to the 2018 Incentive Plan.
As part of the Board’s decision to approve the 2019 Incentive Plan, including the total number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder, the Board analyzed the Company’s historical burn rate, anticipated future equity award needs and the dilutive impact of the 2019 Incentive Plan’s share reserve. In particular, the Board considered:
Shares Remaining Available Under the 2018 Incentive Plan: As of March 13, 2019, 3,583,022 shares remained available for issuance under the 2018 Incentive Plan. If our stockholders approve the 2019 Incentive Plan, those 3,583,022 shares plus (i) an additional 870,000, plus (ii) shares attributable to awards granted under the 2018 Incentive Plan and the Company’s 2009 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (together with the 2018 Incentive Plan the “Prior Plans”) forfeited after March 13, 2019 and prior to the Effective Date, and less (iii) shares attributable to new awards granted under 2018 Incentive Plan after March 13, 2019 and prior to the Effective Date will be available for issuance under the 2019 Incentive Plan. If the 2019 Incentive Plan is approved, no new awards will be made under the 2018 Incentive Plan after the Effective Date.
In addition, shares subject to awards outstanding as of the Effective Date under the Prior Plans that, on or after the Effective Date, cease for any reason to be subject to such awards (other than by reason of exercise or settlement of the awards to the extent they are exercised for or settled in vested and nonforfeitable shares) will become available for future awards under the 2019 Incentive Plan. As of March 13, 2019, the shares to be issued upon the exercise or settlement of outstanding awards under our existing equity compensation plans (including both of the Prior Plans) were as follows:
429,442 shares underlying outstanding options, with a weighted average exercise price of $22.90and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 4.5 years; and
1,566,925outstanding full value awards (consisting of 1,148,320shares subject to performance-based restricted stock and 418,605shares subject to restricted stock).
There are 1,467,230outstanding SARs that are not counted for purposes of (i) determining shares remaining under the Existing Plan, (ii) burn rates, or (iii) overhang because the SARs may only be settled in cash, not shares. The outstanding SARs have a weighted average base price of $25.86and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 5.5 years and will be settled in cash.
Historical Burn Rate: Our equity plan share usage over 2016, 2017 and 2018 represented a three-year average burn rate of 1.30% of our weighted average common shares outstanding for each such year. SARs, all of which are settled in cash, are not included in the calculation of the average burn rate. The table below summarizes the number of stock option and full value awards granted and the burn rate for each of the last three fiscal years to calculate the three-year weighted average burn rate of 1.30%.

58



Fiscal YearStock Options GrantedRestricted Stock GrantedTotal GrantedWeighted Average Common Shares OutstandingBurn Rate Per Year
2018—
727,117
727,117
74,768,190
0.97%
2017—
595,950
595,950
73,014,331
0.82%
2016200,000
1,180,986
1,380,986
65,645,357
2.10%
Dilution: Dilution is commonly measured by “overhang,” which generally refers to the amount of potential dilution to current stockholders that could result from the future issuance of the shares reserved under an equity compensation plan. Overhang is typically expressed as a percentage (equal to a fraction where the numerator is the sum of the number of shares reserved but not issued under equity compensation plans plus the number of shares subject to outstanding awards and the denominator is the sum of the numerator plus the total number of shares outstanding). Outstanding SARs, all of which would be settled in cash, are not included in the calculation of overhang. If the 2019 Incentive Plan is approved and taken into account, our voting power dilution will be approximately 8.2% as of March 13, 2019.
The Company intends to register the shares available for issuance under the 2019 Incentive Plan on a Registration Statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as soon as is practicable after receiving stockholder approval.
Summary of the 2019 Incentive Plan
Purpose of the 2019 Incentive Plan. The 2019 Incentive Plan is intended as an incentive to attract, motivate, and retain employees and Directors upon whose judgment, initiative, and efforts the financial success and growth of the business of the Company largely depend, and to provide an additional incentive for such individuals through stock ownership and other rights that promote and recognize the financial success and growth of the Company and create value for stockholders.
Administration of the 2019 Incentive Plan. The 2019 Incentive Plan is to be administered by the Organization & Compensation Committee consisting of two or more Directors who are “non-employee Directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3. In the event that for any reason the Organization & Compensation Committee is unable to act or if the Organization & Compensation Committee at the time of any grant, award or other acquisition under the 2019 Incentive Plan does not consist of two or more “non-employee Directors,” or if there is no such committee, then the 2019 Incentive Plan will be administered by the Board, except to the extent such Board action would have adverse consequences under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.
Subject to the other provisions of the 2019 Incentive Plan, the Organization & Compensation Committee will have the authority, in its discretion: (i) to grant cash-based awards, non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, SARs, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and other stock-based awards, all of which are referred to collectively as “Awards”; (ii) to determine the terms and conditions of each Award granted (which need not be identical); (iii) to interpret the Incentive Plan and all Awards granted thereunder; and (iv) to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2019 Incentive Plan.
Eligibility. The persons eligible for participation in the 2019 Incentive Plan as recipients of Awards include employees and non-employee Directors to the Company or any subsidiary or affiliate of the Company. Approximately 5,200 employees and six non-employee Directors are currently eligible to participate in the 2019 Incentive Plan. Amongst those eligible to participate, approximately 120 employees and six non-employee Directors received awards under the Prior Plans in fiscal 2018. In selecting participants, and determining the number of shares of Common Stock covered by each Award, the Organization & Compensation Committee may consider any factors that it deems relevant.
Shares Subject to the 2019 Incentive Plan. Subject to the conditions outlined below, the total number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued pursuant to Awards granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan may not exceed 4,453,022shares of Common Stock, plus shares attributable to awards granted under the Prior Plans and forfeited after March 13, 2019 and prior to the Effective Date, and less shares attributable to new awards granted under the 2018 Incentive Plan after March 13, 2019 and prior to the Effective Date. In addition, any shares subject to outstanding awards under the Prior Plans as of the Effective Date that, on or after the Effective Date, cease for any reason to be subject to such awards (other than by reason of exercise or settlement of the awards to the extent they

59



are exercised for or settled in vested and nonforfeitable shares of Common Stock) shall also become available for issuance under the 2019 Incentive Plan. All of the shares available for issuance under the 2019 Incentive Plan may be incentive stock options. The 2019 Incentive Plan limits the size of Awards that may be granted to non-employee Directors as follows: the maximum aggregate dollar value of equity-based awards (based on the grant date fair value of such awards) and cash compensation granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan or otherwise during any one year to any one non-employee Director may not exceed $400,000, provided that for any non-employee Director who is designated Chairman or Lead Director of the Board, the maximum aggregate dollar value of equity-based and cash compensation granted to any such non-employee Director in any one year may be up to 200% of the foregoing limit.
In the event of certain corporate events or transactions (including, but not limited to, the sale of all, or substantially all, of the assets of the Company or a change in the shares of the Company or the capitalization of the Company), the Organization & Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of a participant’s rights under the 2019 Incentive Plan, shall substitute or adjust, as applicable, the number and kind of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the 2019 Incentive Plan or under particular forms of Awards, the number and kind of shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding Awards, the option price or grant price applicable to outstanding Awards, the non-employee Director Award limits, and other value determinations applicable to outstanding Awards.
Options. An option granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan is designated at the time of grant as either an incentive stock option or as a non-qualified stock option. Upon the grant of an option to purchase shares of Common Stock, the Organization & Compensation Committee will specify the option price, the maximum duration of the option, the number of shares of Common Stock to which the option pertains, the conditions upon which an option shall become vested and exercisable, and such other provisions as the Organization & Compensation Committee shall determine which are not inconsistent with the terms of the 2019 Incentive Plan. The purchase price of each share of Common Stock purchasable under an option will be determined by the Organization & Compensation Committee at the time of grant, but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of such share of Common Stock on the date the option is granted, provided, however, that an option granted outside the United States to a person who is a non-U.S. taxpayer may be granted with an option price less than the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant if necessary to utilize a locally available tax advantage. No option shall be exercisable later than the seventh anniversary date of its grant, provided, that for options granted to participants outside the United States who are non-U.S. taxpayers, the Organization & Compensation Committee has the authority to grant options that have a term greater than seven years.
SARs. SARs, which may be issued in tandem with options or be freestanding, will be exercisable at such time or times and subject to such terms and conditions as determined by the Organization & Compensation Committee. The term of SARs granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan shall be determined by the Organization & Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, and except as determined otherwise by the Organization & Compensation Committee, no SAR shall be exercisable later than the seventh anniversary date of its grant, provided, however, that for SARs granted to participants who are non-U.S. taxpayers, the Organization & Compensation Committee has the authority to grant SARs that have a term greater than seven years.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. Shares of restricted stock and/or restricted stock units may be granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan aside from, or in association with, any other Award and will be subject to certain conditions and contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the 2019 Incentive Plan, as the Organization & Compensation Committee deems desirable. Unless otherwise determined by the Organization & Compensation Committee and set forth in an award agreement, to the extent permitted or required by law, as determined by the Organization & Compensation Committee, participants holding shares of restricted stock granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan may be granted the right to exercise full voting rights with respect to the underlying shares during the period of restriction. Participants will not have voting rights with respect to restricted stock units granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan. The Organization & Compensation Committee will determine whether dividends or dividend equivalents will be provided in respect of restricted stock or restricted stock units but in no event will dividends or dividend equivalents be paid currently with respect to unvested awards.
Performance Units/Performance Shares. Subject to the terms and provisions of the 2019 Incentive Plan, the Organization & Compensation Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant performance units and/or performance shares to participants in such amounts and upon such terms as the Organization & Compensation Committee shall determine. Each performance unit shall have an initial value that is established by the Organization & Compensation Committee at the time of grant. Each performance share shall have an initial value equal to the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant. The Organization & Compensation Committee shall

60



set performance goals in its discretion which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the value and/or number of performance units/performance shares that will be paid out to the participant. In no event will dividends or dividend equivalents be paid currently with respect to unvested performance units or performance shares.
Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards. Subject to the provisions of the 2019 Incentive Plan, the Organization & Compensation Committee may grant cash-based awards or other types of equity-based or equity-related awards not otherwise described by the terms of the 2019 Incentive Plan (including the grant or offer for sale of unrestricted shares of Common Stock) in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions, as the Organization & Compensation Committee shall determine. Such Awards may involve the transfer of actual shares of Common Stock to participants, or payment in cash or otherwise of amounts based on the value of shares of Common Stock and may include, without limitation, Awards designed to comply with or take advantage of the applicable local laws of jurisdictions other than the United States. Each cash-based award shall specify a payment amount or payment range as determined by the Organization & Compensation Committee. Each other stock-based award shall be expressed in terms of shares of Common Stock or units based on shares of Common Stock, as determined by the Organization & Compensation Committee.
Restrictions on Transferability. The Awards granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan are not transferable and may be exercised solely by a participant or his or her authorized representative during his or her lifetime or after his or her death by the person or persons entitled thereto under his or her will or the laws of descent, distribution or his or her designation of beneficiary, certain permitted transfers to family members or family trusts, or as otherwise required by law. Any attempt to transfer, assign, pledge or otherwise dispose of, or to subject to execution, attachment or similar process, any Award contrary to the provisions set forth in the 2019 Incentive Plan will be void and ineffective and will give no right to the purported transferee.
Change in Control. Except as provided in an Evidence of Award, all shares covered by Awards granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan (including both shares that vest based on continued employement and shares that vest based on attainment or performance goals) shall become immediately vested in full, regardless of performance, and nonforfeitable upon the occurrence of a Change in Control that shall occur while the Participant is an Employee or non-employee Director of the Company.
Clawback. In order to satisfy the requirements of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, awards granted to executive officers may be subject to forfeiture in certain circumstances, including if the Company is required to restate prior period financial statements and any excess incentive-based compensation that was paid out based on erroneous financial information.
Termination of the 2019 Incentive Plan. Unless sooner terminated as provided therein, the 2019 Incentive Plan shall terminate ten years from the date the 2019 Incentive Plan is approved by stockholders, provided that incentive stock options may not be granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan after March 19, 2029. The termination of the 2019 Incentive Plan shall not adversely affect any Awards granted prior to the 2019 Incentive Plan termination.
Amendments to the 2019 Incentive Plan. The Organization & Compensation Committee may at any time alter, amend, modify, suspend, or terminate the 2019 Incentive Plan and any evidence of Award in whole or in part; provided, however, that, without the prior approval of the Company’s stockholders, options issued under the 2019 Incentive Plan to any individual will not be repriced, replaced, or regranted through cancellation, and no amendment of the 2019 Incentive Plan shall be made without stockholder approval if stockholder approval is required by law, regulation, or stock exchange rule; and except where required by tax law, without the prior written consent of the participant, no modification shall adversely affect an Award under the 2019 Incentive Plan. The Organization & Compensation Committee cannot issue any Awards while the 2019 Incentive Plan is suspended.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
Incentive Options. Options that are granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan and that are intended to qualify as incentive stock options must comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Code. An option holder is not taxed upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option; however, the difference between the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock on the exercise date and the exercise price will be an item of adjustment for purposes of the alternative minimum tax. If an option holder holds shares of Common Stock acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option for at least two years following the date of the grant of the option and at least one year following the exercise of the option, the option holder’s gain, if any, upon a subsequent disposition of such shares

61



will be treated as a long-term capital gain for federal income tax purposes. The measure of the gain is the difference between the proceeds received on disposition and the option holder’s basis in the shares (which generally would equal the exercise price). If the option holder disposes of shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to exercise of an incentive stock option before satisfying the one-and-two year holding periods described above, the option holder, who under the 2019 Incentive Plan must notify the Company of the disposition, may recognize both ordinary income and a capital gain in the year of disposition. The amount of ordinary income will be the lesser of (i) the amount realized on disposition less the option holder’s adjusted basis in the shares (generally the option exercise price); or (ii) the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date and the option price. The balance of the consideration received on such disposition will be a long-term capital gain if the shares had been held for at least one year following exercise of the incentive stock option.
The Company is not entitled to an income tax deduction on the grant or the exercise of an incentive stock option or on the option holder’s disposition of the shares of Common Stock after satisfying the holding period requirement described above. If the holding periods are not satisfied, the Company will generally be entitled to an income tax deduction in the year the option holder disposes of the shares, in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the option holder.
Non-qualified Options. In the case of a non-qualified stock option, an option holder is not taxed on the grant of such option. Upon exercise, however, the participant recognizes ordinary income equal to the difference between the option price and the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock on the date of the exercise. The Company is generally entitled to an income tax deduction in the year of exercise in the amount of ordinary income recognized by the option holder. Any gain on subsequent disposition of the shares of Common Stock is a long-term capital gain if the shares are held for at least one year following the exercise. The Company does not receive an income tax deduction for this gain.
SARs. No taxable income will be recognized by an option holder upon receipt of a SAR and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction upon the grant of such right.
Upon the exercise of a SAR, the holder will include in taxable income, for federal income tax purposes, the fair market value of the cash and other property received with respect to the SAR and the Company will generally be entitled to a corresponding tax deduction.
Other Awards. A recipient of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units will not have taxable income upon grant, but will have ordinary income at the time of vesting. The amount of income will equal the fair market value on the vesting date of the shares and/or cash received minus the amount, if any, paid by the recipient. A recipient of restricted stock may instead, however, elect to be taxed on the fair market value at the time of grant. The Company will generally be entitled to an income tax deduction for the taxable year for which the recipient includes the amount in income.
The 2019 Incentive Plan is designed so that all awards are either exempt from Section 409A of the Code or will satisfy Section 409A of the Code.
The foregoing general tax discussion is intended for the information of stockholders considering how to vote with respect to this proposal and not as tax guidance to participants in the 2019 Incentive Plan. Participants are strongly urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the federal, state, local, foreign and other tax consequences to them of participating in the 2019 Incentive Plan.
New Plan Benefits
Awards under the 2019 Incentive Plan will be granted at the discretion of the Organization & Compensation Committee and, accordingly, are not yet determinable. In addition, benefits under the 2019 Incentive Plan will depend on a number of factors, including the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on future dates, and actual Company performance against performance goals established with respect to performance awards, among other things. Consequently, it is not possible to determine the exact benefits or number of shares subject to Awards that may be granted in the future to persons eligible for participation in the 2019 Incentive Plan.
As of March 13, 2019, the fair market value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock was $34.19.

62



Vote Required and Board Recommendation
The affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote is necessary to approve this proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against this proposal.
The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR approval of the Company’s 2019 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan.

63



FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FOR THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
GENERAL INFORMATION
The Board solicits the enclosed Proxy for use at the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting to be held on May 9, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time. As in previous years, our 2019 Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders, which will be conducted via live webcast. You can attend the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit questions during the meeting by visiting ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
WHY DID I RECEIVE THIS PROXY STATEMENT?
The Board is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Annual Meeting because you were a stockholder of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, at the close of business (5:00 p.m. Eastern time) on March 13, 2019 (the “Record Date”), and therefore you are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement contains information about the matters to be voted on at the meeting and the voting process, as well as information about the Company’s Directors and executive officers.
We are providing you with a Notice of Internet Availability and access to these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the Board to be used at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. The Notice of Internet Availability will be sent to stockholders of record and beneficial stockholders as of the Record Date starting on or around March 29, 2019. The proxy materials, including the Notice of Annual Meeting, this Proxy Statement, and the 2018 Annual Report, will be made available to stockholders on the Internet on March 29, 2019. For those participants who hold shares of Common Stock in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan, you will receive a full set of annual meeting materials and a proxy card for those shares.
WHY DID I RECEIVE A NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS THIS YEAR INSTEAD OF A FULL SET OF PROXY MATERIALS?
As in previous years, pursuant to the rules of the SEC, we are providing access to the Company’s proxy materials over the Internet rather than printing and mailing them to all stockholders. We believe electronic delivery will expedite the receipt of these materials, reduce the environmental impact of our annual meeting materials and will help lower our costs. Therefore, the Notice of Internet Availability will be mailed to stockholders (or e-mailed, in the case of stockholders that have previously requested to receive proxy materials electronically) starting on or around March 29, 2019. The Notice of Internet Availability will provide instructions as to how stockholders may access and review the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice of Internet Availability or, alternatively, how to request that a copy of the proxy materials, including a proxy card, be sent to them by mail. The Notice of Internet Availability will also provide voting instructions. In addition, stockholders may request to receive the proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail on an ongoing basis for future stockholder meetings. Please note that, while our proxy materials are available at www.proxyvote.com referenced in the Notice of Internet Availability, no other information contained on the website is incorporated by reference in or considered to be a part of this Proxy Statement.
WHY DID I RECEIVE MORE THAN ONE NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY?
You may receive multiple Notices of Internet Availability if you hold your shares of Common Stock in multiple accounts (such as through a brokerage account). If you hold your shares of Common Stock in multiple accounts you should vote your shares as described in each separate Notice of Internet Availability you receive.
IF AEROJET ROCKETDYNE IS UTILIZING NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY, WHY DID I RECEIVE A FULL SET OF ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS AND A PROXY CARD?
For those participants who hold shares of Common Stock in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan, you will receive a full set of annual meeting materials and a proxy card for those shares because Fidelity Management Trust Company (the “Trustee”) is not utilizing a Notice of Internet Availability for the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan participants.

64



WHAT AM I VOTING ON?
You are voting on the following items of business at the Annual Meeting:
To elect the seven directors named in the Proxy Statement to our Board to serve until the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified (the Board’s nominees are: Kevin P. Chilton; Thomas A. Corcoran; Eileen P. Drake; James R. Henderson; Warren G. Lichtenstein; Lance W. Lord and Martin Turchin) (“Proposal 1”);
To consider and approve an advisory vote on Aerojet Rocketdyne’s Executive Compensation (“Proposal 2”);
To ratify the appointment of PwC, an independent registered public accounting firm, as independent auditors of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2019 (“Proposal 3”);
To approve the Company’s 2019 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (“Proposal 4”); and
Any other matter that may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting.
WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTE?
Stockholders of record as of the Record Date are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote.
WHAT ARE THE VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD?
The Board recommends that you vote your shares “FOR” each of the Board’s seven nominees standing for election to the Board; “FOR” the advisory vote to approve Aerojet Rocketdyne’s executive compensation; “FOR” the ratification of PwC as independent auditors of the Company; and “FOR” the approval of the Company’s 2019 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan.
HOW DO I VOTE?
This year’s Annual Meeting will be held entirely online to allow greater participation. Stockholders may participate in the Annual Meeting by visiting ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com on the Internet.
To participate in the Annual Meeting you will need the control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability, on your proxy card, or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. Even if you plan to participate in the Annual Meeting online, we urge you to vote as soon as possible by one of the following methods to make sure your shares are represented if you later decide not to participate in the virtual Annual Meeting online.
SHARES HELD IN THE AEROJET ROCKETDYNE RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
Please follow the voting instructions provided by Fidelity Management Trust Company, the Trustee. You may sign, date and return a voting instruction card to the Trustee or submit voting instructions by telephone or the Internet. If you provide voting instructions by mail, telephone, or the Internet, the Trustee will vote your shares as you have directed (or not vote your shares, if that is your direction). If you do not provide voting instructions, the Trustee will vote your shares in the same proportion as shares for which the Trustee has received voting instructions. You must submit voting instructions to the Trustee by no later than May 6, 2019, at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time in order for your shares to be voted as you have directed by the Trustee at the Annual Meeting. Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan participants may not vote their Plan shares in person at the Annual Meeting.

65



SHARES HELD BY YOU, YOUR BROKER, BANK OR OTHER HOLDER OF RECORD
You may vote in several different ways:
By Internet during the Annual Meeting:You may vote electronically during the Annual Meeting on Thursday, May 9, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time via the Internet at ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com using the control number we have provided to you. You may also be represented by another person at the meeting via the Internet by executing a proxy properly designating that person. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and wish to vote electronically during the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other holder of record.
By Telephone: You may vote by calling the toll-free telephone number indicated on your proxy card. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your voting instructions have been properly recorded.
By Internet before the meeting date:You may vote by going to the Internet website indicated on your proxy card. Confirmation that your voting instructions have been properly recorded will be provided.
By Mail:You may vote by completing, signing, dating and returning a proxy card which will be mailed to you if you request delivery of a full set of proxy materials. A postage-paid envelope will be provided along with the proxy card.
Telephone and Internet voting before the meeting date for stockholders of record will be available until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 8, 2019. A mailed proxy card must be received by May 8, 2019, in order to be voted at the Annual Meeting. The availability of telephone and Internet voting for beneficial owners of other shares held in “street name” will depend on your broker, bank or other holder of record and we recommend that you follow the voting instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability that you receive from them.
If you are mailed a set of proxy materials and a proxy card or voting instruction card and you choose to vote by telephone or by Internet, you do not have to return your proxy card or voting instruction card. However, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting via the Internet, we recommend that you vote your shares in advance so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the meeting via the Internet.
IS MY VOTE CONFIDENTIAL?
Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed, either within the Company or to third parties, except: (1) as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements; (2) to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote; and (3) to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation. Occasionally, stockholders provide written comments on their proxy card, which are then forwarded to management.
MAY I ATTEND THE MEETING?
All stockholders and properly appointed proxy holders may attend the Annual Meeting over the Internet at ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com. Stockholders who plan to attend must have access to the control number we have provided to you to join the virtual Annual Meeting. Instructions on how to attend and participate via the Internet, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, are posted at ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com. Stockholders of record will be verified against an official list available electronically at the Annual Meeting. The Company reserves the right to deny admittance to anyone who cannot adequately show proof of share ownership as of the Record Date.
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HOLDING SHARES AS A STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD AND AS A BENEFICIAL OWNER?
If your shares are registered directly in your name with Aerojet Rocketdyne’s transfer agent, Computershare, Inc., you are considered a “stockholder of record” or a “registered stockholder” of those shares. In this case, your Notice of Internet Availability has been sent to you directly by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trust or other nominee or custodian, including shares you may own as a participant in the Aerojet Rocketdyne Retirement Savings Plan, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares, which are held in “street name.” A Notice of Internet Availability has been forwarded to you by or on behalf of your broker, bank, trustee or other holder who is considered the stockholder of record of those shares. As the

66



beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, trustee or other holder of record as to how to vote your shares by following their instructions for voting.
WHAT ARE BROKER NON-VOTES AND HOW ARE THEY COUNTED?
Broker non-votes occur when nominees, such as brokers and banks holding shares on behalf of the beneficial owners, are prohibited from exercising discretionary voting authority for beneficial owners who have not provided voting instructions at least ten days before the Annual Meeting. If no instructions are given within that time frame, the nominees may vote those shares on matters deemed “routine” by the NYSE. Proposals 1, 2 and 4 are non-routine matters and, nominees cannot vote without instructions from the beneficial owner, resulting in so-called “broker non-votes.” Broker non-votes are not counted for the purposes of determining the number of shares present in person or represented by proxy on a voting matter. For these reasons, please promptly vote by telephone, or Internet, or sign, date and return the voting instruction card your broker or nominee has enclosed, in accordance with the instructions on the card.
MAY I CHANGE MY VOTE?
If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by:
Returning a signed proxy card bearing a later date;
Sending written notice of revocation to the Company, c/o the Secretary;
Submitting a new, proper proxy by telephone, Internet or paper ballot, after the date of the earlier voted proxy; or
Attending the Annual Meeting via the Internet at ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com and voting using the control number we have provided to you.
If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or other nominee. You may also vote at the Annual Meeting via the Internet at ajrd.onlineshareholdermeeting.com if you obtain a legal proxy as described above.
WHAT VOTE IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE EACH PROPOSAL?
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. Votes cast for a nominee will be counted in favor of election. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count either in favor of, or against, the election of a nominee. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of Directors set by the Board for election.
Proposals 2 through 4 will require the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on Proposals 2 through 4. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against Proposals 2 through 4.
DO STOCKHOLDERS HAVE CUMULATIVE VOTING RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS?
No. Stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of Directors.
WHAT CONSTITUTES A QUORUM?
As of the Record Date, 78,667,616 shares of Common Stock were outstanding. A majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, represented in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum. Shares represented by a proxy that directs that the shares abstain from voting or that a vote be withheld on a matter and broker “non-votes” will be included at the Annual Meeting for quorum purposes. Shares represented by proxy as to which no voting instructions are given as to matters to be voted upon will be included at the Annual Meeting for quorum purposes.

67



WHAT IS THE COMPANY’S INTERNET ADDRESS?
The Company’s Internet address is www.AerojetRocketdyne.com. You can access this Proxy Statement and the 2018 Annual Report at this Internet address, as well as all other Company filings with the SEC. The Company will provide free of charge a copy in print of the 2018 Annual Report, including the financial statements and schedules required to be filed thereto, to any beneficial owner of the Company’s Common Stock as of the Record Date who sends a written request to Secretary, Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., 222 N. Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 500, El Segundo, California 90245.
WILL ANY OTHER MATTERS BE VOTED ON?
As of the date of this Proxy Statement, our management knows of no other matter that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than those matters discussed in this Proxy Statement. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting and call for a vote of the stockholders, validly executed proxies in the enclosed form will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board.
WHO IS SOLICITING PROXIES UNDER THIS PROXY STATEMENT?
The proxies being solicited hereby are being solicited by our Board. The cost of soliciting proxies in the enclosed form will be borne by the Company. Officers and regular employees of the Company may, but without receiving additional compensation other than their regular compensation, solicit proxies by further mailings, personal conversations, by telephone, facsimile, or electronic means. The Company will, upon request, reimburse brokerage firms and others for their reasonable expenses in forwarding solicitation material to the beneficial owners of the stock. The Company has retained Okapi Partners, an independent proxy solicitation firm, to assist in soliciting proxies on its behalf. The Company has agreed to pay Okapi Partners a fee of $10,000, plus costs and expenses, for these services. If stockholders need assistance with casting or changing their vote, they should contact our proxy solicitor, Okapi Partners, toll-free at 1-877-566-1922.
ARE THERE DISSENTER’S OR APPRAISAL RIGHTS?
The Company’s stockholders are not entitled to dissenter’s or appraisal rights under Delaware law in connection with any of the items of business currently contemplated to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.

68



MISCELLANEOUS
Other Business
As of the time this Proxy Statement was printed, the Company was unaware of any proposals to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than those set forth herein, but, if other matters do properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy pursuant to discretionary authority conferred thereby, to vote the proxy in accordance with their best judgment on such matters.
Submission of Stockholder Proposals
A stockholder who wishes to submit a proposal for consideration at the 2020 annual meeting of Stockholder Proposals
Stockholders who intendstockholders pursuant to have their proposals consideredRule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act and desires for inclusionthat proposal to appear in the Company’s proxy materials relatedfor that meeting must submit the proposal in writing to the 2017 annual meetingChairman of stockholders must submit their proposals tothe Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee, c/o Secretary, Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., 222 N. Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 500, El Segundo, California 90245, and the Company bymust receive such proposal no later than November 18, 2016. 30, 2019. Each stockholder proposal must comply with the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the Bylaws as in effect at the time of such notice. Submitting a stockholder proposal does not guarantee that it will be included in the Company’s proxy materials.
Stockholders who intendwish to present a proposalproposals of other business at the 20172020 annual meeting of stockholders without inclusion of that proposal in the Company’s proxy materials, but instead for presentation directly at that meeting, are required to comply with the requirements set forth in the Bylaws. In part, these Bylaws require that for such other business to be properly brought before the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, a stockholder must provide written notice of their proposal to the Company no later than the close of business on January 27, 2017February 9, 2020, nor earlier than the close of business on December 28, 2016. January 10, 2020; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after the anniversary date of the Annual Meeting, notice by the stockholder must be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such 2020 annual meeting of stockholders and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company.
The Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20172020 annual meeting of stockholders will grant authority to the persons named in the proxy card to exercise their voting discretion with respect to any proposal of which the Company does not receive notice by January 27, 2017. All proposals for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials and notices of proposalsFebruary 9, 2020. Such stockholder notice should be sent to the Chairman of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee, c/o Secretary, Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., P.O. Box 537012, Sacramento,222 N. Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 500, El Segundo, California 95853-7012.90245. Proposals not meeting the advance notice requirements in the Bylaws will not be entertained at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders. A copy of the full text of the relevant bylaw provisions may be obtained from the Company’s filings with the SEC or on our website at www.AerojetRocketdyne.com/corporate-governance.

52


It is important that proxies be voted promptly; therefore, stockholders who do not expect to attendparticipate in personthe meeting are urged to vote by either (a) using the toll-free telephone number shown on your proxy card, (b) casting your vote electronically at the website listed on your proxy card, or (c) if you have requested a full set of proxy materials to be sent to you, completing, signing, dating and promptly returning the accompanying proxy card in the enclosed envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Kathleen E. ReddArjun L. Kampani
KATHLEEN E. REDDARJUN L. KAMPANI
Vice President,
Chief Financial OfficerGeneral Counsel and Assistant Secretary
March 18, 201626, 2019


5369



APPENDIX A - USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

The Proxy Statement Summary and the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) sections of this Proxy Statement contain non-GAAP financial measures. The tables in this appendix reconcile the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).
About Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as a substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures do not reflect a comprehensive system of accounting, and may differ from non-GAAP financial measures with the same or similar names that are used by other companies.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We provide the Non-GAAP financial measures of our performance called Adjusted EBITDAP, Adjusted Net Income, and Adjusted EPS. We use these metrics to measure our operating and total performance. We believe that for Management and investors to effectively compare core performance from period to period, the metrics should exclude items that are not indicative of, or are unrelated to, results from our ongoing business operations such as retirement benefits (pension and postretirement benefits), significant non-cash expenses, the impacts of financing decisions on earnings, and items incurred outside the ordinary, on-going and customary course of our business. Accordingly, we define Adjusted EBITDAP as GAAP net income (loss) adjusted to exclude interest expense, interest income, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, retirement benefits net of amounts that are recoverable under our U.S. government contracts, and unusual items which we do not believe are reflective of such ordinary, on-going and customary activities. Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EPS exclude retirement benefits net of amounts that are recoverable under our U.S. government contracts and unusual items we do not believe are reflective of such ordinary, ongoing and customary activities. Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted EPS do not represent, and should not be considered an alternative to, net income (loss) or diluted EPS as determined in accordance with GAAP. For short-term annual cash incentive award purposes, certain Board approved modifications are applied to Adjusted EBITDAP where necessary.

A-1




(In Millions, except per share amounts)2018 2017
Net income (loss)$137.3
 $(9.2)
Income tax provision51.3
 96.1
Interest expense34.4
 30.9
Interest income(10.0) (3.5)
Depreciation and amortization72.3
 72.6
GAAP Retirement benefits expense57.6
 73.2
Cost Accounting Standards (“CAS”) recoverable retirement benefits expense(38.2) (36.2)
Unusual items0.2
 (1.0)
Adjusted EBITDAP$304.9
 $222.9
Exclude Board and retiree stock compensation above or below Annual Operating Plan (“AOP”)(0.1)  
Exclude stock compensation related to bonus achievement above or below AOP2.1
  
Exclude annual incentive plan bonus achievement above or below AOP1.9
  
Adjusted EBITDAP with Board approved modifications$308.8
 N/A
    
Net income (loss)$137.3
 $(9.2)
GAAP retirement benefits expense57.6
 73.2
CAS recoverable retirement benefits expense(38.2) (36.2)
Unusual items0.2
 (1.0)
Income tax impact of adjustments (1)
(5.4) (15.4)
One-time reduction in deferred tax assets due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act—
 64.6
Adjusted Net Income$151.5
 $76.0
    
Diluted EPS$1.75
 $(0.13)
Adjustments0.18
 1.15
Adjusted EPS$1.93
 $1.02
    
Diluted weighted average shares, as reported76.8
 73.0
Adjustments—
 0.1
Diluted weighted average shares, as adjusted76.8
 73.1
    
(1)The income tax impact is calculated using the federal and state statutory rates in the corresponding year.
We also provide the Non-GAAP financial measure of Free Cash Flow. Free Cash Flow is defined as cash flow from operating activities less capital expenditures. Free Cash Flow should not be considered in isolation, as a measure of residual cash flow available for discretionary purposes, or as an alternative to cash flows from operations presented in accordance with GAAP. We use Free Cash Flow both in presenting our results to stakeholders and the investment community. We use Free Cash Flow in our internal evaluation and management of the business. Management believes that this financial measure is useful because it provides supplemental information to assist investors in viewing the business using the same tools that management uses to evaluate progress in achieving our goals (including under our annual cash and long-term compensation incentive plans).
(Dollars in Millions)2018 2017
Net cash provided by operating activities$252.7
 $212.8
Capital expenditures(43.2) (29.4)
Free cash flow$209.5
 $183.4
    

A-2



APPENDIX B
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc.
2019 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan
ARTICLE 1.
Establishment, Purpose, and Duration
1.1Establishment. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”), establishes an incentive compensation plan to be known as the 2019 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (hereinafter referred to as the “Plan”), as set forth in this document.
The Plan permits the grant of Cash-Based Awards, Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares, Performance Units and Other Stock-Based Awards.
The Plan shall become effective upon stockholder approval (the “Effective Date”) and shall remain in effect as provided in Section 1.3 hereof. Upon stockholder approval of this Plan, the Plan will supersede the Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. 2018 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”) with respect to future awards and no further awards will be granted under the 2018 Plan.
1.2Purpose of the Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to promote the interests of the Company and its stockholders by strengthening the Company’s ability to attract, motivate, and retain Employees and Directors upon whose judgment, initiative, and efforts the financial success and growth of the business of the Company largely depend, and to provide an additional incentive for such individuals through stock ownership and other rights that promote and recognize the financial success and growth of the Company and create value for stockholders.
1.3Duration of the Plan. Unless sooner terminated as provided herein, the Plan shall terminate ten years from the Effective Date; provided, however, that Incentive Stock Options may not be granted under the Plan after the tenth (10th) anniversary of the date of the Board’s approval of the Plan. After the Plan is terminated, no Awards may be granted but Awards previously granted shall remain outstanding in accordance with their applicable terms and conditions and the Plan’s terms and conditions.
ARTICLE 2.
Definitions
Whenever used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below, and when the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the word shall be capitalized.
2.1“Affiliate” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Rule 12b-2 promulgated under the General Rules and Regulations of the Exchange Act.
2.2“Annual Award Limit” or “Annual Award Limits” have the meaning set forth in Section 4.3.
2.3“Award” means, individually or collectively, a grant under this Plan of Cash-Based Awards, Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares, Performance Units or Other Stock-Based Awards, in each case subject to the terms of this Plan. In the event of any inconsistency between the Plan and any Award, the terms of the Plan shall govern. In the event of any inconsistency between an employment agreement and an Award the terms of the employment agreement shall govern.
2.4“Beneficial Owner” or “Beneficial Ownership” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act.
2.5“Board” or “Board of Directors” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
2.6“Cash-Based Award” means an Award granted to a Participant as described in Article 10.
2.7“Change in Control” means a Change in Control as defined in Article 15.
2.8“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

B-1



2.9“Committee” means the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board, or any other committee designated by the Board to administer this Plan. The members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by and shall serve at the discretion of the Board. The Committee shall consist of two or more directors who are Nonemployee Directors and “Outside Directors” (as such term is defined in Section 162(m) of the Code).
2.10“Company” means Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and any successor thereto as provided in Article 18 herein.
2.11“Director” means a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and/or any of its Affiliates and/or Subsidiaries.
2.12“Effective Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 1.1.
2.13“Employee” means any employee of the Company, its Affiliates and/or Subsidiaries. For purposes of Incentive Stock Options, the individual must be an employee under Code Section 3401 and the Regulations thereunder.
2.14“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, or any successor act thereto.
2.15“Evidence of Award” means an agreement, certificate, resolution or other type or form of writing or other evidence approved by the Committee which sets forth the terms and conditions of an Award. An Evidence of Award may be in any electronic medium, may be limited to a notation on the books and records of the Company and, with the approval of the Committee, need not be signed by a representative of the Company or a Participant.
2.16“Fair Market Value” or “FMV” means the last sales price reported for the Shares on the applicable date as reported on the principal national securities exchange in the United States on which it is then traded or The NASDAQ Stock Market (if the Shares are so listed), or, if such date is not a trading day, the last prior day on which the Shares were so traded; or if not so listed, the mean between the closing bid and asked prices of publicly traded Shares in the over-the-counter market, or, if such bid and asked prices shall not be available, as reported by any nationally recognized quotation service selected by the Company, or as determined by the Committee in a manner consistent with the provisions of the Code. If, however, the required accounting standards used to account for equity Awards granted to Participants are substantially modified subsequent to the Effective Date of the Plan such that fair value accounting for such Awards becomes required, the Committee shall have the ability to determine an Award’s FMV based on the relevant facts and circumstances, but in a manner consistent with the Section 409A Rules.
2.17“Full Value Award” means an Award other than in the form of an Option or SAR, and which is settled by the issuance of Shares.
2.18“Freestanding SAR” means an SAR that is granted independently of any Options, as described in Article 7.
2.19“Grant Price” means the price established at the time of grant of a SAR pursuant to Article 7, used to determine whether there is any payment due upon exercise of the SAR.
2.20“Incentive Stock Option” means an Option that is intended to qualify as an “incentive stock option” under Section 422 of the Code or any successor provision.
2.21“Insider” shall mean an individual who is, on the relevant date, an officer, Director, or more than ten percent (10%) Beneficial Owner of any class of the Company’s equity securities that is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, as determined by the Board in accordance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
2.22“Nonemployee Director” has the same meaning set forth in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, or any successor definition adopted by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
2.23“Nonqualified Stock Option” means an Option that is not intended to meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Code, or that otherwise does not meet such requirements.
2.24“Option” means the right to purchase Shares granted to a Participant in accordance with Article 6. Options granted under this Plan may be Nonqualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Option or a combination thereof.
2.25“Option Price” means the price at which a Share may be purchased by a Participant pursuant to an Option.
2.26 “Other Stock-Based Award” means an equity-based or equity-related Award not otherwise described by the terms of this Plan, granted pursuant to Article 10.
2.27“Participant” means any eligible person as set forth in Article 5 to whom an Award is granted.

B-2



2.28“Performance Measures” means measures as described in Article 11 on which the performance goals are based and which are approved by the Company’s stockholders pursuant to this Plan in order to qualify Awards as Performance-Based Compensation.
2.29“Performance Period” means the period of time during which the performance goals must be met in order to determine the degree of payout and/or vesting with respect to an Award.
2.30“Performance Share” means an Award granted to a Participant, as described in Article 9.
2.31“Performance Unit” means an Award granted to a Participant, as described in Article 9.
2.32“Period of Restriction” means the period when Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units are subject to a “substantial risk of forfeiture” within the meaning of Section 83 of the Code (based on the passage of time, the achievement of performance goals, or upon the occurrence of other events as determined by the Committee, in its discretion), as provided in Article 8.
2.33“Person” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act and used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) thereof, including a “group” as defined in Section 13(d) thereof.
2.34“Plan” means the Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. 2019 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan.
2.35“Plan Year” means the Company’s fiscal year.
2.36“Prior Plans” means the 2018 Plan and the Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2009 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan.
2.37“Restricted Stock” means Shares granted or sold to a Participant pursuant to Article 8 as to which the Period of Restriction has not lapsed.
2.38“Restricted Stock Unit” means a unit granted or sold to a Participant pursuant to Article 8 as to which the Period of Restriction has not lapsed.
2.39“Section 409A Rules” means the provisions of Section 409A of the Code and Treasury Regulations and other Internal Revenue Service guidance promulgated thereunder.
2.40“Share” means a share of common stock of the Company, $.10 par value per share.
2.41“Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means an Award, designated as a SAR and granted pursuant to the terms of Article 7 herein.
2.42“Subsidiary” means a corporation, company or other entity (i) more than 50 percent (50%) of whose outstanding shares or securities (representing the right to vote for the election of directors or other managing authority) are, or (ii) which does not have outstanding shares or securities (as may be the case in a partnership, joint venture or unincorporated association), but more than 50 percent (50%) of whose ownership interest representing the right generally to make decisions for such other entity is, now or hereafter, owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Company, except that for purposes of determining whether any person may be a Participant for purposes of any grant of Incentive Stock Options, “Subsidiary” means any corporation in which at the time the Company owns or controls, directly or indirectly, more than 50 percent (50%) of the total combined voting power represented by all classes of stock issued by such corporation.
2.43“Substitute Awards” means Awards granted or Shares issued by the Company in assumption of, or in substitution or exchange for, Awards previously granted, or the right or obligation to make future Awards, by an entity acquired by the Company or with which the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate thereof combine.
2.44Termination of Employment” or a similar reference means the event where the Employee is no longer an Employee of the Company or of any Subsidiary, including but not limited to where the employing Corporation ceases to be a Subsidiary. With respect to any Participant who is not an Employee, “Termination of Employment” shall mean cessation of the performance of services. With respect to any Award that provides “non-qualified deferred compensation” within the meaning of the Section 409A Rules, “Termination of Employment” shall mean a “separation from service” as defined under the Section 409A Rules.

B-3



ARTICLE 3.
Administration
3.1General. The Committee shall be responsible for administering the Plan, subject to this Article 3 and the other provisions of the Plan. The act or determination of a majority of the Committee shall be the act or determination of the Committee and any decision reduced to writing and signed by all of the members of the Committee shall be fully effective as if it had been made by a majority at a meeting duly held. The Committee may employ attorneys, consultants, accountants, agents, and other persons, any of whom may be an Employee, and the Committee, the Company, and its officers and Directors shall be entitled to rely upon the advice, opinions, or valuations of any such persons. All actions taken and all interpretations and determinations made by the Committee shall be final and binding upon the Participants, the Company, and all other interested persons, and shall be given the maximum deference permissible by law.
3.2Authority of the Committee. The Committee shall have full and exclusive discretionary power to interpret the terms and the intent of the Plan and any Evidence of Award or other agreement or document ancillary to or in connection with the Plan, to determine eligibility for Awards and to adopt such rules, regulations, forms, instruments, and guidelines for administering the Plan as the Committee may deem necessary or proper. Such authority shall include, but not be limited to, selecting Award recipients, establishing all Award terms and conditions, including the terms and conditions set forth in an Evidence of Award, correcting any defects, supplying any omissions or reconciling any inconsistencies in the Plan or any Award, in the manner and to the extent it shall deem feasible to carry out the purposes of the Plan and, subject to Article 16, adopting modifications and amendments to the Plan or any Evidence of Award, including without limitation, any that are necessary to comply with the laws of the countries and other jurisdictions in which the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries operate. In the event that for any reason the Committee is unable to act or if the Committee at the time of any grant, Award or other acquisition under the Plan does not consist of two or more Nonemployee Directors, or if there shall be no such Committee, then the Plan shall be administered by the Board, and references herein to the Committee except to the extent that the grant or exercise of such authority would cause any Award or transaction to become subject to (or lose an exemption under) the short swing profit recovery rules of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, shall be deemed to be references to the Board.
3.3Delegation of Authority. To the extent not prohibited by law, the Committee may delegate its authority hereunder to one or more of its members or other persons, except that no such delegation shall be permitted with respect to Awards to Participants who are subject to Section 16 of the Act. Any person to whom the Committee delegates its authority pursuant to this Section 3(d) may receive Awards only if such Awards are granted directly by the Administrator without delegation. The Committee may act through subcommittees, including for purposes of perfecting exemptions under Rule 16b-3, in which case the subcommittee shall be subject to and have the authority under the charter applicable to the Committee and the acts of the subcommittee shall be deemed to be the acts of the Committee hereunder.
ARTICLE 4.
Shares Subject to the Plan and Maximum Awards
4.1Number of Shares Available for Awards.
(a) Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.4 herein, the maximum number of Shares available for issuance to Participants under the Plan (the “Share Authorization”) shall be (i) four million, four hundred fifty-three thousand twenty-two (4,453,022) Shares (including 3,583,022 Shares that were available for issuance under the 2018 Plan as of March 13, 2019), plus (A) Shares attributable to awards under the Prior Plans forfeited after March 13, 2019 and prior to the Effective Date, less (B) Shares attributable to new awards granted under the 2018 Plan after March 13, 2019 and prior to the Effective Date; plus (ii) any Shares subject to outstanding awards under the Prior Plans as of the Effective Date that, on or after the Effective Date, cease for any reason to be subject to such awards (other than by reason of exercise or settlement of the awards to the extent they are exercised for or settled in vested and nonforfeitable Shares). All of the Shares available for issuance under this Plan may be Incentive Stock Options.
(b) Of the Shares reserved for issuance under Section 4.1(a) of the Plan, all of the reserved Shares may be issued pursuant to Full Value Awards.

B-4



(c) For purposes of this Section, to the extent any SAR is settled, in whole or in part, in cash, the number of shares available for issuance under this Section shall not be reduced.
4.2Share Usage. Shares covered by an Award shall only be counted as used to the extent they are actually issued. Any Shares related to Awards which terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation, or otherwise without the issuance of such Shares, are settled in cash in lieu of Shares, or are exchanged with the Committee’s permission, prior to the issuance of Shares, for Awards not involving Shares, shall be available again for grant under the Plan. Moreover, if the Option Price of any Option granted under the Plan or the tax withholding requirements with respect to any Award granted under the Plan are satisfied by tendering Shares to the Company (by either actual delivery or by attestation), or if an SAR is exercised, only the number of Shares issued, net of the Shares tendered, if any, will be deemed delivered for purposes of determining the maximum number of Shares available for delivery under the Plan and any Shares so tendered shall again be available for issuance under the Plan. The Shares available for issuance under the Plan may be authorized and unissued Shares, treasury Shares or a combination thereof. Substitute Awards shall not alter the Shares available for issuance under the Plan.
4.3Nonemployee Director Annual Award Limits. Subject to the terms of Section 4.1 hereof, the following limits (each an “Annual Award Limit,” and, collectively, “Annual Award Limits”) shall apply to grants of such Awards under the Plan: The maximum aggregate dollar value of equity-based Awards (based on the grant date fair value of such Awards) and cash compensation granted under this Plan or otherwise during any Plan Year to any one Nonemployee Director shall not exceed $400,000; provided, however, that for any Nonemployee Director who is designated as Chairman of the Board of Directors or Lead Director, the maximum aggregate dollar value of equity-based and cash compensation granted to the Nonemployee Director may be up to two hundred percent (200%) of the foregoing limit.
4.4Adjustments in Authorized Shares. In the event of any corporate event or transaction (including, but not limited to, a change in the Shares of the Company or the capitalization of the Company) such as a merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, separation, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split up, spin-off, or other distribution of stock or property of the Company, combination of Shares, exchange of Shares, dividend in kind, or other like change in capital structure or distribution (other than normal cash dividends) to stockholders of the Company, or any similar corporate event or transaction, the Committee, in its sole discretion, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of Participants’ rights under the Plan, shall substitute or adjust, as applicable, the number and kind of Shares that may be issued under the Plan or under particular forms of Awards, the number and kind of Shares subject to outstanding Awards, the Option Price or Grant Price applicable to outstanding Awards, the Annual Award Limits, and other value determinations applicable to outstanding Awards.
The Committee, in its sole discretion, may also make appropriate adjustments in the terms of any Awards under the Plan to reflect or related to such changes or distributions and to modify any other terms of outstanding Awards, including modifications of performance goals and changes in the length of Performance Periods. The determination of the Committee as to the foregoing adjustments, if any, shall be conclusive and binding on Participants under the Plan.
Subject to the provisions of Article 16, without affecting the number of Shares reserved or available hereunder, the Committee may authorize the issuance or assumption of benefits under this Plan in connection with any merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, or reorganization upon such terms and conditions as it may deem appropriate, subject to compliance with the rules under Section 422 of the Code and the Section 409A Rules, where applicable.
ARTICLE 5.
Eligibility and Participation
5.1Eligibility. Individuals eligible to participate in this Plan include all Employees and Nonemployee Directors.
5.2Actual Participation. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee may, from time to time, select from all eligible individuals, those to whom Awards shall be granted and shall determine, in its sole discretion, the nature of, any and all terms permissible by law, and the amount of each Award. In making this determination, the Committee may consider any factors it deems relevant, including without limitation, the office or position held by a Participant or the Participant’s relationship to the Company, the Participant’s degree of responsibility for and contribution to the growth and success of the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate, the Participant’s length of service, promotions and potential.

B-5



ARTICLE 6.
Options
6.1Grant of Options. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, Options may be granted to Participants in such number, and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion.
6.2Evidence of Award. Each Option grant shall be evidenced by an Evidence of Award that shall specify the Option Price, the maximum duration of the Option, the number of Shares to which the Option pertains, the conditions upon which an Option shall become vested and exercisable, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine which are not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan.
6.3Option Price. The Option Price for each grant of an Option under this Plan shall be as determined by the Committee and shall be specified in the Evidence of Award. The Option Price may not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date of grant; provided, however, that an Option granted outside the United States to a person who is a non-U.S. taxpayer may be granted with an Option Price less than the Fair Market Value of the underlying Shares on the date of grant if necessary to utilize a locally available tax advantage.
6.4Duration of Options. Except as otherwise provided in Section 422 of the Code, each Option granted to a Participant shall expire at such time as the Committee shall determine at the time of grant and specify in the Evidence of Award; provided, however, that no Option shall be exercisable later than the seventh (7th) anniversary date of its grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for Options granted to Participants outside the United States who are non-U.S. taxpayers, the Committee has the authority to grant Options that have a term greater than seven (7) years.
6.5Exercise of Options. Options granted under this Article 6 shall be exercisable at such times and be subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Committee shall in each instance approve and specify in the Evidence of Award, which terms and restrictions need not be the same for each grant or for each Participant. If the exercise period for an Option, other than its original terms, would expire when the Participant’s exercise would violate federal, state, local or foreign law, the Committee shall extend the exercise period until 30 days after the first date the exercise would no longer violate applicable law.
6.6Payment. Options granted under this Article 6 shall be exercised by the delivery of a notice of exercise to the Company or an agent designated by the Company in a form specified or accepted by the Committee, or by complying with any alternative procedures which may be authorized by the Committee, setting forth the number of Shares with respect to which the Option is to be exercised, accompanied by full payment for the Shares.
A condition of the issuance of the Shares as to which an Option shall be exercised shall be the payment of the Option Price. The Option Price of any Option shall be payable to the Company in full either: (a) in cash or its equivalent; (b) by tendering (either by actual delivery or attestation) previously acquired Shares having an aggregate Fair Market Value at the time of exercise equal to the Option Price; (c) by a combination of (a) and (b); or (d) any other method approved or accepted by the Committee in its sole discretion, including, without limitation, if the Committee so determines, (i) a cashless (broker-assisted) exercise, or (ii) a reduction in the number of Shares that would otherwise be issued by such number of Shares having in the aggregate a Fair Market Value at the time of exercise equal to the portion of the Option Price being so paid.
Subject to any governing rules or regulations, as soon as practicable after receipt of written notification of exercise and full payment (including satisfaction of any applicable tax withholding), the Company shall deliver to the Participant evidence of book entry Shares, or upon the Participant’s request, Share certificates in an appropriate amount based upon the number of Shares purchased under the Option(s).
Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, all payments under all of the methods indicated above shall be paid in United States dollars.
6.7Restrictions on Share Transferability. The Committee may impose such restrictions on any Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Option granted under this Article 6 as it may deem advisable and specify in the Evidence of Award, including, without limitation, minimum holding period requirements, restrictions under applicable federal securities laws, under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which such Shares are then listed and/or traded, or under any blue sky or state securities laws applicable to such Shares.

B-6



6.8Termination of Employment. Each Participant’s Evidence of Award shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to exercise the Option following Termination of the Participant’s Employment with the Company, its Affiliates and Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Evidence of Award entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Options issued pursuant to this Article 6, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
6.9Transferability of Options. No Option granted under this Article 6 may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than (i) by will or by the laws of descent and distribution; (ii) by designation of beneficiary or as otherwise required by law including qualified domestic relations order; (iii) by transfer, without payment of consideration therefor by the transferee, to any one or more members of the Participant’s Immediate Family (“Immediate Family” as defined in Rule 16a-1(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any successor rule to the same effect, as in effect from time to time) (or to one or more trusts established solely for the benefit of such Participant and/or one or more members of the Participant’s Immediate Family or to one or more partnerships in which the only partners are such Participant and/or members of the Participant’s Immediate Family); provided, however, that (A) no such transfer shall be effective unless reasonable prior notice thereof is delivered to the Company and such transfer is thereafter effected in accordance with any terms and conditions that shall have been made applicable thereto by the Company or the Board and (B) any such transferee shall be subject to the same terms and conditions hereunder as the Participant. Further, all Options granted to a Participant under this Article 6 shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant or his or her authorized representative or transferee as permitted by the preceding sentence. With respect to those Options, if any, that are permitted to be transferred to another person, references in the Plan to exercise or payment of the Option Price by the Participant shall be deemed to include, as determined by the Committee, the Participant’s permitted transferee.
6.10Incentive Stock Option Limits. Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to Participants who are employees of the Company, or of any subsidiary corporation (within the meaning of Section 424 of the Code) of the Company on the grant date. Any person who is not an Employee of an Incentive Stock Option qualifying corporation on the grant date of an Option to such person shall receive a Nonqualified Stock Option. The aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the grant date of the Incentive Stock Option) of the Shares with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by any Participant during any calendar year (under all plans of the Company (or of any parent or subsidiary corporation (within the meaning of Section 424 of the Code) of the Company)) shall not exceed $100,000 or such other amount as may subsequently be specified by the Code and/or applicable regulations; provided that if such limitation is exceeded, any Options or Shares in excess of such limitation shall be deemed to be Nonqualified Stock Options. If an Option is treated as an Incentive Stock Option in part and a Nonqualified Stock Option in part by reason of the limitation set forth in this subsection, the Participant may designate which portion of such Option the Participant is exercising. In the absence of any such designation, the Participant shall be deemed to have exercised the Incentive Stock Option portion of the Option first. Upon exercise, Shares issued pursuant to such Option shall be separately identified. Incentive Stock Options shall contain such other provisions as the Committee shall deem advisable but shall in all events be consistent with and contain or be deemed to contain all provisions required in order to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code. To the extent that Incentive Stock Options are not exercised within the time required under the Code after the Participant’s termination of employment with the Company and its Affiliates, the Incentive Stock Options will automatically convert to Nonqualified Stock Options. The Participant may thereafter exercise the Nonqualified Stock Options for the period provided in the Award or the Plan.
6.11    Dividends. In no event will dividends or dividend equivalents be paid currently with respect to Options.
ARTICLE 7.
Stock Appreciation Rights
7.1Grant of SARs. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, SARs, including Freestanding SARs, may be granted to Participants at any time and from time to time as shall be determined by the Committee.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Committee shall have complete discretion in determining the number of SARs granted to each Participant and, consistent with the provisions of the Plan, in determining the terms and conditions pertaining to such SARs.
The Grant Price for each grant of a Freestanding SAR shall be determined by the Committee and shall be specified in the Evidence of Award. The Grant Price may include (but not be limited to) a Grant Price based on one

B-7



hundred percent (100%) of the FMV of the Shares on the date of grant, a Grant Price that is set at a premium to the FMV of the Shares on the date of grant, or is indexed to the FMV of the Shares on the date of grant, with the index determined by the Committee, in its discretion to the extent consistent with the Section 409A Rules.
7.2SAR Agreement. Each SAR Award shall be evidenced by an Evidence of Award that shall specify the Grant Price, the term of the SAR, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine.
7.3Term of SAR. The term of an SAR granted under the Plan shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, and except as determined otherwise by the Committee and specified in the SAR Evidence of Award, no SAR shall be exercisable later than the seventh (7th) anniversary date of its grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for SARs granted to Participants who are non-U.S. taxpayers, the Committee has the authority to grant SARs that have a term greater than seven (7) years.
7.4Exercise of Freestanding SARs. Freestanding SARs may be exercised upon whatever terms and conditions the Committee, in its sole discretion, imposes and specifies in the Evidence of Award.
7.5Payment of SAR Amount. Upon the exercise of an SAR, a Participant shall be entitled to receive payment from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying:
(a)The excess of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise over the Grant Price; by
(b)The number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised.
At the discretion of the Committee, the payment upon SAR exercise may be in cash, Shares, or any combination thereof, or in any other manner approved by the Committee in its sole discretion. The Committee’s determination regarding the form of SAR payout shall be set forth in the Evidence of Award pertaining to the grant of the SAR.
7.6Termination of Employment. Each Evidence of Award shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to exercise the SAR following the Participant’s Termination of Employment with the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Evidence of Award entered into with Participants, need not be uniform among all SARs issued pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
7.7Nontransferability of SARs. No SAR granted under the Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than (i) by will or by the laws of descent and distribution; (ii) by designation of beneficiary or as otherwise required by law; (iii) by transfer, without payment of consideration therefor by the transferee, to any one or more members of the Participant’s Immediate Family (“Immediate Family” as defined in Rule 16a-1(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any successor rule to the same effect, as in effect from time to time) (or to one or more trusts established solely for the benefit of such Participant and/or one or more members of the Participant’s Immediate Family or to one or more partnerships in which the only partners are such Participant and/or members of the Participants Immediate Family); provided, however, that (A) no such transfer shall be effective unless reasonable prior notice thereof is delivered to the Company and such transfer is thereafter effected in accordance with any terms and conditions that shall have been made applicable thereto by the Company or the Board and (B) any such transferee shall be subject to the same terms and conditions hereunder as the Participant. Further, all SARs granted to a Participant under the Plan shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant or an authorized representative or transferee as permitted by the preceding sentence. With respect to those SARs, if any, that are permitted to be transferred to another person, references in the Plan to exercise of the SAR by the Participant or payment of any amount to the Participant shall be deemed to include, as determined by the Committee, the Participant’s permitted transferee.
7.8Other Restrictions. The Committee shall impose such other conditions and/or restrictions on any Shares received upon exercise of a SAR granted pursuant to the Plan as it may deem advisable or desirable. These restrictions may include, but shall not be limited to, a requirement that the Participant hold the Shares received upon exercise of a SAR for a specified period of time.
7.9    Dividends. In no event will dividends or dividend equivalents be paid currently with respect to SARs.

B-8



ARTICLE 8.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
8.1Grant of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Shares of Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units to Participants in such amounts as the Committee shall determine. Restricted Stock Units shall represent the right of a Participant to receive payment upon the lapse of the Period of Restriction.
8.2Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. Each Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Unit grant shall be evidenced by an Evidence of Award that shall specify the Period(s) of Restriction, the number of Shares of Restricted Stock or the number of Restricted Stock Units granted, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine.
8.3Transferability. Except as provided in this Plan or an Evidence of Award, the Shares of Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units granted herein may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until the end of the applicable Period of Restriction established by the Committee and specified in the Evidence of Award (and in the case of Restricted Stock Units until the date of delivery or other payment), or upon earlier satisfaction of any other conditions, as specified by the Committee, in its sole discretion, and set forth in the Evidence of Award or otherwise at any time by the Committee. All rights with respect to the Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units granted to a Participant under the Plan shall be available during his or her lifetime only to such Participant, except as otherwise provided in an Evidence of Award or at any time by the Committee.
8.4Other Restrictions. The Committee shall impose such other conditions and/or restrictions on any Shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to the Plan as it may deem advisable including, without limitation, a requirement that Participants pay a stipulated purchase price for each Share of Restricted Stock or each Restricted Stock Unit, restrictions based upon the achievement of specific performance goals, time-based restrictions on vesting following the attainment of the performance goals, time-based restrictions, and/or restrictions under applicable laws or under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which such Shares are listed or traded, or holding requirements or sale restrictions placed on the Shares by the Company upon vesting of such Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units.
In the event that the vesting date occurs on a date which is not a trading day on the principal securities exchange on which the Shares are then traded, the Fair Market Value on the last prior trading date will be utilized for cost basis.
To the extent deemed appropriate by the Committee, the Company may retain the certificates representing Shares of Restricted Stock in the Company’s possession until such time as all conditions and/or restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied or lapse.
Except as otherwise provided in this Article 8, Shares of Restricted Stock covered by each Restricted Stock Award shall become freely transferable by the Participant after all conditions and restrictions applicable to such Shares have been satisfied or lapse (including satisfaction of any applicable tax withholding obligations), and Restricted Stock Units shall be paid in cash, Shares, or a combination of cash and Shares as the Committee, in its sole discretion shall determine.
8.5Certificate Legend. In addition to any legends placed on certificates pursuant to Section 8.4, each certificate representing Shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Plan may bear a legend as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.
8.6Voting and Dividend Rights. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee and set forth in a Participant’s Evidence of Award, to the extent permitted or required by law, as determined by the Committee, Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder may be granted the right to exercise full voting rights with respect to those Shares during the Period of Restriction. A Participant shall have no voting rights with respect to any Restricted Stock Units granted hereunder. In no event will dividends or dividend equivalents be paid currently with respect to unvested Awards of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units.
8.7Termination of Employment. To the extent consistent with the Section 409A Rules, each Evidence of Award shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to retain Restricted Stock and/or Restricted Stock Units following the Participant’s Termination of Employment with the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall

B-9



be included in the Evidence of Award entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units issued pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
ARTICLE 9.
Performance Units/Performance Shares
9.1Grant of Performance Units/Performance Shares. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Performance Units and/or Performance Shares to Participants in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine.
9.2Value of Performance Units/Performance Shares. Each Performance Unit shall have an initial value that is established by the Committee at the time of grant. Each Performance Share shall have an initial value equal to the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant. The Committee shall set performance goals in its discretion as described in Section 11.4 which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the value and/or number of Performance Units/Performance Shares that will be paid out to the Participant.
9.3Earning of Performance Units/Performance Shares. Subject to the terms of this Plan, after the applicable Performance Period has ended, the holder of Performance Units/Performance Shares shall be entitled to receive payout on the value and number of Performance Units/Performance Shares earned by the Participant over the Performance Period, to be determined as a function of the extent to which the corresponding performance goals have been achieved.
9.4Form and Timing of Payment of Performance Units/Performance Shares. Payment of earned Performance Units/Performance Shares shall be as determined by the Committee and as evidenced in the Evidence of Award. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may pay earned Performance Units/Performance Shares in the form of cash or in Shares (or in a combination thereof) equal to the value of the earned Performance Units/Performance Shares at the close of the applicable Performance Period, or as soon as practicable after the end of the Performance Period. Any Shares may be granted subject to any restrictions deemed appropriate by the Committee. The determination of the Committee with respect to the form of payout of such Awards shall be set forth in the Evidence of Award pertaining to the grant of the Award.
9.5Dividends. In no event will dividends or dividend equivalents be paid currently with respect to unvested Performance Units or Performance Shares.
9.6Termination of Employment. To the extent consistent with the Section 409A Rules, each Evidence of Award shall set forth the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to retain Performance Units and/or Performance Shares following the Participant’s Termination of Employment with the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Evidence of Award entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Awards of Performance Units or Performance Shares issued pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
9.7Nontransferability. Except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s Evidence of Award or otherwise at any time by the Committee, Performance Units/Performance Shares may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or designation of beneficiary or as otherwise required by law. Further, except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s Evidence of Award or otherwise at any time by the Committee, a Participant’s rights under the Plan shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant or his or her authorized representative.
ARTICLE 10.
Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards
10.1Grant of Cash-Based Awards. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Cash-Based Awards to Participants in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee may determine.
10.2Other Stock-Based Awards. The Committee may grant other types of equity-based or equity-related Awards not otherwise described by the terms of this Plan (including the grant or offer for sale of unrestricted Shares) in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions, as the Committee shall determine. Such Awards may involve

B-10



the transfer of actual Shares to Participants, or payment in cash or otherwise of amounts based on the value of Shares and may include, without limitation, Awards designed to comply with or take advantage of the applicable local laws of jurisdictions other than the United States.
10.3Value of Cash-Based and Other Stock-Based Awards. Each Cash-Based Award shall specify a payment amount or payment range as determined by the Committee. Each Other Stock-Based Award shall be expressed in terms of Shares or units based on Shares, as determined by the Committee.
10.4Payment of Cash-Based Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards. Payment, if any, with respect to a Cash-Based Award or an Other Stock-Based Award shall be made in accordance with the terms of the Award, in cash, Shares or a combination thereof, as the Committee determines.
10.5Termination of Employment. The Committee shall determine the extent to which the Participant shall have the right to receive Cash-Based Awards following the Participant’s Termination of Employment with the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, such provisions may be included in an agreement entered into with each Participant, but need not be uniform among all Awards of Cash-Based Awards issued pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.
10.6Nontransferability. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, neither Cash-Based Awards nor Other Stock-Based Awards may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or designation of beneficiary. Further, except as otherwise provided by the Committee, a Participant’s rights under the Plan, if exercisable, shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Participant or his or her authorized representative. With respect to those Cash-Based Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards, if any, that are permitted to be transferred to another person, references in the Plan to exercise or payment of such Awards by or to the Participant shall be deemed to include, as determined by the Committee, the Participant’s permitted transferee.
10.7    Dividends. In no event will dividends or dividend equivalents be paid currently with respect to Other Stock-Based Awards.
ARTICLE 11.
Performance Measures
11.1Performance Measures. The Committee may specify the performance goals applicable to an Award, which may include any one or more of the following Performance Measures:
(a)Net earnings or net income (before or after taxes and interest/investments);
(b)Earnings per share;
(c)Earnings per share growth;
(d)Net sales growth;
(e)Net earnings or net income growth (before or after taxes and interest/investment);
(f)Net operating profit;
(g)Return measures (including return on assets, capital, equity, or sales);
(h)Cash flow (including operating cash flow , free cash flow, and cash flow return on capital);
(i)Earnings before or after taxes, interest, depreciation, amortization and/or retirement benefit expense;
(j)Gross or operating margins or growth thereof;
(k)Productivity ratios;
(l)Share price (including growth measures and total stockholder return);
(m)Expense targets;

B-11



(n)Operating efficiency;
(o)Customer satisfaction;
(p)Revenue or Revenue growth;
(q)Operating profit growth;
(r)Working capital targets;
(s)Economic value added;
(t)Real estate management objectives;
(u)Sale or disposition of assets;
(v)Acquisition of key assets; and
(w)Any other measure or metric the Committee deems appropriate.
Any Performance Measure(s) may be used to measure the performance of the Company, Subsidiary, and/or Affiliate as a whole or any business unit of the Company, Subsidiary, and/or Affiliate or any combination thereof, as the Committee may deem appropriate, or any of the above Performance Measures as compared to the performance of a group of comparable companies, or published or special index that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate, or the Company may select Performance Measure (l) above as compared to various stock market indices. The Committee also has the authority to provide for accelerated vesting of any Award based on the achievement of performance goals pursuant to the Performance Measures specified in this Article 11.
11.2Evaluation of Performance. The Committee may provide in any such Award that any evaluation of performance may include or exclude any of the following events that occurs during a Performance Period: (a) asset write-downs, (b) litigation or claim judgments or settlements, (c) the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles, or other laws or provisions affecting reported results, (d) any reorganization and restructuring programs, (e) extraordinary nonrecurring items as described in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 and/or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing in the Company’s annual report to stockholders for the applicable year, (f) acquisitions or divestitures and (g) foreign exchange gains and losses.
ARTICLE 12.
Beneficiary Designation
Each Participant under the Plan may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named contingently or successively) to whom any benefit under the Plan is to be paid in case of his or her death before he or she receives any or all of such benefit. Each such designation shall revoke all prior designations by the same Participant, shall be in a form prescribed by the Committee, and will be effective only when filed by the Participant in writing with the Company during the Participant’s lifetime. In the absence of any such designation, benefits remaining unpaid at the Participant’s death shall be paid to the Participant’s estate.
ARTICLE 13.
Deferrals
To the extent permitted by the Section 409A Rules, the Committee may permit or require a Participant to defer such Participant’s receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of Shares that would otherwise be due to such Participant by virtue of the exercise of an Option or SAR, the lapse or waiver of restrictions with respect to Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units, or the satisfaction of any requirements or performance goals with respect to Performance Shares, Performance Units, Cash-Based Awards or Other Stock-Based Awards. If any such deferral election is required or permitted, the Committee shall, in its sole discretion, establish rules and procedures for such payment deferrals, consistent with the Section 409A Rules.

B-12




ARTICLE 14.
Rights of Participants
14.1Employment. Nothing in the Plan or an Evidence of Award shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries, to terminate any Participant’s employment or service on the Board at any time or for any reason not prohibited by law, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue his or her employment or service for any specified period of time.
Neither an Award nor any benefits arising under this Plan shall constitute an employment contract with the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries and, accordingly, subject to Articles 3 and 16, this Plan and the benefits hereunder may be terminated at any time in the sole and exclusive discretion of the Committee without giving rise to any liability on the part of the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries.
14.2Participation. No individual shall have the right to be selected to receive an Award under this Plan, or, having been so selected, to be selected to receive a future Award.
14.3Rights as a Stockholder. Except as otherwise provided herein, a Participant shall have none of the rights of a stockholder with respect to Shares covered by any Award until the Participant becomes the record holder of such Shares.
ARTICLE 15.
Change in Control
15.1Change in Control. For purposes of this Plan, a “Change in Control” shall mean the occurrence during the term of any of the following events:
(a)All or substantially all (meaning having a total gross fair market value at least equal to 50.1% of the total gross fair market value of all of the Company’s assets immediately before such acquisition or acquisitions) of the assets of the Company are acquired by a Person (during a twelve month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such Person); or
(b)The Company is merged, consolidated, or reorganized into or with another corporation or entity during a twelve-month period with the result that upon the conclusion of the transaction less than 50.1% of the outstanding securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors or other capital interests of the surviving, resulting or acquiring corporation are beneficially owned (as that term is defined in Rule 13-d 3 under the Exchange Act) by the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to the completion of the transaction.
15.2    Vesting Upon Change in Control. Except as provided in an Evidence of Award, all Shares covered by Awards to a Participant (including both shares that vest based on continued employment and shares that vest based on attainment of performance goals) shall become immediately vested in full, regardless of performance, and nonforfeitable upon the occurrence of a Change in Control that shall occur while the Participant is an Employee or Nonemployee Director of the Company.
ARTICLE 16.
Amendment, Modification, Suspension, and Termination
16.1Amendment, Modification, Suspension, and Termination. Subject to Section 16.3 and 16.4, the Committee may, at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, modify, suspend, or terminate the Plan and any Evidence of Award in whole or in part; provided, however, that (a) without the prior approval of the Company’s stockholders, Options issued under the Plan will not be repriced, replaced, or regranted through cancellation; and (b) no amendment of the Plan shall be made without stockholder approval if stockholder approval is required by law, regulation, or stock exchange rule.
16.2Adjustment of Awards Upon the Occurrence of Certain Unusual or Nonrecurring Events. The Committee may make adjustments, consistent with Section 162(m) of the Code and the Section 409A Rules, in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events (including, without limitation, the events described in Section 4.4 hereof) affecting the Company or the financial statements of the Company or of changes in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles, whenever the Committee

B-13



determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent unintended dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan. The determination of the Committee as to the foregoing adjustments, if any, shall be conclusive and binding on Participants under the Plan.
16.3Awards Previously Granted. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, no termination, amendment, suspension, or modification of the Plan or an Evidence of Award shall adversely affect in any material way any Award previously granted under the Plan, without the written consent of the Participant holding such Award except as required under Section 16.4 or otherwise under the tax laws.
16.4Compliance with the Section 409A Rules. It is the intention of the Board that the Plan comply strictly with the Section 409A Rules and the Committee shall exercise its discretion in granting Awards hereunder (and the terms of such grants), accordingly. The Plan and any grant of an Award hereunder may be amended from time to time as may be necessary or appropriate to comply with the Section 409A Rules.
ARTICLE 17.
Withholding
17.1Tax Withholding. The Company shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, the minimum statutory amount (or, if and when the Company adopts any applicable accounting standard allowing for greater Share withholding, up to such withholding rate that will not cause an adverse accounting consequence or cost) to satisfy federal, state, and local taxes, domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of this Plan.
17.2Share Withholding. With respect to withholding required upon the exercise of Options, SARs or any other taxable event arising as a result of an Award granted hereunder, Participants may elect, subject to the approval of the Committee, to satisfy the withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by having the Company withhold Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date the tax is to be determined equal to the minimum statutory total tax that could be imposed on the transaction (or, if and when the Company adopts any applicable accounting standard allowing for greater Share withholding, up to such withholding rate that will not cause an adverse accounting consequence or cost). All such elections shall be irrevocable, made in writing, and signed by the Participant, and shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate. With respect to withholding required upon the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock or upon the achievement of performance goals related to Performance Shares, Participants shall be required to satisfy the withholding requirement by having the Company withhold Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date the tax is to be determined equal to the minimum statutory total tax that could be imposed on the transaction (or, if and when the Company adopts any applicable accounting standard allowing for greater Share withholding, up to such withholding rate that will not cause an adverse accounting consequence or cost).
17.3Section 83(b) Election. In any case which a Participant makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code to include in gross income in the year of the transfer the amount specified in Section 83(b) of the Code, the Participant shall notify the Company of such election within ten (10) days of filing notice of the election with the Internal Revenue Service, in addition to any filing or notification requirements pursuant to regulations under Section 83(b) of the Code.
17.4Disqualifying Disposition. If the Option granted to a Participant hereunder is an Incentive Stock Option, and if the Participant sells or otherwise disposes of any of the Shares acquired pursuant to the Incentive Stock Option on or before the later of (i) the date two years after the grant date, or (ii) the date one year after the date of exercise, the Participant shall immediately notify the Company of such disposition.
ARTICLE 18.
Successors
All obligations of the Company under the Plan with respect to Awards granted hereunder shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company.

B-14



ARTICLE 19.
General Provisions
19.1Forfeiture Events.
(a)The Committee may specify in an Evidence of Award that the Participant’s rights, payments, and benefits with respect to an Award shall be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions of an Award. Such events may include, but shall not be limited to, termination of employment for cause, termination of the Participant’s provision of services to the Company, Affiliate, and/or Subsidiary, violation of material Company, Affiliate, and/or Subsidiary policies, breach of noncompetition, confidentiality, or other restrictive covenants that may apply to the Participant, or other conduct by the Participant that is detrimental to the business or reputation of the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries.
(b)If the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, if the Participant knowingly or grossly negligently engaged in the misconduct, or knowingly or grossly negligently failed to prevent the misconduct, or if the Participant is one of the persons subject to automatic forfeiture under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Participant shall reimburse the Company the amount of any payment in settlement of an Award earned or accrued during the twelve-month period following the first public issuance or filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (whichever just occurred) of the financial document embodying such financial reporting requirement.
(c)In the event that the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the issuer with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, the Company will recover from any current or former executive officer of the Company or Subsidiary who received incentive-based compensation (including Options awarded as compensation) during the 3-year period preceding the date on which the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement, based on the erroneous data, in excess of what would have been paid to the executive officer under the accounting restatements. This provision is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Clawback Provision”). Accordingly, to the extent of any inconsistency between this Section and the Dodd-Frank Clawback Provision, the Dodd-Frank Clawback Provision shall prevail. Additionally, to the extent that future rules and regulations are promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other federal regulatory agency that would add, modify, or supplement the Dodd-Frank Clawback Provision, this Section shall be deemed modified to the extent required to make this Section consistent with such revised Dodd-Frank Clawback Provision.
19.2Legend. The certificates for Shares may include any legend, which the Committee deems appropriate in its sole discretion to reflect any restrictions on transfer of such Shares.
19.3Gender and Number. Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term used herein also shall include the feminine, the plural shall include the singular, and the singular shall include the plural.
19.4Severability. In the event any provision of the Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of the Plan, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included. To the extent that any provision of this Plan would prevent any Option that was intended to qualify as an Incentive Stock Option from qualifying as such, that provision shall be null and void with respect to such Option. Such provision, however, shall remain in effect for other Options and there shall be no further effect on any provision of this Plan.
19.5Requirements of Law. The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.
19.6Delivery of Title. The Company shall have no obligation to issue or deliver evidence of title for Shares issued under the Plan prior to:
(a)Obtaining any approvals from governmental agencies that the Company determines are necessary or advisable; and

B-15



(b)Completion of any registration or other qualification of the Shares under any applicable national or foreign law or ruling of any governmental body that the Company determines to be necessary or advisable.
19.7Inability to Obtain Authority. The inability of the Company to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Company’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such Shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained.
19.8Investment Representations. The Committee may require any person receiving Shares pursuant to an Award under this Plan to represent and warrant in writing that the person is acquiring the securities for his own account for investment and not with a view to, or for sale in connection with, the distribution of any part thereof.
19.9Employees Based Outside of the United States. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in order to comply with the laws in other countries in which the Company, its Affiliates, and/or its Subsidiaries operate or have Employees or Directors, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall have the power and authority to:
(a)Determine which Affiliates and Subsidiaries shall be covered by the Plan;
(b)Determine which Employees and/or Nonemployee Directors outside the United States are eligible to participate in the Plan;
(c)Modify the terms and conditions of any Award granted to Employees and/or Nonemployee Directors outside the United States to comply with applicable foreign laws;
(d)Establish subplans and modify exercise procedures and other terms and procedures, to the extent such actions may be necessary or advisable. Any subplans and modifications to Plan terms and procedures established under this Section 19.9 by the Committee shall be attached to this Plan document as appendices; and
(e)Take any action, before or after an Award is made, that it deems advisable to obtain approval or comply with any necessary local government regulatory exemptions or approvals.
Notwithstanding the above, the Committee may not take any actions hereunder, and no Awards shall be granted, that would violate applicable law.
19.10Uncertificated Shares. To the extent that the Plan provides for issuance of certificates to reflect the transfer of Shares, the transfer of such Shares may be effected on a noncertificated basis, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange.
19.11Unfunded Plan. Participants shall have no right, title, or interest whatsoever in or to any investments that the Company, and/or its Subsidiaries, and/or Affiliates may make to aid it in meeting its obligations under the Plan. Nothing contained in the Plan, and no action taken pursuant to its provisions, shall create or be construed to create a trust of any kind, or a fiduciary relationship between the Company and any Participant, beneficiary, legal representative, or any other person. To the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payments from the Company, and/or its Subsidiaries, and/or Affiliates under the Plan, such right shall be no greater than the right of an unsecured general creditor of the Company, a Subsidiary, or an Affiliate, as the case may be. All payments to be made hereunder shall be paid from the general funds of the Company, a Subsidiary, or an Affiliate, as the case may be and no special or separate fund shall be established and no segregation of assets shall be made to assure payment of such amounts except as expressly set forth in the Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, this Section is not intended to preclude the establishment by the Company of a grantor trust under Code Section 671. The Plan is not subject to ERISA.
19.12No Fractional Shares. No fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award. The Committee shall determine whether cash, Awards, or other property shall be issued or paid in lieu of fractional Shares or whether such fractional Shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.
19.13Retirement and Welfare Plans. Neither Awards made under the Plan nor Shares or cash paid pursuant to such Awards will be included as “compensation” for purposes of computing the benefits payable to any Participant under the Company’s or any Subsidiary’s or Affiliate’s retirement plans (both qualified and non-qualified) or welfare benefit plans unless such other plan expressly provides that such compensation shall be taken into account in computing a participant’s benefit.

B-16



19.14Nonexclusivity of the Plan. The adoption of this Plan shall not be construed as creating any limitations on the power of the Board or Committee to adopt such other compensation arrangements as it may deem desirable for any Participant.
19.15No Constraint on Corporate Action. Nothing in this Plan shall be construed to: (i) limit, impair, or otherwise affect the Company’s or a Subsidiary’s or an Affiliate’s right or power to make adjustments, reclassifications, reorganizations, or changes of its capital or business structure, or to merge or consolidate, or dissolve, liquidate, sell, or transfer all or any part of its business or assets; or, (ii) limit the right or power of the Company or a Subsidiary or an Affiliate to take any action which such entity deems to be necessary or appropriate.
19.16Governing Law. The Plan and each Evidence of Award shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, excluding any conflicts or choice of law rule or principle that might otherwise refer construction or interpretation of the Plan to the substantive law of another jurisdiction. Unless otherwise provided in the Evidence of Award, recipients of an Award under the Plan are deemed to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the federal or state courts of Delaware, to resolve any and all issues that may arise out of or relate to the Plan or any related Evidence of Award.
19.17No Liability of the Company. The Company and any Subsidiary or Affiliate which is in existence or hereafter comes into existence shall not be liable to a Participant or any other person as to: (i) the non-issuance or sale of Shares as to which the Company has been unable to obtain from any regulatory body having jurisdiction or authority deemed by the Company’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder; and (ii) any tax consequence expected, but not realized, by any Participant or other person due to the receipt, exercise or settlement of any Award granted hereunder.
19.18No Representations on Covenants with Respect to Tax Qualification. Although the Company may endeavor to qualify an Award for favorable tax treatment under the laws of the United States or jurisdictions outside of the United States or to avoid adverse tax treatment, the Company makes no representation to the effect and expressly disavows any covenant to maintain favorable or avoid unfavorable tax treatment, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan and the Company will have no liability to a Participant or to any other party if a payment under an Award that is intended to benefit from favorable tax treatment or avoid adverse tax treatment fails to realize such intention or for any action taken by the Committee with respect to such Award. The Company shall be unconstrained in its corporate activities and may engage in such activities without regard to the potential negative impact on holders of Awards under the Plan.
19.19No Obligation to Notify. Neither the Company nor the Committee shall have any duty or obligation to any holder of any Award to advise such holder as to the time or manner of exercising such Award. Furthermore, neither the Company nor the Committee shall have any duty or obligation to warn or otherwise advise such holder of a pending termination or expiration of an Award or a possible period in which the Award may not be exercised. Neither the Company nor the Committee has any duty or obligation to minimize the tax consequences of an Award to the Option holder.
19.20Venue. Because Awards under the Plan are granted in California, records relating to the Plan and Awards thereunder are located in California, and the Plan and the Awards thereunder are administered in California, the Corporation and the Participants to whom Awards under this Plan are granted, for themselves and their successors and assigns, irrevocably submit to the exclusive and sole jurisdiction and venue of the state or federal courts of California, with respect to any and all disputes arising out of or relating to the Plan, the subject matter of this Plan, or any Awards under the Plan including, but not limited to, any disputes arising out of or relating to the interpretation and enforceability of any Awards or the terms and conditions of this Plan. To ensure certainty regarding the appropriate forum in which to prosecute and defend actions arising out of or relating to this Plan, and to ensure consistency in application and interpretation of the governing laws to the Plan, the parties agree that (i) the sole and exclusive appropriate venue for any such action shall be an appropriate federal or state court in Sacramento County, California; (ii) all claims with respect to any such action shall be heard and determined exclusively in such court, and no other; (iii) such California court shall have sole and exclusive jurisdiction over the person of such parties and over the subject matter of any dispute relating hereto; (iv) the parties waive any and all objections and defenses to bringing any such action before such California court, including, but not limited to those relating to lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue or forum non conveniens.

B-17



fidelitycardpg1a01.jpg



fidelitycardpg2.jpg



broadridgecardpg1.jpg



broadridgecardpg2.jpg